Frage von Rudolf Harras:
After DVD player these days seems to be so made that they are exactly
after 2 years into it and also problems with which one or
different format, I would have liked some multimedia Kastl
obtain or baseteln that s.den Television? can.
Option 1: Any hard drive with video outputs and a system
the current one as easy as possible codecs can teach. As my
Camera mov files and I make some FLVs from the Internet have
it will probably fail.
Option 2: An older computer and a hernehmen
Multimedia player tinker. Since I have PIII or
Althlon XP 3000zur Choice.
Advantage: You can probably play any format, my DVB-T
Stick, as well as the Typhoon PVR I can use for recording.
Disadvantage: If the Remote can be comfortable that is the =
other
Question should also be the most quiet fans get =
and the
Computer is of course bigger.
What have you learned as experience?
Or there is little affordable housing and passive fan for ATX
Main deck?
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Rudolf Harass wrote:
> After DVD player nowadays seems to be so made that they are exactly
> 2 years after they received and also the problems with one or
> different format I would have liked some multimedia Kastl
>, or use baseteln that s.den Television? can.
You've said nothing to the price. ;-)
I would not everything in a single integrated device. Already
alone, because then when a fault _gar nichts_ more.
Then you still have to be some detailed questions: HD necessary? =
BluRay?
Which TV Empfangsweg? Pay-TV? Thick box in the living room or
Client / server? Twin-tuner? What priorities exist
between TV, DVD, and possibly Internetkram Music, which between
Recording and playback?
And most importantly: What is currently available in the living room and next
usable?
Basically, I believe that for this purpose recycling old PC hardware
is not a good idea. Lately, some power-saving
Compact Motherboards with HD-capable graphics on the market, the
are better suited. Quite cheap, the self is not.
In finished form, the Dream Boxing something for you.
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
Rudolf Harass
wrote
> Option 2: An older computer and a hernehmen
> Multimedia DVD player tinker. Since I have PIII or
> Althlon XP 3000zur Choice.
So depending on the codec / format and wish for subtitles, I get
Ruckler even if I FullHD MKV with subtitles from the PC play
(AMD Athlon 64x 4800unter WinXP32Bit with Media Player Classic and
CCCP codec pack. For H264, but I use a DivX-beta2 because the
less CPU load generated)
> Advantage: You can probably play all formats,
With so much computing power and without support from the graphics card
Not all the liquid run format.
> Disadvantage: If the Remote can be comfortable that is the other
> Question,
At worst, an IR / Wireless Mouse / tastaur can help.
If you knew with what codecs, resolutions and
Container formats as you want to handle, you could say more.
Standardaufloesungen with AVI / MOV / MKV without subtitles, burdensome
Sound formats and so next should be with the older hardware to run.
But once you leave this way and start with scratch formats
(720p, 1080i or 1080p) to flirt, is that old hardware
without additional support is no longer sufficient.
Antwort von Rudolf Harras:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> I would not everything in a single integrated device. Already
> alone, because then when a fault _gar nichts_ more.
Oh, this is no preference, with a failure, I can still on the PC
look. :)
> Then you still have to be some detailed questions: HD necessary? =
BluRay?
> Which TV Empfangsweg? Pay-TV? Thick box in the living room or
> Client / server? Twin-tuner? What priorities exist
> between TV, DVD, and possibly Internetkram Music, which between
> Recording and playback?
HD would be handy, Blue Ray, I do not need, with any DVD. The device
used primarily for playback of DVDs and I shoot from the
Internet load (99% DivX or XviD).
For television, I have my receiver and comes on the =
the
House analog antenna. As spielerei I could as I said my DVB-T
USB stick used to record the ORF, everything else goes anyway
already on the Onlinetvrecorder.
Antwort von Rudolf Harras:
Shinji Ikari wrote:
> Also, depending on the codec / format and wish for subtitles, I get
> Ruckler even if I FullHD MKV with subtitles from the PC play
> (AMD Athlon 64x 4800unter WinXP32Bit with Media Player Classic and
> CCCP codec pack. For H264, but I use a DivX-beta2 because the
> less CPU load generated)
FullHD? Brauch ich nicht.
I have either DivX movies from the Internet or perhaps even
original DVDs, but then that's already synonymous. And that has to this
Computer worked so far. I look for DVDs no qualitative
Problems, no idea why men need a higher resolution =
should be.
In the classic 700MB-DivX DVD rips you can already see artifacts
But the really disturbing is not synonymous.
> Standardaufloesungen with AVI / MOV / MKV without subtitles, burdensome
> Audio formats and so next should be with the older hardware to run.
Subtitles FLVs were synonymous and there is no problem.
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
Rudolf Harass wrote
> FullHD? Brauch ich nicht.
Good. But it may be synonymous to hire at 720p will be somewhat closely with the
Processor performance.
> I have either DivX movies from the Internet or perhaps even
> original DVDs but then that's already synonymous.
Original DVDs (if you do not have any filter / improvements of
Software wants to use) should be with the PIII or synonymous Athlon3000kein
Problem.
But Divx from the Internet can be a lot and when someone because 'all
Register pulls', the already synonymous these processors heavily tax.
> And this has on this
> Computer worked so far.
Is with "this computer" a system with similar basic parameters such as the
mentioned processor model meant: then it works well.
> I look for DVDs no qualitative
> Problems, I do not know why men need a higher resolution should be.
When the opportunity has 720p, 1080i or 1080p of a
good source to a suitable monitor / TV to be considered, one sees
the difference. If that does not value or one of the sets
As components do not play along, or is Standardaufloesung TV
DVD perfectly okay.
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Rudolf Harass wrote:
> HD wär practically, Blue Ray, I do not need, with any DVD. The =
Device
> is used primarily for playback of DVDs and I shoot from the
> Internet load (99% DivX or XviD).
This is a media player of type "external hard drive", it
if the path on the PC as a player is acceptable. Watch out for
LAN connection and that the desired format fully supported =
will.
Price scale: to 200 euros. Cheap comes at you
Consideration of electricity costs a maximum of a real PC, if the
completely necessary hardware already lying around.
The option on HD and Bluray DIY when I would in any case
open, synonymous in the moment when it might be interesting.
> everything else is anyway already on the Onlinetvrecorder.
Perhaps more "still" as "already". Legally use these services
a loophole that will not exist forever. And, honestly
said comfort is different, at least what concerns free TV.
Antwort von Andreas Erber:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> The option on HD and Bluray DIY when I would in any case
> Open, synonymous in the moment when it might be interesting.
>
See Page 11/09 c't number 75th
Acer Aspire Revo R3600, it costs 299, - Euro and was loud in the position c't Full
HD playback. So, you can then at some point an external Bluray drive
buy and?. Opportunities this offers full PC
obviously much more than a "video harddrive.
LG Andy
