Frage von Shaggy:
Hello Forum.
I would like to see a digital camcorder hard to buy and am in my research on the models and SDR-H250 SDR-H20 Panasonic of pushed. About the pros and cons of MPEG2 and hard as a recording medium order and I think that those models for me as Hobby-/Gelegenheitsfilmer a good solution.
Between the two camcorders there (in online shops), a price difference of about 200 euros, mainly due to the 3CCD SDR-H250 in comparison to 1CCD in the SDR-H20 seems to be justified.
My question (s): Has anyone experience with these models and can give me something to the picture say? Is it worth $ 200 more for 3CCD spend? Is the difference of 1CCD to 3CCD so strong?
Simply because I lack the experience and I have no comparison synonymous possibility, so I would have some answers look.
Regards,
Shaggy
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Shaggi
It is not so simple ...
Is it worth $ 200 more for 3CCD spend? .. It is always depends on what and how it is with the 3 CCDs is made.
Look at exactly what Resolutiondie CCDs have. When a chip, you can once again approx. 30-40% of which will receive and
deduct your usable detail resolution for the Picture.
For 3 CCD 's do you not only to the full resolution, but possibly by pixel shift to
30% more. But it has a few other drawbacks. But in the big and all you come with 3 chip already better off, provided that they are identical chips (3CCD/1CCD). Comparison times so the chips in the cameras.
I personally would be a 3CCD Camera 1 CCD Camera prefer ... in CMOS, the possibly quite different again from ...
Antwort von Shaggy:
Hello WoWu,
So in terms of the chips I have found out the following:
SDR-H20: 1CCD 1 / 6''; 800,000 pixels [total]; 540,000 pixels [effective; 16:9]; 300,000 pixels [640 x 480] image;
SDR-H250: 3CCD 1 / 6''; 3 x 800,000 pixels [total]; 3 x 540,000 pixels [effective; 16:9], 3.1 Megapixel [2,048 x 1,512] image;
The fact that the image differs Resolutionfür shall clearly indicate (to me synonymous plays no significant role), but can I assume that the video resolution for both devices is the same, since both 800,000 pixels large chips? In that case would be the video
"only" in terms of sharpness, contrast and color are different, right?
I personally would be a 3CCD Camera 1 CCD Camera prefer ... In principle, I would do so synonymous, but in practice, for me, but then the question how far I can see the difference synonymous. (Worth it for me as an amateur filmmaker? If only the higher quality high s.einem monitor clearly?)
Antwort von WoWu:
Hello Shaggy
without me now mi precisely the cameras have to be employed and only on the basis of the data that you show so it seems that you are in single chip
Of the approximately 540,000 pixels only. 370,000 for the real image resolution did while you when 3-chip can use the 540,000.
The companies do not write like that because of the scanning (Farbmaske) the real resolution of the image detail is reduced again. But it is unfortunately so.
The resolution of these CCDs are not very high anyway and in this area has a higher detail visible in any case become apparent.
You will be the higher Ortsfrequent synonymous to see a normal television.
If you're in an HD-border area would move, we should look again more precisely, to find answers relating to, but in the area, I would not really save s.Details.
Take the 200 euros in the hand and make good pictures out ...
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Difference in price mainly due 3CCD ... ... in comparison to 1CCD ... seems to be justified ... Dungeon on the CCD issue but not the other differences between the two cameras - for example in the lens area - from the eyes: Thus, the H20 into practice relatively pointless 32x zoom (compared to sufficient and probably in better image performance 10x zoom in H250), but it has a fairly decent camcorder wide. The latter is in the H250 virtually non-existent: When shooting in confined spaces, you need to get with her so much earlier an extra wide-angle converter.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Shaggy:
Take the 200 euros in the hand and make good pictures out ... Yes, I had the thought s.Anfang synonymous, because after all you buy is not every day a camcorder. Possessions but then something started to ruminate ...
... However, it has a fairly decent camcorder wide. The latter is in the H250 virtually non-existent Thanks for the hint.
When shooting in confined spaces, you need to get with her so much earlier an extra wide-angle converter What exactly do you find? At the minimum focal? And if so, what is a good value for this? If the 47.1 mm of the SDR-H250 is not sufficient to in an
"average-sized" living room to make good recordings?
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Shaggy
I do not know if you like so well, but you're with 370,000 pixel resolution yet
in PAL resolution, which I had forgotten to add this because with 720x576 Pal are at least 410,000.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... What exactly do you find? At the minimum focal? Exactly, because this determines the maximum angle.
... what is a good value for this? A possible small. Since the actual focal lengths of camcorders because of their often different sensor sizes are not directly comparable, it has become common, the corresponding focal decades of photography from the familiar small aspect ratio indicated. There are a standard 50mm lens than a longer focal telephoto, shorter than wide. Now you can imagine how weitwinklig 47.1 mm - namely, practically none. For portraits in the living room ranges from, for no more group photos. Since thou wert with the 36mm of H20 significantly better off.
Gruß Bernd E.
