Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Apple forbids QuickTime Alternative Player of thomas - 6 Jun 2007 16:02:00 Apple has released QuickTime Alternative, "a slim bundle of Media Player Classic with integrated QuickTime codecs which, as the official QuickTime player was in a position such as QuickTime files. Movs play, the Codec Guide Page prohibited next to him. The Page praises instead the K-Lite Codec Pack s.um regardless of Apple's QuickTime Player to play files. Video embedded in Web pages, on the other hand play only with officially installed QT player.
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von Edman82:
this is what I do not like s.apple,
alternatively do so, modern and elitist and are
s.ende no different than microsoft.
gruß cj
Antwort von WINner:
Yes, but there are enough wannabe individualists drauf rein.
Apples are the main customers
Antwort von Milan:
Thank you,
that was the impetus I needed to me to decide n macbook;)
Antwort von Chezus:
Yes exactly, I would like to be an individualist and that is why I buy a Mac ... lol ...
Antwort von jogol:
Apple's main clientele are people who prefer an easy-to nurturing stable system rather than a continuous set with handicraft stalls or permanent sites rumkloppen them.
Antwort von Valentino:
I think it's stupid, which prohibited the Apple, but for such reasons I am sure most of the best free product on CD \ DVD and it has since 1999, so what's all Zusammgekommen is almost two DVDs.
It is not me, however, prevent the PC on my next Mac Pro will be. I like working with both systems, with Windows and with Mac OS. I got my current calculator before about 4 years zusammengebastelt themselves and stop him again and again according to my wishes upgraded. Because the Mac Pro is conditionally synonymous and Final Cut Pro has become my favorite program is, I will buy a Mac. An advantage of the likes of Windows users will see a halt in Apple hardware and software very closely aligned, is.
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Eva Maier:
Who hardware or software manufactured after 2000 must use is an army Sau anyway, because it is synonymous to such trifles no longer depends on.
/ (E
Antwort von Isekram:
What is so bad s.QT players that want to use an alternative?
Antwort von Edman82:
What is so bad s.QT players that want to use an alternative? He is quite
bold: needs a relatively large amount of memory, always sits in the taskbar and runs complacent around slowly ...
Antwort von JMitch:
Who hardware or software manufactured after 2000 must use is an army Sau anyway, because it is synonymous to such trifles no longer depends on.
/ (E Another mystery Maier. Insiders know what is meant here. I know it does not, fortunately.
Antwort von Eva Maier:
@ Host
Are integrated rather than just informed.
/ E
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
He is quite bold: needs a relatively large amount of memory, always sits in the taskbar and runs complacent around slowly ... ? I can not confirm.
The fact that Apple is synonymous cheese, yes, we know allerspätestens since the iPod. But it is not (for me) to individualism. I just think of OS X more than of Windows. Starting with the insert a disc in that it directly on the desktop appears and I am out of there by the contents click. So, as I understand it from Amiga, Atari and even of C64 GEOS knew. Windows even then I found strange (pre 3.11).
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Another mystery Maier. Insiders know what is meant here. I know it does not, fortunately. Women - who can understand them?
Seriously, Eva, if you have no idea, just let the pen of the keyboard ...
Antwort von Chezus:
Eternal vs. Microsoft. Apple gestreite. Both have advantages and disadvantages. I got my MacPro with more advantages than disadvantages in the field of video editing, so I bought him.
Of course many say: Really? You have a Mac? And, as is the case? ...
but because I was not cool to
In particular, Photoshop on the Mac (with Expose) is a boon to the Mac and Windows that is not nearly as well right. Certainly not with Vista. That's why I stay now synonymous with Apple. Indeed, until Microsoft so far is the workflow in such a way that you can work just as nicely with a Mac, Apple is once again a bit next.
That is my view. Can anyone say what he wants
Antwort von PLux:
Thanks Chezus,
that was a very balanced contribution and I can only agree with you.
One should not forget:
Software development costs an awful lot of time, money, resources. If Apple is now just its Quicktime player wants to protect, then this may be after monopolistic behavior, but Apple is the right anyway. Those that might interfere, can indeed synonymous a completely separate player (btw gibts ja sowas synonymous). If it succeeded, would certainly be very great. Only: who would use it? Why we all use Quicktime? Because it is a standard. And standards are unfortunately a curse and blessing of the IT industry at the same time.
To bad Microsoft or Apple may be the unification of Windows or Mac is and will remain in force for the normal user a blessing. Be honest: who really works consistently only with Open Source? Beginning of Linux over the vulture knows what else?
Would we all do, RedHat or Novell would be next s.Pranger monopolists. Incidentally, Google was not synonymous times of "cool Revoluzer" that Microsoft has taken the ass? And what now?
In übrgigen is the discussion about the pros and cons of Mac over Windows a discussion which, as it seems to me most certainly of people kept, the s.eine have lots of time and b) probably in the rarest cases professionally with the one or the other work. I know hardly a professional from the video field, with which such discussions would stop. This is mostly the "regulars" on leave, but in the actual production of stressful no matter.
Antwort von Chezus:
Besides, you can always have the VLC player drauf Haun. The plays I think everything, even corrupted files. He is not the strongest player but in vain.
