Frage von Mantis:
.... first of all: I have already used the SuFu.
First my system:
Core 2 Duo E6750
4 GB Patriot Ram
Gforce MSI 8800GTX
500 GB Samsung S-ATA HDD
In 9x 32max Abit 680i motherboard wifi
Vista Ultimate 64
All drivers are up to date!
My problem:
Use Video Editing for Premiere Pro 2nd Have only one video is imported into the program (. Wmv, h264 codec, 143MB).
If I have the video from the timeline in the Preview window will look jerky what the paste / fine-tuning of effects, of course, very difficult.
I like to say that I am a newbie premiere, since I so far only a little with Sony Vegas and Final Cut Pro (Basics through my job) worked.
But what makes me aback:
I have it synonymous with a different video tried that some time ago in Sony Vegas (then 4) was easy to edit. Now there are jerky but synonymous.
Premiere, however, is on a pflatschneuen system installed. Viruses are not synonymous or so drauf. Where is because that is the problem?
Is it really notwenid each material before rendering and then re-import?
And if so, what format comes with Premiere since s.besten clear?
Antwort von sh20:
Aaahhhhh!
Why can precisely here because nobody will help?
Antwort von PowerMac:
First, contrary to WMV and H.264.
Secondly, both distribution and size are not suitable for processing because they are too much CPU when playing claim. Editing format require little power to the (de-) coding.
Thirdly, there is a discrepancy between the format settings of your timeline and the format of your "WMV - H.264" file, so the video must be rendered. Your premiere creates it halfway into the real thing at the right format to convert, but not with full data rate. Would you still apply effects, were nothing more.
Ergo: Clip and timeline must be in the format settings, only then is a "native editing is possible. And certainly not WMV natively can be processed. Therefore, a recoding previously required. Use standard format so and predefined configurations. That is about DV or HDV at comparatively unprofessional premiere. The "Basics" in your profession, you could catch up again. You're an absolute beginner mistakes. That has nothing to do with Premiere, but can be applied to any workflow averaged over.
Antwort von besucher2007:
Well I'm only since August 1st Apprenticeship, as expected beginner mistakes probably still be forgiven, I hope.
But why are contradictory. Wmv and h264? When I look at the file in Media Coder (Tool of here) and go, then me the specifications as shown. The file extension is synonymous. Wmv?
[/ img] URL = http://imageshack.us]
zum Bild [/ url]
Antwort von besucher2007:
Achso and why is unprofessional Premiere's agreement to a program?
At work I use Final Cut Pro, which is actually equivalent to this. That I will not stand up Avid or the like, is clearly yes .... but what programs are so used?
Sorry, but only by asking silly you learn about this ;-)
Antwort von soahC:
Well, I must say that I am sick synonymous fairly s.dass you always somehow "belöächelt" is when you cut with Premiere. I find the program great!
Have half a year working with Avid and recently had a 1-week training Avid and I must say that I Avid HASSE! I come in so clear and may be synonymous beautifully cut so quickly, but the flaws outweigh the significant! Those things are outrageously expensive pieces but no more stable than premiums completely zugemüllter PC! A great workflow, I can at the billions of different tools and discovering not synonymous Modis (Effect Editor, Segment Mode, Trim Mode ...). And creative work falls to me synonymous with the Avid seeehr much harder. We tried simply do not like rum s.Avid, just because you constantly need to switch modes in order to move something or so. Since Premiere and FC is simply worlds "intuitive". And went in the training EVERY so.
A week later came the final cut training, and there has been any better! Final Cut is the future! And now someone please explain to me the difference between FC and Premiere ... which for me are really exactly the same program!
Antwort von PowerMac:
Oh yeah?
Then you can start with your "professional" premiere certainly synonymous RED material, DVCProHD, IMX, XDCAM HD, XDCAM EX, etc. edit!
Antwort von smooth-appeal:
With plug-ins ... mostly yes! I have nothing against FinalCut is very successful. Nevertheless, I am using the Adobe suite, because I all Programs and do I need and I'm not dissatisfied.
Since the fix for my 64bit OS, everything is fast, clean, not to say perfectly. No reason for me to overpriced Mac hardware investing. Unfortunately not everyone gets the money in the ass pushed ;-)
Antwort von Wiro:
Now listen to finally stop with these childish unf prayer-like mill discussions.
Who broadcast requirements and Adobe software wants to go to a broadcast system and equipment is after a few days get a box that meets these requirements. A downloaded from the network will premiere trial do not meet these requirements, but a professional will try not synonymous. In addition, he is very professional.
Example:
The Matrox Axio and Adobe CS3 Production Studio software.
HD and SD editing in real time for broadcast and prof. Post Production.
HDV 1080i
HDV 1080p
HDV 720p
DVC PRO HD
DV, DVCPRO, DVCAM
DVCPRO50
P2 MXF - DVCPRO50, DVC PRO HD
XDCAM MXF - DVCAM, IMX
XDCAM HD MXF 18, 25, 35 mbps Slow & Quick Motion
MPEG-2 4:2:2 I-frame SD - 10-50 Mbps
Uncompressed 8-bit and 10-bit SD
Uncompressed 8-bit and 10-bit HD
MPEG-2 4:2:2 I-frame HD at horizontal Resolution1440 @ 50-300 Mbps
MPEG-2 4:2:2 I-frame HD at horizontal Resolution1920 @ 50-300 Mbps
MPEG-2 4:2:2 I-frame HD at horizontal Resolution1280 @ 50-300 Mbps
Compressed HD for offline
Etc.
AES/EBU- audio with 2 inputs and 6 outputs, XLR - audio with 2 inputs and 6 outputs, SDI embedded audio with 8 inputs and 6 outputs, ¼ "output jack for stereo monitoring.
Again, this Herumdiskutiererei Adobe / Final Cut Pro is childish and unprofessional.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
And you do up there really discuss pros?
I'm very impressed ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
Professionals are always serious. You never discuss. You are never polemical. You are never ironic. You never spur especially the public. And they never provoke.
Antwort von soahC:
I do not want to discuss! my opinion will not change, because I work on all systems (or work done)
I just do not understand why so many people hold s.avid! only from traditional? and why is final cut more and more accepted, but no premiere piece. I can see between the two programs simply NOT different!
photoshop and after effects are synonymous standard, and yes this is synonymous of adobe ...
Antwort von Jörg:
and why is final cut more and more accepted, but no premiere piece. that you should not interfere in the slightest. What itches you because what it says is everything?
The intelligent user adopts the program, with which it achieves its objectives,
s.meisten him is that he can operate.
The whole under the aspect of "professional" for sale is absolute nonsense.
Also there has Wiro again 100% right .... Kinderkram!
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) Kinderkram! I do synonymous like Erwachsenenkram ...:)
Antwort von Mein Name geht nicht mehr:
So it really has me now so synonymous not helped .....;-)
How do I convert a file so s.besten with the following Spezis?
Antwort von Mark1RS:
now I get no answer?
Antwort von Wiro:
Hello,
as long as you once as "guest" and the next time the "name is not" firmierst and no signature dazufügst it is hardly possible to make sense to understand who is what is being posted. Denk synonymous times s.diejenigen the read and reconstruct them. But you want an answer, not us.
On the issue itself:
After you have your screenshots as a WMV with 1280x720 @ 29.97 fps encoded with 3.3 Mbit.
Of course it jerky when you get a distribution format in the timeline draw. Just Push ENTER, then the entire video first Editable expected and the red line will turn green. With each added effect, the route will be in effect again red area and you say that you have to once again render.
So, it's at, if one with insufficient material to cut a video. This goes all the way to try it ;-)
Gruss Wiro
