Frage von daniela l:
Hello,
I'm looking for a current consumer camcorder with 16:9 CCD.
I have first noticed the SonyHC39 and the Canon MVX450. Since I know that the Canon MV900 turns off the stabilizer in 16:9, I want to ask how it looks in those devices.
What Panasonic and JVC offer in this category and price range?
Antwort von PowerMac:
What Panasonic and JVC offer in this category and price range? The s.Google tell you, b) the manufacturer sites, c) The Forum Search, d) the entry-item e) the trade magazines with comparative
Antwort von prem:
The s.Google tell you, b) the manufacturer sites, c) The Forum Search, d) the entry-item e) the trade magazines with comparative Except e) I have done everything already, do you think I should post elsewhere?
I am knowledgeable in search of opinions of people who are in this matter. Google does not do that, and the manufacturer of pages, I will probably find no disadvantages. Search and articles do not present answers.
How come you're not just a good person and help me please. "Google" can post so anyone who only pulls down the quality of a forum, because honestly, who then reads like essays in which time and again on Google and "will refer kümmer you better yourself."
But now, I seek the help of a forum.
Antwort von steveb:
Of the responding powermac meant no harm ... (he really just wants to play :-)... there are unfortunately so many questions on a recommendation to buy here, that if you eg the Einteigerfragen read in the last two months, a very good Overview ... therefore it will get for us sometimes tiresome to answer similar questions again and again ... not to be angry.
Panasonic's favorites are still 280/300 and the 500. The majority of questioners have probably synonymous decided.
".... Just try to find "buy recommendation
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) Only pulls down the quality of a forum (...) The forum you pull down with your question. Have you ever thought perhaps synonymous off five euros to spend MONEY for a specialist magazine? Five minutes I can herumgooglen synonymous.
Antwort von steveb:
.... are not arguing about it :-)
But you are standing when you answer back "topsy ".... :-)
Antwort von schumi65:
The Panasonic series, I can still continue downward, as synonymous, the NV-GS180's 16:9.
How much will you spend it?
Antwort von XXXLVeryBigLarge:
to 500 euros, I would have to pay for a good action. The Panasonic NV-GS 180 is thus just within budget. It has, however, in contrast to SonyHC39 and Canon MVX450.
Where can I buy a s.besten? Where did you buy your cams? In my favorite toy store Media Markt or Amazon?
Antwort von steveb:
It has, however, in contrast to SonyHC39 and Canon MVX450.
? What do you mean?
Where can I buy a s.besten Media Markt and konsorten are usually much more expensive. Amazon did not go. I think with the online distributors have made so everyone can own experience ... I bought my EP-280s with a partner. Good luck ... :-)
Antwort von schumi65:
Amazon did not go. Klar das is where I have my 180'er purchased under a short term offer for 454 Euro. What should people do wrong there?
Otherwise, I've bought in recent years, almost all electronic equipment in the network (from the headphones on digicam to food processor) and has never had any problems. One must search thoroughly and only look at the partners' "in which one buys.
I believe that a guest wanted to write to us is that the 180'er has no DV-in, right?
Antwort von steveb:
Klar das is where I have my 180'er purchased under a short term offer for 454 Euro. What should people do wrong there? The reader is amazed ... Amazon is not really (for multimedia products)
any price, but still far from reality ... well ... we look at current times ...
Panasonic NV-GS 180 EG-S miniDV Camcorder
List price: £ 540.51
that ... do not go! :-)
currently zb:
http://www.idealo.de/preisvergleich/OffersOfProduct/369176_-nv-gs180-panasonic.html
Antwort von VolkerS:
[i]
that ... do not go! :-)
Can not say that in general, I got on orders already synonymous electronics (eg my Digiknipse) is significantly cheaper than anywhere else.
Antwort von steveb:
ok .... admit defeat :-)
stop by once in Amazon is indeed synonymous not work :-)
Antwort von San-ju hachi:
Thanks for the tips! Idalo.de When you get good advice on the best dealer.
One more question: How can I tell s.Datenblatt a camera that these "true 16:9 to record" (no letterbox) trick? That is anamorphic 16:9, right?
Antwort von Markus:
At Id [e] alo.de you get good advice on the best dealer. See synonymous this remark:
Does anyone know of you, the online shop globalmediapro? How can I tell s.Datenblatt a camera that these "true 16:9 to record" (no letterbox) trick? That is anamorphic 16:9, right? True, true 16:9 is anamorphic, no letterbox.
Antwort von jpsaenz:
Well, 16:9 anamorphic, but is in the data never leaves.
Is it true that behind the "16:9" mode of the letterbox Trick and hides behind "16:9 (high resolution)" anamorphic 16:9?
Antwort von Axel:
Is it true that behind the "16:9" mode of the letterbox Trick and hides behind "16:9 (high resolution)" anamorphic 16:9? Since both mean ways to group simple software setting for recording and display, modern-day Cams predominantly anamorphic better-resolution version, whether or not explicitly mentioned so. Even better is dissolving shots with real chips, 16.9 (Canon XL2, and all HDV camcorders), although in the final output to DVD, the anamorphic picture is compressed again and the same with only 720 pixels horizontally Resolutionvon present. Where is the advantage?
Answer: When recording the anamorphic pixels vertically squashed for the same number of pixels. If the equalized for display on a 16:9 TV again, the pixel-wide beam that is in gradients and contours seen as Alias | Wavefront Mayaing and pixel artifacts. Also, the pixels of an original 16:9 chips are bar-but when you play because they were specifically defined in the recording due to higher pixel count minimize the adverse effects.
Model: A high-resolution picture can be clean upscale downskalieren on hand, a weaker resolution than standard-definition.
Antwort von Markus:
Well, 16:9 anamorphic, but is in the data never leaves. Yes, this is often not so clear. We had synonymous dikutiert views on how one might call the individual modes (see
