Frage von BasTea:Hello,
danke erstmal ans forum that I am NOT a silly application quel had to my question here lozuwerden ...
So I scwanke between the above-mentioned models.
Eigendlich is already 3:1 for the Pana's because Analog-IN, and Nighshot these "cool" have manual focus ring.
However, I wanted to additionally filter (Pol, UV, etc.) and Lenses (telephoto, wide angle) to buy and have found the Pana 43mm instead of the usual 55 and 37mm and thus has a few expensive filter sau ...
My question: is there the converters of 55 to 43mm or 43mm of 37 to "convert"?
Oh yes, if anyone one of Cam's already possesses it would be nice to read a review
Antwort von Bernd E.:
There are the converters of 55 to 43mm or 43mm of 37 to "convert"? These adapter rings, there are (can you arrange each photo dealers), just look at the following:
1. There is no problem in principle, a larger filter / intent converter lens to a smaller set. Conversely, almost always leads to unwanted vignetting (dark image corners). Is synonymous logical because of the smaller filter a portion of the image field is hidden.
2. A larger filter fits naturally only on the smaller lens when the lens front line around the place is. When your camcorder favorites but should not be a problem.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von hyneck:
ohh
thank you so went really fast ...
... so in need NEN converter of 55mm to 43mm so I have to "vignetting" prevent ...
... If you have someone or something positive Negativis my Fav. (NV GS 250 (400) vs.
Canon HV10) can tell you please - I'm on every tip of nem me wrong rescues grateful!
Antwort von hyneck:
To filter so you can use 43mm. The get quite pricey indeed synonymous. If you have many 55mm filter adapter will leave a 43-55mm.
Have time for my 43-52mm in Still Image Mundus purchased.
As Wide Anglehabe I Raynox HD-6600 with 58-43mm purchased. After much testing out and her absolute Topempfehlung for the Panasonic with 43mm. All other schatteten s.oder quality was mau.