Infoseite // Problems with video crossfades in APP2.0



Frage von Tiger955:


Hello NG!

I have a problem with video crossfades in APP2.0 whose cause me or disposal are not clear.

I have an avi of my Camera imported (but not with "Scene Search", so I have everything in a avi file) and cut it in the editing window now with the razor blade. The clips I would like now with various blends into each other on leave. So far so clear thing. In addition, the behavior occurs synonymous to when I source InOut monitor medium-points cut.

The program can monitor the sequence, however, I recognize that the blending is not "clean" work, ie they are not superimposed on a continuous s.dem the beginning of the crossfade (duration of 1.5 sec set), but jerky, until the Clipende a clip, nothing happens, or it is still the ending clip, until the cut, ie at the beginning of the new clip fade happens.

Example using the dazzle video about "zoom":
Picture B increases quadratically from the center of Picture A.

If I were in the monitor frame by frame sequence of the play, one sees clearly that from the middle of the Picture A to approximately 0.06 seconds before the clip starts B, A still picture appears, then Picture B is shown.

Normal would be that - regardless of the length of the crossfade - now already in the smallest square Picture B appears.

The same behavior occurs with other crossfades to just zoom in with the squares it can be very nice track frame by frame.

In short, it wants no exact crossfading, as I knew of 6.5 Prem succeed. Even an attempt to clip each s.ende and s.anfang of one of the new clips to distinguish to do not the rest frame of the new scene forward or turn back to have brought no improvement (such as crying my Prem 6.5 to, where you in the timeline so beautiful frame accurately cut could ...!).

What is the reason, or is the s.irgendeiner setting (I think I rather not)?

How I correct this, or how can I possibly made all the works from Sequenz1 sequence into a new copy?

Thank you
Michael

Space


Antwort von robl21f:

Hello

synonymous if I made the not so distant for them to read this as a problem of "too little meat have glare" at

if you have a clip with the razor blade auseinanderschneidest and constitutes a direct s.die hide sets does not ... teste once s.der interface and the resulting end of the beginning of each 4 sec clips cut (4 sec 4 sec <l>), close the resulting gap and do a panel ... what's the result?

I've never worked with the 6.5, but know from other forums that as 6.5 and 2.0 in the composition hide something differ ... other times if necessary foreninger diesbezgl sift through ...

sequences copy / paste: actually the corresponding sequence from the project in a new window / other sequence by draganddrop draw .... or was it meant otherwise?

gruss rob

Space


Antwort von Tiger955:

Hi Rob!

Good word "Blend meat."

Yes, if I 4 sec <l> 4 sec it works soon!

But what do I do if I have 4 or 2 x sec not "sacrifice" may be?

As I said in Prem 6.5 frame, I could just cut and cut to the exact as long crossfades make, without regard to any "blend of meat."

It is surely now at 2.0 APP not be that when splitting a clip must calculate that for a crossfade front and rear frames needs.

In two clips, it seems to auto work if I have two AVI clips from a medium-Ins / Outs create, synonymous, it seems to be working, only with the razor blade, I had problems.

But the problem does not seem to perform consistently, accurately, I can no pattern.

Strange, huh?

Thanks anyway for the tip.

Greeting
Michael

Space


Antwort von Wiro:

Now let's slow with the young horses.
The principle of an Aperture works with all programs cut immediately - no preference whether it is or AP6 Appro or Final Cut Pro or Avid act.

The two clips that are to be dazzled must overlap, wenns work. This is a physical law and is in the version he AP6-synonymous otherwise. If they do not overlap (no flesh trim) hides premiere of a Warnbox, which indicates that the absence of meat simply aperture is filled with statues.

Also: clips for the duration of the Aperture slide into each other and ready.
Many of switching to Pro v.6 make it so that they blend with the clips in 2 lanes on each other and thus create a better overview of the overlap - it is similar then the representation in v.6. In this case, then the aperture on the upper clip set.

Good luck
Greeting Wiro

Space


Antwort von Tiger955:

Wiro Hello!

Where is then the difference between a timeline on the razor blade with clip divided into two clips and one in source monitor by using the in / out points divided clip, then the two clips on the timeline has been pulled?

Both should then either
Auto-Blend meat "dazubekommen"
or both NOT clean crossfades (as of me as a problem) together.

In both cases I DO NOT move, just as you described of the two clips to the length of the crossfade.

Yet is has been to observe the following:
Method "razor blade": no clean crossfading, after Robs Instructions after manual correction
Method In / Out Point in the Source Monitor: auto has the same functions

Hence my lack of understanding, moreover, there was no warning of APP.

Thanks anyway for the tip with the two video tracks à la Prem 6.5, I have just to switch to APP 2.0 is not yet fully digested.

Greeting
Michael

Space


Antwort von robl21f:

the fundamental problem is not executed when capturing szene separation .... 2.0 prem treated all of you cut parts as part of a large clips, no preference whether you use it in the timeline or a share as part in-/out-points define .... draw you to the cut end, no preference whether the front or rear, so you can draw him as thou wilt, thou shalt s.ende always get the whole clip ... :-) the result is always a blend flesh what is before the cut or in-out points is.

with clips separation ends with scenes of the front and rear clip and it will NOT blend the meat untrimmed clips directly adjacent to a diaphragm and is ... since then appears the message of Wiro said ... because there is no meat .... in your case, but he takes the part of the front or the back you were off .... so that the panel is working properly but have different clipmotive (!) always overlap .... therefore of the above-described me away, or separate clips (clip of a / home clip b) lying about each other traces overlap and let in the upper panel set

is a bit tricky but if you in your next film the scene on separation does not have this problem more ... No more than the message of Wiro mentioned ;-))

evt Wiro you can still understand a thing or two to say :-)

gruss rob

Space


Antwort von Tiger955:

Hi Rob!

Thanks, I think I understood it.

Greeting
Michael

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash