Frage von stonecutter:
Hello,
So now I have just unpacked my HV 30 ;-) Schönes Ding.
This is a 5-minute documentary film to be rotated, it is a volunteer project, so you do not expect professional film, but it should act professionally halfway.
Now I have some questions: How important is a wide Anglebei such a project? If the ¬ 100 or stop investing, but only if it is synonymous really useful / necessary. (do not need a purchase recommendation, but only whether the investment makes sense)
In addition, approximately half of the film consist of animated pictures. Could it be that it is "funny" looks when I animated pictures and video recordings of the hv30 mix? So that the cuts as a clear "break" warnimmt. If so how can I prevent?
Whether the Project s.Ende than HD or SD video to the screen / projector comes is not yet clear ...
If for some answers very grateful!
Antwort von jazzy_d:
Wide Angle comes to the Project.
The difference between Video and Still Image, you always see, because you can not do anything.
Antwort von stonecutter:
Well there are just some shots inside of buildings ...
But WW is indeed sometimes a little help look for the film ...
Should I stop the sponsor of the additional investment Sinniger convince ;-)
Yes, that differences between video and photo looks to me is clear, but it will not stop "ugly" across ... Well, I think ... Try it and look ...
Antwort von tillbaer:
So the WW, you need to get in any case - there is no way turn over.
If you're in the editing program have opportunities in the still einzuzoomen, respectively, to swing on them, then I would make use of them. Blöd still only see people with frozen / Cars / waves.
Greetings - Til.
Antwort von markusG:
Yes, that differences between video and photo looks to me is clear, but it will not stop "ugly" across ... Well, I think ... Try it and look ... On Music intersect, then adjust photos in such a wonderful video, imho.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
WW is yes ... sometimes a little help look for the film ... For ongoing theme "film look" a lot of ghosts around strange views, but there are still always new ;-)
... the WW, you need to get in any case - there is no way off over ... Without knowing what in what way should be rotated, so is a blanket statement simply nonsense.
Antwort von kili:
yes, me is synonymous to ask why s.WW not gone away, would lead ... 've synonymous since the cam very short time and am s.rumprobieren.
otherwise the subject: I find, photos are often fairly good fit in so Docus pure.
s.besten purely or rauszoomen, drüber pan, rotate, contrast stättigung and increase / decrease (or everything combined). which makes it alive.
depending on the subject, you can use synonymous photos and even moving objects artificially insert .. birds, clouds, etc. .. wenns no question but the reality zb cohesive manner to explain.
grüße:
kilian
Antwort von tillbaer:
Yes you are right. A report in the interior of buildings' needs but not wide, which would be just too much to get's Picture weitwinkligen and in his attitude synonymous much too much unnecessary let light into the lens. Yes you can in the building just 15 meters backwards and adjusts's already back.
Good luck in this report :-)))
Antwort von kili:
Hi,
My question was factual. need not be equal Patzig.
I wondered why no s.einem weitwinkel away "over it. So why you are considering.
of an indoor-turning, he wrote nothing, I think.
grüße:
kilian
Antwort von stonecutter:
But it is advisable in any case, with a digital SLR to make and are then assembled and to animate rather than with the images / "abzufilmen". Speaks yes to everything and nothing against it?
Hmm, yes the WW ... it is very much filmed in buildings, so of course it would be good. Know me, unfortunately not so in matters of Optics. What are the main benefits I have the general order (must be the only investment raushandeln times ;-))
Larger image, more light on what makes the chip?
Distortion should not occur in a normal or? Know the problem only of flagrant WW of Still Image Cameras ...
Thank you,
poker face
Antwort von tillbaer:
@ Kili:
Well then read the next time up, because he wrote "there are just some shots inside of buildings." Since I am now since one year with three HV30's movies, I know that without WW makes little sense. He may indeed for his reportage not take infinitely far distance as if the wall and he might even turn a micro cable has. And even if, it would be an additional weitwinklige Recording Image Stabilization, which lack the weight of a HV30 would be good, unless he turns solely by Tripod.
Of course, all this without WW, but he asked not so sure then, because he does not want to buy, but because he, despite the amateur equipment certainly would like good quality.
If I can be like that my answers "idiocy" or "nonsense", then I rarely respond with greater ease.
Many greetings - Til.
Antwort von tillbaer:
Stonecutters @:
If you have a Raynox Canon WW or take, does the distortion within limits and will not be noticed later. You have to WW without very large rooms in turn, to provide enough distance for decent image to get. By "decent" I mean that something synonymous of space itself can be seen, as it were a reasonable shot.
Jitter is more Wetwinkel less, but a light advantage do you have so obviously synonymous only in full wide-angle position of the zoom.
On two of my three AGM's is the constant Raynox 6600 on it, because there are hardly any situations where I do not need.
Greetings - Til.
Antwort von stonecutter:
Thanks tillbaer and synonymous to the other for the good answers!
I had exactly s.den Raynox thought of here in the forum has so often been praised. Ok, that with the distortion calms me, as I said had no experience with WWS.
Why stabilizes the WW because my recordings? Due to the extra weight, or has some other optical reasons.
In the instruction manual is so, that light, flash and this instant AF WW obscured by a will. But this is to neglect it? Light is always too bad to good recordings, photos, and I do not need the Instant AF is faster but only to focus on rapid zooms and pans or necessary?
