Frage von alois:
- Question 1:
how does the conversion of standard to HD manner, and
The quality is really better?
(Take for example the movie "Speed" on Blue-ray has been converted.)
- Question 2:
Does it make this conversion at all, or is to be the beginning of s.in produce HD format?
- Question 3:
I need technical knowledge relating to those who know can teach me happy.
What software will convert the standard format -> in HD format
- Question 4:
Which plugins are s.besten, interlaced into progressive HD-HD s.besten to convert, without that quality is poor.
- Thank you!
Antwort von Pianist:
Does it make this conversion at all, or is to be the beginning of s.in produce HD format? The question is very easy to answer. You might want to have just any Still image and take a digital camera to 768 times 576 pixel size. Then you take this file and vergrößerst at 1920 times 1440 pixels. The 1440 pixels, I have now made so that you are not synonymous nor the two different aspect ratios have to worry about. In HD, it would be only 1080 pixels.
And what do you now? It is this quality loss, then you suffer is synonymous with the high computation of SD to HD On. Acceptable is usually not.
Hence, if an HD-planned analysis, should be synonymous with HD will be rotated. The high-numeracy must be reserved for recording, the new one does not rotate or re-scan of film can be.
Matthias
Antwort von alois:
... Now the follow question:
In how many professionals the quality differs between Beta and HD?
HD ranges from well to beta-quality to achieve, or at least, is the beta-quality HD is not reached.
Thank you.
Antwort von Pianist:
HD ranges from well to beta-quality to achieve, or at least, is the beta-quality HD is not reached. This now depends on what you are under "quality" understand. When it comes to the "beautiful picture", then of course, provides a good Betacam SP camcorder on a "normal" PAL Television Picture better than a cheap HDV camcorder to an HD monitor. A "bloated" Picture of a good Betacam SP camcorder is in Color and Contrast synonymous to an HD monitor look better than the picture of a cheap HDV Camera, only the cheap HDV Camera Picture the cleaner sharper deliver, because they has just enough pixels. The Betacam SP recording has simply not have enough resolution. Or more simply: There are not enough pixels.
The figures put it another way: A normal PAL Picture in 4:3 aspect ratio has 768 times 576 pixels. An HD picture has 1920 times 1080 pixels. So almost five times as many pixels. Picture looks better but only if all the components involved, especially Lens and Camera, good enough. Usually this means: Pricey enough.
Matthias
Antwort von alois:
... So it's worth it "or" not in HDV with a film to produce a good story?
the problem is known to all, expensive, expensive, HDV would halt the alternative
to CineAlta etc
Antwort von Pianist:
... So it's worth it "or" not in HDV with a film to produce a good story? That is now a totally different question. What exactly do you have for now actually proposing? A film with a "good story" should be synonymous with good technique rotate, so certainly not with HDV. Unless it is a project that which would otherwise not be financed.
Matthias
Antwort von alois:
... we want to team with a comedy turn, but I stand before the financial dilemma, like other synonymous, what can be recommended here, and then in retrospect, the elbows are not to bite, because the HDV but not enough?
Antwort von Pianist:
... we want to team with a comedy turn, but I stand before the financial dilemma, like other synonymous, what can be recommended here, and then in retrospect, the elbows are not to bite, because the HDV but not enough? Again clearly asked: You want to produce something for which you have no fixed job and where you can not estimate, so if you ever earn money, right? Then it's a difficult situation. I would proceed as follows: Some key scenes in advance with cheaper technology and then rotate so go peddle. When a project of it is paid, all with better technology twist.
But from your line I somehow herauszulesen that you have no experience in this area and probably did not synonymous in the context of the film come from universities. This makes it difficult or almost impossible to enforce against people who have much deeper into the industry and to FFA drinstecken funds or ZDF-( "Small")-struggling television games.
Matthias
Antwort von wolfgang:
This now depends on what you are under "quality" understand. When it comes to the "beautiful picture", then of course, provides a good Betacam SP camcorder on a "normal" PAL Television Picture better than a cheap HDV camcorder to an HD monitor.
A "bloated" Picture of a good Betacam SP camcorder is in Color and Contrast synonymous to an HD monitor look better than the picture of a cheap HDV Camera ... And it is precisely for such allegations, I would like to view document images, Matthias. Can even be that you have legally - but times generally postulate that an HD picture was worse than a Betacam SD-Picture, but I think for daring. Even if a professional Betacam format, but it is just as synonymous only an SD format.
Antwort von Pianist:
And it is precisely for such allegations, I would like to view document images, Matthias. Then you simply watch what ... :-)
Matthias
Antwort von PowerMac:
This agrees with some things not. High arithmetic is better than its reputation. There are a whole series s.Sepzialprogrammen that good at. Toll is, for example, with the free MPEG Streamclip.
Antwort von Wiro:
Nu times let us nicely on the carpet to stay.
An SD picture will be in its detail resolution always an SD picture, since you can still see so much with interpolations, Pixel Motion and complicated Kantenaufsteilungen try the eye a higher Resolutionvorzutäuschen.
