Frage von Starter:
Good morning,
I've slept badly again, because I spent the whole night following problem has tormented:
So, I need a second "smaller" Camera to my FX1, but I only as a "stand camera" (not moved) would like to use. Here in the forum I have to tip the HC9 found. This falls in Slashcam test but clearly.
Since I already synonymous few "hit" had to indicate with the FX1 and HC9 to shoot, s.Euch my questions: Has anyone a link to a movie, the material of the FX1 and HC9 contains? How does that with the wide-angle (is the image (edges) beeintrechtigt so much that this is s.zu advise? HC9 Or is the "original" so weitwinklig like the FX1?
Well, questions about issues ... should I look at the camera as the second-HC9 (and Capture-Cam) growth?
Thanks for your decisions.
Starter
Antwort von ef.multimedia:
From her wide-range of the FX1 is the HC 9 clearly superior. As the 2nd Camera, I would rather purchase a Canon HV30. This is much cheaper than the HC9, synonymous makes even better images and is much sharper than the FX1. But this is Weitwikel Camera unfortunately synonymous very modest.
Antwort von domain:
Camcorder in the price class of the HC9, neither the intensity nor the FX1 Wide Angled which.
The Wide Anglelässt but easy with a high-quality produce Converter 0.75 and the luminosity of the HC9 should still synonymous with normal room lighting (60-120) Lux good that of the FX1 fit, provided you do already meticulous manual white-and Farbsättigungsabgleiche in of either or both cameras.
I have the FX1 clips with those of the HC1 cut together, but since there were no visible drop in sharpness HC1 at room lighting.
That, however, today in the consumer camcorder Nachfolgenerationen not as dramatically noticeable.
Why do not you take the HV30, which is generally highly praised.
Sleepless nights are such considerations are not worth ;-))
Antwort von Starter:
Why do not you take the HV30, which is generally highly praised. Hello domain
because it looks like the image compare? I thought Canon and Sony would be in the picture but compared to differ?
That with the Wide Anglehabe I already thought of that "natural" from not so Weitwinklig is like the FX1 ... have therefore already s.den Raynox Wide Angle HD5050pro Thought ...
Gruss
Starter
Antwort von domain:
Faith is not that the problem is. Even the HC1 was in a quite different basic setting of the FX1. Much larger difference can be synonymous with the use of different Manufacturer camcorders actually not be.
But thou hast thou in the way of the FX1 Picture profiles (eg Farbphase -3, Farbpegel +4 or other settings) the FX1 quite s.den other camcorder adapt or, if possible, vice versa synonymous.
Complete agreement with you but hard to find different models, this must then hold the NLE excuse themselves and there is a perfect alignment is often not possible.
Antwort von Starter:
Much larger difference can be synonymous with the use of different Manufacturer camcorders actually not be.
Yes, I have just received the pictures Slashcam test compared the two cameras and the face is astonishingly similar.
Only remains the question of whether I am Sony Materials with a Canon Upload can ... basically it is the same but ...???
Antwort von domain:
Of course you can Sony HDV material synonymous with a Canon - HDV Capture and vice versa
Antwort von Starter:
Of course you can Sony HDV material synonymous with a Canon - HDV Capture and vice versa Well, problem solved :-))
Thank you
Starter
Antwort von domain:
The above values for the profile picture change in the FX1 eliminate the slight Rotstich incidentally, they of the house and has strengthened the colors somewhat, but there can be some times even try to adapt.
One must, however, always with two cameras are off, this is the automatic white balance, but you will anyway be aware ....
Antwort von Starter:
The above values for the profile picture change in the FX1 eliminate the slight Rotstich incidentally, they of the house and has strengthened the colors somewhat, but there can be some times even try to adapt.
One must, however, always with two cameras are off, this is the automatic white balance, but you will anyway be aware .... Yes, the automatic white balance, I have always made and I always take manual before. The Picture Profile s.zu fit should be relatively easy to make ...
Well let's see what it will HV30 or HC9 ...???
Antwort von immanuelkant:
So I'm pairing with the FX1 and HC9 very satisfied.
When I'm Wide Anglehabe air after a number of third-party warehouse for the original 0.7 x Sony VCL-wide essay HG0737C ruled the s.der HC9 excellent results.
Antwort von Starter:
So I'm pairing with the FX1 and HC9 very satisfied.
Hi,
how do you see the comparison with the image, you need to correct a lot of material if you use both cams? Do you have what is set somewhere that you filmed with two cams have?
It already attracts me more to HC9 ...
Gruss
Starter
Antwort von domain:
Half she moved him, he half-fell out. So take it.
The Farbphilosophie of Sony cameras in general is quite similar: less saturated colors in comparison to previous years, the adjustment can be a bit easier to fail.
Antwort von Starter:
Often zogs me out many times, I fell out ...
Well, so werd ich's done, you may understand in peace ruhn ... Thanks to you, I would say since verschohnt of all plagues ...
