Frage von ziemer:
I have a problem and hope someone can help me. In order to familiarize myself with my new camera on and still can eliminate potential weak points before my vacation, I was now on a short visit to Hohenschwangau. Unfortunately, I discovered the screening of the footage that the images with the Wide Angleextrem blurred and the picture is generally very "fake" look in terms of colors. I'm using (the factory settings, everything was not on auto) and there knowledge of the matter. Nevertheless, even I recognize the poor quality of ib with wide angle.
Attached 2 videos
- Panoramic view of Neuschwanstein
- Hohenschwangau once with and without Angleim Wide Comparison
My questions: Is the massive blur "normal" at wide angle? Why are the colors (so fake; sky cyan) instead of blue? What can and should I do in general to improve the quality of (; filter settings, etc).
Am grateful for all the tips. Even if it is with the HD350 is a very new model, it is still pretty much the old HD300 without hard drive.
Videos:
http://rapidshare.com/files/273625935/20090830_183225.m2ts
http://rapidshare.com/files/273627233/20090830_174246.m2ts
Antwort von WoWu:
404ERR
Antwort von domain:
Aperture located on a auto-controlled gray grad filter Consumer Cameras and all He is always synonymous with such lighting conditions in use, in short, is not the cause of the really strong blur edge.
No, it is s.Converter itself, which is obviously not suitable for this camera.
I tell you then an original converter, which was calculated to the lens, but certainly a different and also for those images have provided a tripod, slow pans and no zoom.
The colors are fine, especially synonymous the blue sky. It has no Cyanstich MUs.
Why do you films with 60i, ie NTSC?
Antwort von killertomate:
So I have the HDC-TM300 with the Raynox HD-5050 0.5 x in use.
The only thing that struck me at the test shots that at full telephoto, the sharpness wears off a bit, but what s.ca. the zurückzoomen 9-10x is equalized again. But could be synonymous, that was in focus to another object. Manually I have not tried already.
In the wide angle there is no sharp losses - not synonymous s.den pages.
And color distortions, I can not even see.
What a Raynox do you using?
Have you removed the original lens hood s.der Camera? Should you make ABSOLUTELY!
Similarly, use only the adapter, 37x43 and 37x37 s.Lens unscrew the screwed adapter.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
The
Raynox HD 5050PRO produced s.den image blurred edges, which is synonymous to see the test images at VIDEOAKTIV DIGITAL too. Zooming should be allowed to remain so as far as possible!
http://www.videoaktiv.de/Table/Hintergrundinfo/Weitwinkelkonverter/
For special shots, as is with a Steadycam & Co, the lens but quite ok, because while the image edges are not as important and gives the uncertainty in the recordings a special touch.
Antwort von ziemer:
The camera I bought in Japan because this model in this country did not exist. That is why I am filming in NTSC. A ND filter would be worth a try, if I am this week or it can muster in the USA.
Should I buy myself a proper lens hood for the WW?
Antwort von domain:
Spare you all the trials around neutral density filter, etc.
Only your WW-converter just does not fit, that's clear.
Basically, it plays synonymous not important whether the posterior lens sits 3 or 6 mm in front of the front lens of your camera, as long as there is no vignetting.
All Converter do not have a focal, but work like a pair of binoculars, no preference whether normal or upside hinguckt.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Domain
Only your WW-converter just does not fit, that's clear. Is there a plausible explanation for synonymous or is that again it's a "gut feeling"?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Here's a video with Glidecam be seen on the Raynox Lens. The boundary blurs as a very good fit.
http://www.vimeo.com/5205149