Of course, some software companies at the moment, the problem "we must somehow the existing SD material to HD will - no preference as to solve. Just because demand is there. But it will always remain a compromise. Where nix nix is synonymous can come from.
The idea "I simply rotating with an SD camcorder and the computer makes it to HD" is naive. The "real" HD channels have at the moment because their problems, because more and more suppliers offer material on the HD while it is in fact fake, but it is material.
But the ignorant consumers can indeed offer such stuff - he remembers it (often) not even. And then is the purpose: the main thing ordinary consumers do not remember ;-)
Long live progress.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
It is this quality loss, then you suffer is synonymous with the high computation of SD to HD On. Acceptable is usually not. That's the key question is whether it is acceptable or not?
And loss of quality through upscaling of DV-AVI I certainly do not look at the image on the HDTV is changing yes then do not ...
I watch on my HDTV Fulltext what the broadcasters to offer, for example, a PAL 16:9 Letterboxed movie and lo and behold, I have seen beautiful pictures ...
or,
I watch my purchased DVD s.per HDMI DVD player (Denon) s.and wau, the picture quality is great, perhaps because I see the details so my Stino-DVD player * I had never previously shown.
* Stino DVD Players DVD Players Stinknormaler =!
Now I have my hand-DV video in the archive on tape. So so forth. In P-Pro 2.0 an HDV project created, now the DV clips into the project window of there onto the timeline and in the extension s.das adapted HDV Project. Acha, recordings of totals are blurred in the close-up puts a little in comparison to an HDV recording. Now even with some video filters such as Unsharp Mask "and" Gaussian Sharpen "and other stuff oil for best picture. Now with the best MPEG2 encoder setting from this work a TS file and herausgerödelt per show 200 immediately and sent s.den HDTV geguckt. Wow, such an image I have of my previously existing DVDs and the old DVD player has never seen! A second experience is experience that, by NLE hochskalierten DV AVIs are better than the DVDs, which with an HDMI DVD player play, then clearly the data was very low and the resulting errors are also magnified. Scaled But a DV-AVI with high 25MBit / s, then drags the inadequacies of a self-DVD encoding with lower bit rate is not with.
And that is the best possible picture quality from existing DV clips and get nothing else. Nobody has yet claimed hochskalierte DV recordings would be in the same picture quality with HDV recording. But they are better than they are on the DVD is present!
Everything understood what I wanted to say, well ...
But now with the loss of upscaling DV-AVI to TS HD.
It's worth it!
@ Wiro,
You have to progress to the more open!
Antwort von Pianist:
Nu times let us nicely on the carpet to stay.
An SD picture will be in its detail resolution always an SD picture, since you can still see so much with interpolations, Pixel Motion and complicated Kantenaufsteilungen try the eye a higher Resolutionvorzutäuschen. Perhaps you have a crucial record of me does not read correctly: I have even written that the inflation does not work well, if synonymous since in future will have something to do to take the program providers to save the archive. What I said: A good SD Recording on a good SD-tube can be used to monitor audience better than a bad HDV Recording on a bad HD monitor.
It would, for example, no one come up with the idea s.einen tube monitor approach a few centimeters. With a flat screen to make the people but, strangely enough. For proper viewing distances, but my statement applies.
But yes I know that this argument no longer works because the people you are no longer with CRT monitors may occur. Is a great pity, but because you have to just bend.
Matthias
Antwort von fussel:
So I see this as Wiro an upconversion of SD to HD is definitely limits, otherwise you would not even be filmed in HD. Even if the upscaling should be better than its reputation - and it still it will arrive, with what hardware / software you do this.
I agree, but in principle the possibility that a professional format in SD has some reservations, not enough. I know it's not exactly - and did not synonymous tested. Personally, I think but not quite that hochkonvertiertes SD material really equivalent with HD material, even if not a professional format in the coming acquisition. But I am happy because convince - but unfortunately:
And it is precisely for such allegations, I would like to view document images, Matthias.
Then you simply watch what ... :-)
Matthias Matthias, you hold another benefit, and - not evil - I think a small synonymous bias against HDV:). The allegations that Betacam hochkonvertiertes was better, it's blank, at least for me.
In case of doubt, I would stop in HD - synonymous in HDV - acquire, and the material is synonymous with high cut. But as always with the question of Akquisiationsformat a question of available money and the available hardware.
Antwort von wolfgang:
The last posting was of me.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Personally, I think but not quite that hochkonvertiertes SD material really equivalent with HD material will be ... Has anyone promised you?
Where a fine detail of an object is missing, you can not substitute "hinzaubern".
It is simply more of the SD material with sophisticated filtering techniques to be synonymous on the HDTVs in the living room, nice to be able to present.
... And that goes I hope that you tell us not synonymous now with pictures and videos will demonstrate that HDV is better than DV-PAL?
Or do you have faith s.Deine FX1 lost?
Antwort von alois:
- 24P format, it really makes sense in 24P HDV in turn
or
Pro-SD in comparison to HDV - HDV is here in film-look mode with SD qualitatively comparable, or better, who has professionally with HDV
Movies rotated, there is a film in HDV has been completely rotated?
