Frage von chris*joker:
Hi,
I have h.264 video files into a Resolutionvon 2560x1600, based on 30 "screens will be shown (again with a Resolutionvon 2560x1600). What software / hardware do I choose to such files back on track? It is a high - end application. There must be no "Schummel solution" to ...
Hab unfortunately so far found nothing.
Chris
Antwort von RickyMartini:
What are the exact dates of the video (the file extension, the data rate, ...)?
PowerDVD 8 Ultra is a whole range of formats in very good quality. A recent mid-range PC should easily get baked.
Antwort von Marco:
Liquid playback? In this format, I think currently with a PC + software solution is not possible.
Marco
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Liquid playback? In this format, I think currently with a PC + software solution is not possible.
Marco 1920x1080i with 24Mbit / s are no problem because if the graphics card takes over the decoding. About 30MBit / s of a BD, there are loosely synonymous possible. However, the resolution called Not exactly standard, which is why so few people are likely to experience.
It is therefore 2MPixel Full HD 4MPixel against lush. Because of good quality should have 40MBit / s and more are used. This is probably only with the AVCPro codec (MainConcept). This material comes to a 3D-animation, right? Did you happen to have on hand screenshot? :)
Antwort von chris*joker:
Thanks for the speedy feedback. Here are the answers to your questions:
What are the exact dates of the video (the file extension, the data rate, ...)?
-> The more we can determine - are released in the decision. h.264 was only my first thought, because I know that the codec Resolutionunterstützt. But as I said: here, we can create what is necessary.
PowerDVD 8 Ultra is a whole range of formats in very good quality.
-> On the website it says "See anything with an image resolution of up to 1920 x 1080". I guess times higher than HD DVD can not power, but I will at times Monday to call and support me informed.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
What 30 "because he uses it and how are they" fired "?
Antwort von deti:
H.264 AVC allows no Resolutionvon 2560x1600 - with what Endod be because these files have been generated?
Deti
Antwort von chris*joker:
Liquid playback? In this format, I think currently with a PC + software solution is not possible.
Marco
1920x1080i with 24Mbit / s are no problem because if the graphics card takes over the decoding. About 30MBit / s of a BD, there are loosely synonymous possible. However, the resolution called Not exactly standard, which is why so few people are likely to experience.
It is therefore 2MPixel Full HD 4MPixel against lush. Because of good quality should have 40MBit / s and more are used. This is probably only with the AVCPro codec (MainConcept). This material comes to a 3D-animation, right? Did you happen to have on hand screenshot? :) Hi Marco,
no, I have a screenshot yet. Can I be happy to post but when I present the material. I refer briefly to the home page of main concept compatriots: I suspect, your tip was a direct hit. Sounds exactly as to what I was looking for. Vielen lieben Dank!
Antwort von RickyMartini:
H.264 AVC allows no Resolutionvon 2560x1600 - with what Endod be because these files have been generated?
Deti Correctly in the demo version of MainConcept is 1920, the maximum. Thanks for the hint!
Antwort von chris*joker:
H.264 AVC allows no Resolutionvon 2560x1600 - with what Endod be because these files have been generated?
Deti Deti Hi,
So on the HP of MainConcept is the following:
"Baseline, Main and High Profile up to Level 5.1"
And according to Wikipedia are with Level 5.1 Resolutions up to 4096x2048/30.0 possible.
Liege I wrong?
Antwort von deti:
And according to Wikipedia are with Level 5.1 Resolutions up to 4096x2048/30.0 possible.
Liege I wrong? ... that which is given on the Wikipedia page, is synonymous entirely correct. Now look again very closely and looking for the Resolution2560x1600. If you've found it, give it.
Deti
Antwort von chris*joker:
And according to Wikipedia are with Level 5.1 Resolutions up to 4096x2048/30.0 possible.
Liege I wrong?
... that which is given on the Wikipedia page, is synonymous entirely correct. Now look again very closely and looking for the Resolution2560x1600. If you've found it, give it.
Deti Hmmm ... Wikipedia gives examples - including 2560x1600 only once is not enough. Is that a presumption of you or you know definitely that it does not work?
LG
Antwort von tommyb:
With this you get x264 resolution without any problems and no extra costs. The software would then MeGUI Offers, which spits synonymous but a file with the file extension from MP4.
For liquid could play but it is not enough. Depending of the image number (FPS) and in connection with this immense Resolutionkönnte even a quad Calculator newer type of so his problems get.
If the space is not a big problem, then I would rather with h263, specifically with DivX or XviD drive. They can also be such resolutions, the resulting AVI file would probably only half the processing power required. The trade-off would be in this case quality, but at a high bitrate (compared with h264) without any problems, this would be the balance.
If the whole be a permanent solution? So digital signage? For normal play would be wonderful as the Media Player Classic in conjunction with ffdshow suitable, because the combination synonymous supports multi-core systems.
Antwort von deti:
Sodala, hab mal ein Video 2560x1600 with 20Mbit / s in H.264 rendered. Most players do not work as expected, because the resolution is not standard. It's best to use the freely available DivX7 Player for playback, probably because he is on of the MainConcept codec is based.
Deti
Antwort von chris*joker:
Deti Hallo, hallo ThommyB,
Thank you for your answers.
@ ThommyB: h263 sounds good. The idea, I did not come, but actually fits the codec probably better than h264. Will I try it! Like FFD Show. Looks good. Habs I have already downloaded.
Deti @: Thank you for your test results. Will I probably avoid unnecessary trial & error. :-)
LG,
Chris
