Frage von Studio10hasser:
The program crashes constantly functions s.and denied.
Conclusion: very last mud and grottig programmed.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Extension to Windows. ;))
For instruction: this is a joke, is to satirize the impertinent arguments of the poster, and ironically at the same time deal with my polemics.
Antwort von hannes:
> Conclusion: very last mud and grottig programmed.
Is not particularly well drafted, but where you are right, you're right.
By the way people argue with us in the video club, verse 9 was significantly better.
However that may be synonymous, I want to with the whole "pin have to do Driss" to nix.
Dear ULEAD, Canopus, or MC, where the order should be inferred.
Antwort von Alpinist:
The program crashes constantly functions s.and denied.
Conclusion: very last mud and grottig programmed. Yawn, again as a thread ...
Why are there so many people on studio that can handle nich so? I got the 10.6 on it since I've had a single crash, and cut in quasi real-time HDV ...
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
Antwort von hannes:
I have> to 10.6 on it since I've had a single crash, and cut in quasi real-time HDV ...
Let's sing Christmas ever:
.... je-en-em en-ers believe.
Antwort von Voltz:
Why not? But no one is served with polemic.
Although I work primarily with APP 2.0, but according to studio 10plus sit still like to assist certain projects.
Crashes and the like there, I have not seen for months.
Just the Menuerstellung is not correctly resolved.
Otherwise, the program has now matured to version 10.6 really quite good.
Antwort von Alpinist:
I got the 10.6 on it since I've had a single crash, and cut in quasi real-time HDV ...
Let's sing Christmas ever:
.... je-en-em en-ers believe. If you mean. Apparently Voltz and I are probably the only ones who understand a little of your system configuration and stability. And the HDV Schnit goes without problems very quickly with a reasonably current Calculator.
Just the Menuerstellung is not correctly resolved.
Otherwise, the program has now matured to version 10.6 really quite good. The user I do not synonymous ;-)
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
HDV editing work perfectly for me with this program!
Antwort von ag1:
Also I can not understand the statement of Studio10hasser!
Studio 10.6 is running smoothly for me so far!
I had until recently only a single processor PC with 3.0 GHz is available, as had 10.5 studio especially for longer projects, a few problems. HDV editing was snail-slow!
But now I call a machine with dual-core Xeon processor my own, and it now runs Studio 10.6 almost lubricated how! No problems synonymous with capturing HDV, in contrast to the previous device where I had to make some Verenkung to get HDV material on the plate.
Gruss Georg
Antwort von Babyface:
for me the software requires a tremendous amount of memory and operations sometimes take forever. But otherwise I'm satisfied.
Antwort von masterkillmore:
Where we are already exporting to the HDV as well is really the quality?
Is it just to natively? Switch (how original material) Or Maybe it would be worthwhile for some people at Magix Video Deluxe?
Gruß Benny
Antwort von Alpinist:
Where we are already exporting to the HDV as well is really the quality?
Is it just to natively? (How original material) If the HDV material is loaded into an HDV project and then re-issued as HDV, it is precisely the starting material. It is coded nothing new (except maybe added to the soundtrack). Therefore, the process synonymous lasts much longer than copying the file (s).
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
Antwort von pelikahn:
Hi, I'm new here and where we are exporting to the topic, I have a question. And although I do not want to publish a movie in HDV - but in DV quality or as a file to a DVD. I once made a test order and was shocked, because the quality is, to say the least, modest, totally washed out and blurred, bad as the material of a 1 Chipper camcorder. And This just can not be, right? The material should be at least but still better than any other DV camcorder. What am I doing wrong?
Antwort von Voltz:
I do not know what you do wrong.
For this you'd have to tell us with what settings you have rendered. Low Bitrate = low quality. So if you want to pack 3h example, a video on a single layer DVD, the quality is certainly little breathtaking.
What do you with "1-Chipper camcorder" mean I do not understand.
Will you now edit video or photos?
Antwort von pelikahn:
I mean best DV quality, so the highest bit rate that is possible. And since the quality would be much better.
Chipper With 1 camcorder, I mean the DV camcorder, which are used for holiday videos, so to speak, that is the simplest form. As the image quality is obviously not the hammer. But what I now herausrendere (of HDV to DV) is even worse than such a camcorder.
Antwort von masterkillmore:
Question with which version are you working on?
For I have Avid Liquid 7 with exactly the same problem and wants to change just because of the rather washed-out image on Pinnacle Studio 10.6 Pros.
I only know that if you look at the version 10.5've downloaded from the Internet as a free trial version, you have a Exelente quality MPEG 2nd
(much better than Avid Liquid 7)
Gruß Benny
Antwort von Alpinist:
I only know that if you look at the version 10.5've downloaded from the Internet as a free trial version, you have a Exelente quality MPEG 2nd I do this for the version 10.6 only confirm. If I default, 'MPEG-2' and 'DVD compatible' with 6kBit / s suppose I get a sharp 720x576 pixel picture from my HDV material. On my HD television, the material (from the DVD player looks leaked as 576i) still very well ...
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
