Frage von dukuzumuremyi:
Hello folks!
I have the desire to make my films really Kinomäßig too.
Synonymous, I've already done all the sequences, but not come over with my DV-AVI images (with Panasonic NV-GS 250), the colors really fat.
I mean, the movies are much happier and more saturated colors, while faded, they contribute in a DV-AVI video just fine.
Can you help me, perhaps, than my software is Adobe Premiere Pro 1.5 is available, and a pinch After Effects 6.5!
Thank you very much!
Antwort von Markus:
See ...
succeed in the paragraph under the quote
"... and the film look as intended."
Antwort von Hogar:
Geil sowas read again and again to: "So my film is done already - now it should look like in the movies yet ONLY! What is the program which I can do that?" lol
Critique s.dieser senseless remark is pointless - I will write to anything constructive. ;)
Antwort von b0kaJ:
Easy movie colors is sure synonymous a good program
when one looks at the comparative images on the homepage ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
I have just added to the lunch break a song. Where can I find the button in Logic, so he sounds like Phil Collins?
Antwort von steveb:
The gibts but only in cubase ... prrmmmppfff
Antwort von PowerMac:
because Apple has probably already thought of again not s.The customers ...
Antwort von steveb:
but it was logical logic .... or?
Antwort von PowerMac:
Then it would indeed unlogic ...
Is indeed synonymous logical that one click of a button nen Hollywood's movie.
Antwort von prem:
Troll or not ...
Sometimes it makes me really fun to respond to such a thing. You're lucky
dukuzumuremyi! Look ... You have the NV-GS 250, as you describe to us. This is a video camera or a camcorder. Kinomäßig that the thing is, you've already noticed quite rightly synonymous.
The real problem here is that you take in order not to resign.
Occupy yourself a little with video recording procedures and film emulsions. Then you'll see just WHERE are the differences. For through the eternal ruminate on sites like this one seems to understand None so right.
There is a LONG road ahead of you with many mistakes and turns!
Ask the baker of your trust, why HE bakes better bread than you.
Ask the pilots, why HE can keep the plane in the air, except yourself.
Ask the architect why HIS houses do
not collapse in contrast to yours.
Ask Anthony Dod Mantle, why HIS pictures have become better than YOUR ... although you have used the synonymous XL1s.
Ask Stanley Kubrick, why HIS films are somehow rounder than yours. Unfortunately he is no longer alive ...
What if you now with Before Effects 2.5 (Know How and Know Why) deals before After Effects makes it worse, as synonymous here (as there) has no competence.
Antwort von mrt:
People like to read it here ... Could it be that, take again all very very important?
If you have to say nothing of his problem, but let it simple!
It's just there are people who constantly re-enter into the matter and not as we have "tens discuss Years alllerlei issues and technical issues here and elsewhere ...
Whether he should try not erstmal in the FAQs and with search, was once an open question. But who is this opinion can not simply answer yes synonymous ...
And like with "Where did you get here with the your DV CAM?, Think s.Filmemulsionen ..." come synonymous helps nobody next ....
He has been described quite precisely what he wants ...
He wants a richer look than the DV source material. He has said nothing of depth of field, grain, etc. .. So no question of "how DV to 35 mm" ... Just hold a somewhat similar look, or a better look as the original ...
I can only say that experimenting with the filters for image adjustments ...
Lift-saturation slightly
-to hire. Colors correct something warm in the direction
Levels, and Premiere is now synonymous gibts a filter
Photoshop is the (shadow and light, or) something like that
so you can lift the dark part of something rather drown video areas ...
As much detail as possible to analyze the differences to your "request template ... Since you only realize what is feasible, and what simply will not accommodate digital video ...
As I said there is no panacea, and these are synonymous only a few little tips ... Even the man is ..
But perhaps helps more than the whole "oh-how-stupid-questions-can-make-it Gedöns" here ....
MfG Vfreak
Antwort von mrt:
I have to agree Vfreak - it was a simple question and I still was not even really trollig - especially not when you consider that the real look of the film is already made in the first post-including the rich colors (they look times on the DVD's are not "using scenes", which were not processed: however, the material of all DV DV Cam looks much more colorful - as already mentioned: it was about the color, not depth of field or the film look in particular) .
That it can not simply synonymous and may sometimes be impossible to 'get an identical look is certainly indisputable (who has already Luster or Discreet Flame, Flint, Inferno, or how the whole Nitris finishing systems professionals are called to this or can only partially use) - but you can get from DV material synonymous something more than it is home of the case.
A good and very simple tip, for example, would be synonymous with the color correction a very slight S-curve to paint in the master curve ", which the gamma curve of film comes a little closer (this is the black bit richer and the highlights slightly crisper) . I refer to the Color Correction Tool in Avid Xpress (premiere, I do not know, but that is expected there) works similar.
In Combustion, there is an option that is called directly "Moviecolor" and ensure similar effect as described above of Vfreak - After Effects is unfortunately unknown to me.
Greeting
Jan
Antwort von mrt:
Hey, Freak! I took it seriously!
