Frage von snakenic:
Hi,
I have now I still got the Panasonic DVX 100 fetched. Now, I have noticed with the cleaning of Obtik because of the stupid acts quite problematic. And now, I would already synonymous to Obtik to protect a UV filter vorschrauben. I have a me of a famous photographer borrowed times to watch.
I am a little frightened, the filter takes me an entire Aperture away. Do you have any experience here filter is not quite as extreme with the light bypasses.
Thank you, Sven
Antwort von Bernd E.:
The filter takes me away a whole Aperture UV filter, no light swallow, at least not so much that it is in practical use at all would be noticeable, and not all have the same trim level. You're sure that your test object is a UV filter was not around, for example, a polarizer or ND?
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Cleaning the Obtik because of the stupid acts quite problematic If you are with "stupid acts" the stray aperture ... why do you take it to the lens cleaning does not just work?
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von snakenic:
no with my "stupid intent" does not hide the scattered light.
with the DVX 100 is before the lens was still synonymous always davorgeschraubt (with 2 small screws), according to Panasonic will void the warranty on the distance. Thus the Obtik modest but very clean. If one has the opportunity -> Just look at it. Can you explain modest.
And yes it was a UV filter and he steals a large aperture. It may be that he maybe was bad quality, so my question is synonymous for a good part quality.
Sven
Antwort von Bernd E.:
with the DVX 100 is before the lens was still synonymous always davorgeschraubt (with 2 small screws), according to Panasonic will void the warranty on the distance. Danke, werd ich mir mal an opportunity to watch, you learn always like this.
it was a UV filter and he steals a large aperture. Then you have a very special rarity erwischt! I am in 35 years Still Image and Video Experience no UV filter encounters, which behave differently than he should, and that is with extension factor 1, ie without detectable light loss. What brand was your test candidate, you know no more chance? And he was clean but hopefully synonymous?
therefore synonymous my question about a part of good quality. Anyone other than the one you had ;-) But seriously: I would make sure that he mehrschichtvergütet and not just a no-name part of the next Wühltisch is. B + W, for example, has a very good reputation, but synonymous with Hoya or HTMC version of Hama're sure you're well served.
Gruß Bernd E.
