Frage von Mortin:
Hello!
I film on a fx-1 and capture in Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 as HDV.
I want my project and then edit in DV 16:9 and is deinterlaced.
I have now tried fieldskit deinterlacer and then Premiere Pro to deinterlace the material. (for the export to join)
If I get two images for visual comparison, I note that I do I get much better results with the collected material premiere!
Even if I leave After Effects to render, it is not so great as in the premiere. only the HDV material fieldskit progressive looks good.
I am in the fieldskit what's wrong or what is it that the highly fieldskit but not so good.
... and someone knows how I might achieve even better results with premiere?
gruß
Martin
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
I have so far only of the FX1 HDV over and so further. If you always only want to process DV, why Holst you the HDV material is not of a DV camera from? Since then so should the average synonymous go faster ... I have often - synonymous here - read that the camera is very much better than the DV converter with a PC is possible.
Try it yourself, I have not yet!
BG
Andreas
Antwort von Axel:
If you always only want to process DV, why Holst you the HDV material is not of a DV camera from? Because he wants to deinterlace. And since it offers to 1080i in the HDV Calculator downzukonvertieren as a man with Aufwasch equal to the half Quitt will.
Antwort von Mortin:
I work mostly in HDV.
But if IR, then stop like full screen.
No experience with the fieldskit and made premiere pro?
Antwort von king_porno:
up
Antwort von king_porno:
still high - None the same "problem"?
Antwort von Uwe:
... where do I fieldskit what's wrong or what is it that the highly fieldskit but not so good.
... how about if you have times when your settings Fieldskit post here, with which you can get so bad results?
Antwort von gibson:
All settings with the fieldskit are worse than in the premiere issue.
no preference whether or field order fill method, or how much I grow mask or omit purely suppose.
Could it be that I am the first film again in HDV deinterlaced and then must spend only rezisen on DV - rather than all in one go with it?
Antwort von Uwe:
All settings with the fieldskit are worse than in the premiere issue.
no preference whether or field order fill method, or how much I grow mask or omit purely suppose.
Could it be that I am the first film again in HDV deinterlaced and then must spend only rezisen on DV - rather than all in one go with it? The problem is: HDV is upper field first, DV HB unteres first. Without de-interlacing, you should resize according to the first computer with a right click the Halbbildreihenfolge turn. Yes, hmm ... + Fieldskit with the times, I would try with these settings:
Field Order => Upper First
Fill Method => Top 5 Neighbors
Detect Motion => 2 frames Compare
Detect Method => Point Difference
Motion Tolerance + Mask settings slightly to play
But, first de-interlace, then resize. That is of course from a distance "a shot into the darkness." You synonymous realize that I did not even have made, but if you get with the above information is still a little play, it should be with the FK actually better ...
Antwort von ich:
what settings do you render in after effects as if one has applied fields kit? Halbblilder from or to? After effects deinterlaced so synonymous when one half of 'off' setting, ie without a kit fields.
Thank you
Antwort von weitwinkel:
@ mortin:
the thread has long since
but how does it now with your initial claim:
premiere deinterlaced better than fieldskit + s.aus?
did you say after trying this principle?
http://www.final-cut-pro.de/stage/_inhalte/berichte/016_hdv_zu_sd.php5?navid=2http://www.final-cut-pro.de/stage/_inhalte/berichte/016_hdv_zu_sd.php5? Navid = 2
or is runterskalieren out?
gruß cj
