Frage von michi2:Hi,
maybe someone can give a tip. Studio 10 Pros crashes after take-off directly from (not that I could edit something). Already have several versions of Studio. Pinnacle has given me as an email help said: the first on another PC, on which nothing else is running. Then various boot sectors, etc. I draw no PC expert. I just want my half-finished Viedeo complete. (The program ran in between times.) I have an HP Pavilion laptop with 1.6 GHz AMD Turion 64 mobile processor and 1 GB of RAM.
Weiss someone whether iregenwelche incompatibilities prevail? Thanks Vieln ever.
michi
Antwort von AblenaMe:
Hello! Is the latest patch (version 10.6 - you can see already synonymous to the Star Screen) installed? Before it makes no sense to the next entertaining. The first versions of Studio 10 were all scrap. At least, the program is now nachgereift, so that you can recommend it.
Antwort von michi2:
Hello Guest,
the last patch I installed 10.6 (not 10.7 beta).
I have msn program starts in the disabled, but irgenetwas does not seem to work.
Antwort von hannes:
> At least, the program is now nachgereift, so that you can recommend it.
With quiet conscience?
I think rather NO.
hannes
Antwort von Alpinist:
At least, the program is now nachgereift, so that you can recommend it.
With quiet conscience?
I think rather NO. I rather think YES. Juhuu, again a polarizing thread ;-)
On topic: as I said, without v10.6 we need not continue. However, you can indeed times all programs running in background terminate (for example, the icons in the lower right corner). Possibly. Writes the program synonymous you something useful to logfile. This you will find the program folder with the extension. Log
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
Antwort von michi2:
had the following crash-record found. Maybe someone can start:
----- ----- Crash Record
Monday, 18.Sep.2006 23:05:52:218
Application: C: ProgrammePinnacleStudio 10programsstudio.exe
State: Complete User Logon
User: Michael Erdmann
Computer: MAGIC
@ 0xC0000005 Exception 0x092865B8
18/9/2006 23:05:52:218
Thread: Thread <Studio> (0x00000F88)
ACCESS_VIOLATION @ 0x092865B8
Number of processors: 1
Memory load: 64%
Total physical: 937934848
Available physical: 335130624
Total pageable: 1467629568
Available pageable: 855523328
Total virtual: 2147352576
Available virtual: 1637904384
GS = 00000000 FS = 00000023 ES = 0000003B DS = 00000023 SS = 00000023
EAX = 00000000 EBX = 0E0F1130
ECX = 00000000 EDX = 00051615
EDI = 0E0F117C ESI = 0E0F115C
ESP = 0013F4B4 EBP = 0013F698
STACK TRACE
0) 092865B8 () = PCLESceneDetector +65 b8 (0f380ca8, 005ff265, 0e0f1130, 0013f6d8, 00000001)
RVA 55B8
[pascal DllUnregisterServer +8472 d]
COSThreadRegister:: DumpRegistered
ThreadList
0x00000F88 (3976) Studio Main Thread
Priority = 0 Busy = 65% Lifetime 0:00:25.500 (User: 0:00:10.328 Kernel: 0:00:06.484)
0x000007B4 (1972) Unknown, created after startup 0.297000 s
Priority = 15 = 5% Busy Lifetime 0:00:24.750 (User: 0:00:00.906 Kernel: 0:00:00.343)
0x00000784 (1924) CMemMonitor:: Monitor Thread
Priority = 15 busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:23.218 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000978 (2424) RES-statBrThread
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:20.453 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000D1C (3356) Unknown, created after startup 4.781000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:20.453 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x0000099C (2460) Unknown, created after startup 4.937000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:20.171 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000B80 (2944) RTREBase call Render Thread
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.968 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.015)
0x00000B14 (2836) RTREBase call Render Thread
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.953 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000750 (1872) Unknown, created after startup 5.109000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.937 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000754 (1876) Unknown, created after startup 5.109000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.937 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x0000059C (1436) Unknown, created after startup 5.109000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.937 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x0000098C (2444) Unknown, created after startup 5.141000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.937 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x0000041C (1052) Inlay Clock Thread
Priority = 2 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.906 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000F78 (3960) FIO-IdleThread
Priority Busy =- 15 = 0% Lifetime 0:00:22.781 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000AEC (2796) RES-statBrThread
Priority Busy =- 15 = 0% Lifetime 0:00:20.453 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000078 (120) RTREBase call Render Thread
Priority Busy =- 15 = 0% Lifetime 0:00:20.203 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000BE4 (3044) RTREBase call Render Thread
Priority Busy =- 15 = 0% Lifetime 0:00:20.171 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x000002B4 (692) Unknown, created after startup 5.297000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.750 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000A60 (2656) Unknown, created after startup 5.297000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.750 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x000000A4 (164) Unknown, created after startup 5.297000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.750 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x000004F4 (1268) Unknown, created after startup 5.312000 s
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.750 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000468 (1128) Unknown, created after startup 5.734000 s
Priority = 15 busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:19.312 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00000F70 (3952) Kick-VFRT Thread
Priority = 0 Busy = 0% Lifetime 0:00:18.984 (User: 0:00:00.000 Kernel: 0:00:00.000)
0x00
Antwort von Alpinist:
Poste doch mal in the support forum of Pinnacle (the at least know the error codes):
http://webboard.pinnaclesys.com/read_forums.asp?WebboardID=13&SectionID=272&lng=2
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
Antwort von hannes:
> I rather think YES. Juhuu, again a polarizing thread ;-)
I stand by NO, due to my experience.
Except Bruno Peter sent me to this day None can credibly make that the "pin-Driss" really to get is.
My dear, this is not polarized, that is life experience.
Muchos saludos desde el Golfo de Rosas
hannes
42 ° 14,964 `N, 3 ° 12,136 'E
Antwort von Alpinist:
> I rather think YES. Juhuu, again a polarizing thread ;-)
I stand by NO, due to my experience. And I with my SO, synonymous on the basis of my experience.
Except Bruno Peter sent me to this day None can credibly make that the "pin-Driss" really to get is. How you define credible? How could I give you evidence that it is easy for me? For my part, I already have some problems with one hundred hours worked on the tool (since v10.5).
My dear, this is not polarized, that is life experience. Yours, not mine - therefore two opinions and divisive, because I have not heard in between ;-).
Regards
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/