Frage von ThomasANP:
I was in a business today to tell me about these three cameras to look, but there was not so before me as if the sellers know more exactly, although it was in a shop. However, he claimed all three cameras record the same image, only there was a difference in image quality of the still photos. Is it the quality of the film at all is the same?
-The other differences were that the 500 manual focus ring, pro-cinema mode and movable visor has compared to the others.
The 300-compared to 280 a DV input features. Otherwise the 300 and 280 completely identical.
Are there other significant differences between the three? If the quality is really like to change my previous decision of the 500 to 280th
Antwort von steveb:
look in the Panasonicbereich. There are countless threads about it or the differences listed several have / had.
Antwort von ThomasANP:
I've just found
I have 2 weeks before the GS-300 ordered and must say it really makes pico pictures -> day! As soon as it is not just taghell (inside of rooms) is the aperture fully open immediately and depending on at even less light you have then synonymous nor a 12-18dB gain on the chip -> which means krieseln fed on the Picture.
I have the camera returned to me and the GS-500 order. The lens size is behaving just like the motorcycle
I think the higher price you'll soon come to appreciate, as the larger "pipe" is
simply a better light collector and thus produces higher quality results :-))
and again
If, for example him mainly for outdoors use, the difference from the GS300 to the GS500 very marginal.
I've synonymous the GS300 in advance exactly synonymous investigated whether the 3CCD chips, which are not the greatest, less synonymous with good light conditions good results:
When my photo dealer, I have confidence with the SonyHC96E recordings made and then the same shots with the GS300. Conclusion: The GS300 has delivered significantly better results, clear, kontratreich, hardly Vignetierung Griesel and no ....
Conclusion: In any case 3CCD technology. Whether it be the GS500, I think rather less, because all the test better than the GS300 Cam evaluate synonymous and precisely what the image quality is concerned. These test are always synonymous with a certain caution, but they will be incorruptible in measurement and not identified with the subjective eye of the beholder. ---
One says it the other way. Synonymous've already heard that the 500 works in the dark better than the 280 and 300 was important for me because I would be inside and with much less light will be working. What is now true, I do not know, someone else has to submit the picture quality difference?
Antwort von steveb:
was synonymous with this?
http://forum.slashcam.de/testbericht-zur-panasonic-nv-gs-500-vt36175.html?highlight=500
Antwort von ThomasANP:
Yap, as the posts I have her. Here are two pictures, one of the 300 one of the 500 with 30 lux light:
300: http://media.pana3ccduser.com/media/GS300_30_lux_auto.jpg
500: http://media.pana3ccduser.com/media/GS500_30_lux_auto.jpg
For tagaufnahmen was no different but there is clearly one. These are synonymous frame grabs and still no pictures.
Antwort von ThomasANP:
Finally a video example of the 300 and 500 in low light.
http://www.pana3ccduser.com/showthread.php?t=7899
Antwort von steveb:
Boy ... boy ... but you want to know exactly :-) Maybe you finally time to write a review, looking for all descendants.
Antwort von ThomasANP:
Yes yes, is already demanding, s.einfachsten is to buy a XM2 and has at least the next 2 years no problem more