What is wrong with someone saying that video is not a film? There are some who do not understand that.
Why I will not help if I say that if one wants to bring video, at least in the direction of film material, which dealt with the properties of each medium should.
Then you'll see just WHERE are the differences. Then you see that footage, for example, a higher contrast level than cheap video cameras, and it costs a little more light to operate in order to making top similar results. Here you can learn synonymous, what is not everything, or only with adapters, etc. ..
This requires NO camera. A fine used SLR synonymous doing it. By the way film can look pretty awful synonymous () all the old Schlingensief!
Why I will not help if I try to explain to someone that is not the tool but the user is creative.
Synonymous, I take the view that one should see to it that everything is right BEFORE the Lens. With a little practice you can eventually do without even largely on color correction in post. I am absolutely not teach someone to straighten bad material by fumbling. That is the wrong path. Perhaps that is synonymous with the lack of saturation of the fact that he holds the camera in the back, or possibly an incorrect white balance is set. Learn of Pre to Post! Cinematography is of the photograph. And those who master the basic rules of photography, it's easier to 'get good and perhaps synonymous effective pictures on video. Synonymous one who remembers when a camcorder is bollocks.
So add me and tell me not to Him, turning 's.Sättigung times, brightness and contrast, and then goes even with the colors, although the synonymous a' quick 'solution is his problem. Only then will come next problem is that the Picture Television s.seinem so wegknallt glare before and saturation. On the computer that somehow looked different. Then another comes and recommends him a reference monitor (the synonymous is important to buy only perhaps not for dukuzumuremyi) to make the cut because they s.Computer not the picture could drop us to judge.
You see, it could then go on forever.
Antwort von Axel:
Synonymous, I take the view that one should see to it that everything is right BEFORE the Lens. Ceterum censeo ...
Hello "Guest"
Come out of your anonymity, you wrote the phrase to refer to the MUs for each search query
filmlook or
"quality" should, before proceeding. Desirable would be a treatise on the principle of the importance of the FAQ
How does the video into the computer? With sample videos of the same scene, each time gradually by one element of photographic, cinematic, tone, lighting, equipment and postpromäßiger care is expanded.
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Okay. Join ...
Antwort von grovel:
when you consider that the real look of the film is already made in the first post-including the rich colors (it is time to watch DVD's are not "using scenes", which were not processed: the other hand, provides the DV of any material DV Cam lot more colorful off) But that is synonymous mainly because the unused scenes often come from tapes of the Production (ie also of video), rather than the film material is scanned. Film was synonymous, even before digital grading much better in the colors as a video. Colors as if you'll Kubrick synonymous with the best HDV cam is not yet there (eg, "Barry Lindon"), as has been synonymous interposed no computer.
SeeYa grovel
Antwort von id073897:
From the perspective of the amateur (moi!) Could turn the synonymous: worse than a few making-of scenes (far krass I have noticed in at Amèlie - presumably there was plenty of tricked), most home videos are not synonymous. Somehow reassuring :-)
Gruss,
Gunter
Antwort von Conqueror:
@ Vfreak:
you are unfortunately true.
MfG
HC
Antwort von prem:
What is wrong with someone saying that video is not a film? There are some who do not understand that.
Why I will not help if I say that if one wants to bring video, at least in the direction of film material, which dealt with the properties of each medium should. (...)
I am absolutely not teach someone to straighten bad material by fumbling. That is the wrong path. Am I completely agree with you. But I stopped going erstmal assume that the source material is included and half is the one who really does not professionellstan claims, but it takes only a little kick for his material.
Because sometimes enough to "control" already ...
Otherwise you could save them and even make the software cheaper ... o)
Of course, one must know what you are doing, and which one does what. But that may interest some of us, but the general public relies on
Video Refresh .. touch of a button "ala Magix and Co.
And I think it is possible with manual filters out much more synonymous
do not get quite as marvelous material, as automatics with ...
But generally applies even botch botch remains ...
I see quite the same. Have synonymous starting with Stillimage before I came to the video.
And were synonymous to me, the hair stands on end when friends came to me and asked: "Can you edit it and not synonymous, the Stillimage like yours?"
Only a sound that my motive was taken with an SLR and thus were varied synonymous nachbearbeitbar.
The "delivered" images were then compact and the aspirations of so roughly translates to "can you tell me the group photo from behind to draw on A4?"
So you see, I already know what you mean. But son some simple tips for quick success can be quiet times to give. If the person has higher demands, he puts himself completely of itself apart with the matter ...
Or just simply remain silent if you have no buck ...
I've done professionally with the filming and have often had to give crash courses in "how movies and I cut," even though I knew that it only
is superficial because the person is not plugged into the matter ...
So you have to through. You can not teach anyone to pro ...
Vfreak
Antwort von liddle:
it is so,
when magix video deluxe
You can with a bit of sharpness and contrast and saturation spieln, but has a camera in the lower price class nothing special on it, and it is therefore important that we tried during the recording, turning the best film to
Liddle
