Frage von mentao:
Be gegrüsst!
Since I The 134 in the search results do not really have helped, let me out my (Dussel-?) Ask:
DVD camcorders has already been widely discouraged me as far as what is clearly synonymous; really makes no sense to the material to compress again.
Only: How is that when you cut of HDV material? If the loss of quality when such material less?
Is that perhaps the main argument against HDV - because other formats / codecs, the better material from the camera would bring?
Thanks, anyway.
VLG
ron.
Antwort von WoWu:
Ron,
Basically you have it with DVD recorders or HDV recorders with the same "generic" s.Codec to do. At the same choice of parameters within which quality should be identical, except that the DVD camcorder is usually the bandwidth so low to as much as possible to the disc to get that visual quality suffers. But camcorders that with "reasonable" ranges do not record worse than HDV - (tape) camcorder.
Antwort von mentao:
Then the loss of quality of an HDV file, after editing and compression followed once on DVD, so negligible? Or you can see on his big screen?
Antwort von WoWu:
Antu you change the format, for Thou comest of HD and SD go after, because DVD is an SD format.
You can not forget when you come HDV2 at least of 25 Mbit / s and for the DVD on SD reduzierst you again.
But if a reasonable transcoding takes place, you do an adequate quality to obtain SD.
In most cases even better quality than you would have the same in SD because the upper frequency range is utilized linear.
Antwort von mentao:
Thank you!
:]
Antwort von WoWu:
... happy ...
Antwort von wolfgang:
Only: How is that when you cut of HDV material? If the loss of quality when such material less?
Is that perhaps the main argument against HDV - because other formats / codecs, the better material from the camera would bring?
Then the loss of quality of an HDV file, after editing and compression followed once on DVD, so negligible? Or you can see on his big screen? Antu you change the format, for Thou comest of HD and SD go after, because DVD is an SD format.
I do not know if here is not talking to each other has been. Was actually a Verarbeitungsweg of the speech, where you
s.in HDV filming
b) cuts in HDV
c) then to SD rausrendert?
Or rather, the question of how the look when you
s.in HDV filming
b) cuts in HDV
c) then to HDV rausrendert?
It makes a huge difference if I only have losses along the Render generations talking about, or whether I will last but switch to SD.
And in the first case, the shooting in HD makes a wrong quality advantage over the exclusive shoot in SD. The only exception is likely to be the HV20, the gabs opinions and test pictures that it would be better with SD equal to film, if the goal would be SD.
In the second case we will only talk of possible losses along the Render generations in a few generations rather low. Even HDV material can be viewed as data discs, or BD-R or DVD AVCHD DVD to burn, and then quite high and in very good quality play - the player matching vorrausgesetzt.
Antwort von immanuelkant:
... Even HDV material can be viewed as data discs, or BD-R or DVD AVCHD DVD to burn, and then quite high and in very good quality play - the player matching vorrausgesetzt. Since 14.02.08 the whole thing can be synonymous to HD-DVD players (which is currently in clearance sale cheap there) play because Toshiba finally announced the long-50Hz update released.
Just finished HDV movies as a (mini-) HD-DVD to burn DVD-R (eg with Pinnacle Studio 11 or DVDit) and then straight into the HD-DVD player. Runs Great!
