Newsmeldung von slashCAM: More video samples of the Panasonic GH1 rob - 17 May 2009 11:53:00 DPReview Panasonic is preparing a test before GH1 and has already in advance a couple short video clips published. We hope also to soon to test GH1 ...
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von cantsin:
Oversaturated, artificial-looking colors (blue, green to brown säuft ab), soft picture with a lack of detailed mapping / schärfe (eg, when the houses and faces on the boats) - am disappointed. The picture looks more s.HD recordings of compact Digitaldotokameras like the Canon Powershot SX1 IS s.DSLR as video. The Powershot costs under 500, the Panasonix than 1500 euros, and the Nikon D90 for 1000 offers all the technical limitations at least a nice movie look ...
Antwort von radneuerfinder:
Get the original files:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2009/05/13/10814.html
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/DMCGH1/DMCGH1A.HTM
Antwort von NEEL:
Dear Editor,
synonymous makes you take a test for the Panasonic HMC 151? That I would find much more exciting than the Pana.
Thank you,
NEEL
Antwort von rob:
Hello NEEL,
151er which should be one of the next semi-pro cams of Panasonic, which we will test ... an exact date is not fixed yet ... but we hope very soon to test ...
Many greetings from the editorial Slashcam
Rob
Antwort von cutty:
What interested me even more would have the capabilities of the LowLight Cam. Zb compared with a Z7 ÓÄ.
Antwort von Ficeduld:
Gibts doch schon everything on Vimeo.
The Camera is a revelation.
Like who wants to use it.
The others will continue to pay much money for equipment with miniature sensors and fixed optics.
No, I am not of Pana, but wait on such a device for years.
Gruss.
Antwort von comix:
Gibts doch schon everything on Vimeo.
The Camera is a revelation.
Like who wants to use it.
The others will continue to pay much money for equipment with miniature sensors and fixed optics.
No, I am not of Pana, but wait on such a device for years.
Gruss. Rather not. Most video samples reveal only that the GH1 not the King will be. Any HD camera in the last 1-2 years is in the hands of a professional almost impeccable. The procedure we had with the HV20 then all synonymous, and it grieved not like the GH1 s.den subtleties.
It is with the D90, HV20, 5D MKII and the GH1 excellent examples, but more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap.
There are especially of work in Sony camcorders are in roughly the same light as the GH1 be (; DOF included), it says: wait.
Antwort von mht:
Any HD camera in the last 1-2 years is in the hands of a professional almost impeccable. The procedure we had with the HV20 then all synonymous, and it grieved not like the GH1 s.den subtleties.
It is with the D90, HV20, 5D MKII and the GH1 excellent examples, but more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap.
What prove "more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap"?
Antwort von Interlaced_Killer:
The picture is reminiscent more of HD recording of compact Digitaldotokameras like the Canon Powershot SX1 IS than DSLR video. The Powershot costs under 500, the Panasonix than 1500 euros, and the Nikon D90 for 1000 offers all the technical limitations at least a nice movie look ... 1) I had the SX1 for 14 days and apart of the Lowlight "weakness" (the picture was no more!) Were in good light the results are very plastic, but the colors horrible (which I found samples of the HF100 on Vimeo remembers only worse - was brown from orange, etc.).
2) Purchase a compact times with wide-angle viewfinders and intent, so that you almost come to KB 28mm, then you are already synonymous to EUR 1,500, -:-b
To view the GH1 is not too expensive. Only the battery life gives me to think.
Antwort von comix:
Any HD camera in the last 1-2 years is in the hands of a professional almost impeccable. The procedure we had with the HV20 then all synonymous, and it grieved not like the GH1 s.den subtleties.
It is with the D90, HV20, 5D MKII and the GH1 excellent examples, but more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap.
What prove "more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap"? The fact that the camera is no preference. With little thought.
Antwort von mht:
Any HD camera in the last 1-2 years is in the hands of a professional almost impeccable. The procedure we had with the HV20 then all synonymous, and it grieved not like the GH1 s.den subtleties.
It is with the D90, HV20, 5D MKII and the GH1 excellent examples, but more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap.
What prove "more than 4000 videos, which are only scrap"?
The fact that the camera is no preference. With little thought. Why should we then to a Sony camera ominously wait?
Antwort von Ficeduld:
.. yes, there will be difficult to think .....