Antwort von tillbaer:
With increasingly wide Anglewirkt are trembling / jitter less easily from the extra weight will help with that anyway you less trembling. But avoid it is not. Look at various times in Youtube DIY instructions for floating tripod / Steadycam, which is synonymous to a good and inexpensive idea - a monopod, which you established in the state s.der Cam is mounted, gives you an extra handle, shifting the focus a bit lower and costs about 15-30, - ¬ - something you would certainly synonymous help.
I got the IAF with the two cams off. Have recently a film producer for a pasta made with which I pretty fast "Fresh eggs" in the machine had to follow (sorry that sounds so funny - but it's holding :-)), because the normal AF synonymous works well .
@ kili:
Sorry that I was so pampig, but in other threads (you know where) I was just so - because it encourages ever on. Nothing for ungut.
Greetings - Til.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
Stonecutters @:
If you have a Raynox Canon WW or take, does the distortion within limits and will not be noticed later. You have to WW without very large rooms in turn, to provide enough distance for decent image to get. By "decent" I mean that something synonymous of space itself can be seen, as it were a reasonable shot.
Jitter is more Wetwinkel less, but a light advantage do you have so obviously synonymous only in full wide-angle position of the zoom.
On two of my three AGM's is the constant Raynox 6600 on it, because there are hardly any situations where I do not need.
Greetings - Til. Hello
Have on my HV30 a "Hama Video HR 0.45 * Lens Compact" from my SD time, contrary to expectations of fits the picture perfectly
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... A report in the interior of buildings' needs but not wide, which would be just too much to get ...'s Picture Do so right ;-) Only a "documentary on the inside of buildings" and has much to be no complete recordings of mean confined spaces. I wanted to also.
... If I can be like that my answers "idiocy" or "nonsense" are ... If the synonymous to the expression of my chosen "nonsense" is, then sorry! Was little diplomatically, but not malicious meant.
Antwort von stonecutter:
Do so right ;-) Only a "documentary on the inside of buildings" and has much to be no complete recordings of mean confined spaces. I wanted to also.
So it should, among other things (at least try to, have not yet Steadycam) runtergegangen be a staircase and through a relatively narrow passageways are gone. Since WW would be a quite good impression of spatial order to be able to?
But this possible scene should not be the reason to buy, but if I have understood correctly, then yes arise in almost every scene only advantages through WW. Then the investment would be so useful ..
Antwort von tillbaer:
@ Bernd E.:
No. You were not really meant - thanks anyway ;-)
Stonecutters @:
We just say, You have so many more possibilities. You'll see that you are no longer want to do down. The Recommendation of Rolf is also great - it is rare that such a universal converter really fits. Look, whether you are in ebay such a find - precisely so. I had an initial Kenko :-( From HD because HD, which was totally blurred and always in two corners to be seen.
Against the jitter: You can synonymous a tripod slide together, and this gespreitzten with tripod legs heruntertragen the stairs, then synonymous quiet.
Greetings - Til.
Antwort von stonecutter:
as I said would now begin the Raynox in the eye, but I know from garnicht.
What is the difference between the Raynox and the tip of Rolf? For the Raynox, I need because of the different thread sizes have an adapter ring?
As I said I did not know whether the WW I paid him I would acquire privately synonymous, but I probably can not then with another vergleichebaren Camera operate, or does it?
Thank you,
Stone Cutter
Antwort von tillbaer:
That could be you Rolf synonymous only say that if he had both. I got my Raynox at FotoMundus for each 120, - ¬ bought, this is a kit with this ring. I am yet UVFilter purchased with 72mm, but this will soon against Heliopan 103 to replace. But if you're careful, you need not just so.
It is unfortunately not when a WW-on Filter Size fits, because firstly, the filter thread does not always equal distance from the front of the camera lens sits optics, and secondly because each camera lenses and other optical sensor size is different.
This means that you are in doubt, with inappropriate combinations of extreme Randunschärfen get that you are in manual focus can no longer zoom (otherwise it will be blurred again), or that you will get vignetting (parts of the converter can be found on the recordings to see. Raynox In the gibts Page tables. As you can see what the 6600 cams with 52mm else fits.
Greetings - Til.
Antwort von stonecutter:
puh ... gradually rauscht me ;-) If the head still something else, as the video for me with employment * g *
Thank you again for your competent help. Fotomundus seems a serious supplier, but honestly, I am now a bit confused what I need adapter ring. So it is clear, "Raynox HD-6600 Pro 52mm, the HV30 has a diameter of 43mm? brauhce therefore of 52mm to 43mm?
Maybe you could even tell me what I should use for a, yes, finally you have the experience, and how you've described above, it is not quite so simple ...
Thank you,
Poker face
Antwort von tillbaer:
Basically, you have rights, just as a ring, you need to get. If you Mundus at the top of the search "HV30 Raynox" typing, then you immediately come to such a combination. Of course, you can be a ring synonymous individually get somewhere, perhaps in einm providers, the 6600 offers a bit cheaper, a big difference but it is not his. You pay for only synonymous Mundus then 1x Porto.
Greetings - Til.
Antwort von stonecutter:
Thank you again,
Unfortunately, I've just learned that the purchase of a WWS is not necessary to be :-( Well, perhaps I can somehow still raise arguments.
After all, is not saved s.Micro, thank you but in any case it!
