Frage von Miene Baja:
the two I am now arrived.
target: product videos in studioathmosphäre. Both cameras are valued quite similar - in camcorders, the SD300 slashCAM test was a few points more, but in the forum, the HF100 seems to be popular.
Please tell me briefly about this your opinions! Thank you!
Antwort von WoWu:
I would prefer a 3-sensor camera always a single chip camera with Bayer mosaic filter. For the 300 at least you have a real chance to come synonymous to your "Full HD" resolution. (; Security is because the lens will be the limiting factor.) When the 100 is not the approach of a chance to reach the expected resolution.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
@ WoWu
Is this just theory or have you seen pictures of the HF100 schonmal? ;)
I am of the opinion that my HF does indeed very sharp images. :)
According Slashcam the newer SD300 is probably really a very decent camcorder. The SD300 provides a richer orange, as one would expect it synonymous with 3-chip. As I've done the HF100, there was only the SD100, not s.The the HF100 is approached.
Antwort von Miene Baja:
I find the pictures of the HF100 synonymous very good and also it is cheaper in the bay, as it is not a current model. Can someone me what the handling / value of the practice say both models?
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Ricky
Surely it makes good recordings and a subjective impression of a Picture is in any case the contrast setting characterized as essential by the resolution. This does not change the fact that one of a 2 Mpix not get 1920x1080 from 3x3 are more likely.
And with the quality difference of 1-chip and 3-chip, I have to do it almost daily. Although in a different league, but that does not s.den differences.
target: product videos ..... That sounds synonymous not just for holiday shots, but according to process material synonymous commercially and be able to exploit.
There is always, as I say, a matter of entitlement. And my answer is quite clear heist: 3-Chip
When it comes to price, it is an entirely different question. Of course there are "old" technology s.Markt always cheaper than new camera developments.
Then the question would, however, must be expressed differently.
Antwort von deti:
Panasonic is currently s.Aufholen strong in the consumer class, and now Canon should have been caught - not least because Canon has brought no improvement in the newer models, but rather a deterioration.
Looking at the price difference, but the now elderly HG * / HF * models of Canon to the Panasonic HDC-SD300, I'd still rather take today synonymous with Canon.
For me, a camcorder in this price range but rather a disposable product that is no later replaced after 2-3 years and lost money since it would be unfortunate if one spends more than ¬ 900 for HDC-SD300, which only marginally better in handling and Image quality is still available as an HG20 for good ¬ 500.
@ WoWu: I agree completely with your technical arguments - only I see as a buyer to earn a private individual with a camera is no significant money.
Deti
Antwort von WoWu:
I agree with your assessment in full.
The Canons are cheaper, of course ...
Then the question is just wrong and should have read
"which camera is probably cheaper to buy? But so be it ... best greeting.
Antwort von wolfgang:
So, as I have the data in the head, it was true at the HF100 that the best mode in fact reached an optical resolution of 1440 - when it is technically synonymous ausgzeichnet than in 1920. Now THAT is defacto not full-HD. But we must not forget that these values are still very very good, other synonymous priced upscale camcorder were almost never better.
Attained by the Pana 300 here now anymore? Of course, the HF100 is now already back an older model.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
The HF100 has a yes 3MPixel CMOS, the SD300 on 3 x 3Mpixel MOS. Nevertheless, the HF100 is superior in the lowlight of the SD300. In the sharpness it is still synonymous somewhat above the SD300.
In contrast, color quality of the SD300 Thanks to its 3-chip is much better - if one relies on the Slashcam-review of both your camcorder.
If it were not the HF100/10, I would grab synonymous to SD300 - despite the much higher price.
My next HD camcorder will definitely be a 3-Chiper. :)
Antwort von Miene Baja:
Money will and I will earn in any case. Ultimately, are commissioned works that are uploaded on Youtube - so the quality is fine, but visible in the "end product" in any case only to a certain extent, so I'm going out with 2 of them or similar HF100's well equipped to be. Or I am thinking blue-eyed?
Antwort von WoWu:
What it comes to you then, if not quality? .... If only it comes to buying as many cameras, it is quite expensive yet been determined.
But then I would oppose any such models.
Antwort von Miene Baja:
Of course quality is very important. For my production, I nunmal need 2 cameras and I am sorry to see something on a budget. The demo video that I found of the HF100 / SD300, I was really sufficient for my purposes.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Had we not had the time to davo n .... If the calculator agrees HF100 should take it? - Baja face?
As I said in HV30 tape HF 100 .... at Flash Memory that are currently in the alternate price performance ratio.
MfG
B. DeKid
HG, I like the plate technique, as here, perhaps not yet finally asked with SSD instead of HDD tuned ... then an alternative would be the ne ;-)
Antwort von Miene Baja:
oh no you've found me ... :-)
OK, I admit my defeat and remain in hf100.
one more question for computer power. (; 2.66 GHz iMac and MacBook Alu 13 ")
swallow the requirements of the HF100 without problems or do we put up with one and buys ne HV30 but rather because of better flow ...?
