Infoseite // Purchase Tip: HC1 or HC3, DCR-SR90?



Frage von Amico:


Hello,

which of these cams would you recommend: SonyHC1, or HC3, DCR-SR90? Movies usually in the open, by day and with Tripod, many sports movies, but synonymous landscapes, etc. The important thing would be a simple and fast processing s.PC (currently AMD 3000, 1GB Ram). Films are mainly on the Internet, as would be the ideal SR90 scene processing, etc. In order already on the action. But you never know whether the material is not synonymous times in higher quality for Fersehen or as needed and then it is a pity, for good shots, what you already think, or at least SR90 HD?

There are serious alternatives to Sony? Price range until about 1500 ¬

Thank you very much!

Amico

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

I opted for HDV, because I already had adequate visual and editing capabilities. Enschieden I have to call me for various reasons SonyHDR-HC3, for example because of better opportunities LowLight to HDMI connector, compact size for traveling as a couple of points to ...
Your equipment and the priorities are not known to halt, or even knew what you will do.

Space


Antwort von Amico:

The size is so important to me .. so I would prefer HC1 over the HC3 when this has an external Micro entrance.

The important thing is the quality of the films and the easy or quick process s.PC And this is with HD not as easy ode cost, right?

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

You see, I did not know that you need an external micro-input. I'm with the built-in Micro HC3 very happy and I can synonymous other external Micros Sonyfür of the intelligent accessory shoe you a bit more. I need it not.

The quality of the "movies" of HC3 camcorder is OK to Lowlight I have already said something.

Easy and fast processing is synonymous s.PC possible, depending on the equipment hold, it is, after all HDV.

What do you understand the "cost"?
The tape just costs a lot ... as for miniDV, HDV video editing program is available for 100 ¬ uro, Network Player p.160 ¬ uro, HDTV s.ca. 1000 ¬ uro ...

Space


Antwort von Amico:

For the first time many thanks for your answer to my question!

On what kind of calculator do you work? I have an AMD 3000 with 1 GB of memory belongs to this cut (in real time) for HDV aussreicht not required, for example, AVID and the specific hardware. Zurezit I'm working with Pinnacle 8 and with the 10 version could be cut synonymous HD. Only I have no idea what I need to work on the Calculator pleasant liquid.

Needed as I said at present only the Internet version of the film, however, find that a shame if, at the same price I can buy an HD Camera take why an SR90? Due to get longer recording time on the hard drive or less Bearbeitszeit to the cause of the action onto the Internet? If you really do make less work or not?

Thank you!

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

With a P4-3, 2GHz, 2GB RAM, FSB800, S-ATA-FP and GraKa 128MB Nvidia FX5200 and Pinnacle Studio 10 works pros native DV editing with me quite well. But I cut synonymous with EDIUS Pro 3 and with Premiere Pro 2.0 (my favorite program!). Why, you could take a SR90, you must consider yourself. The workload DV - / HDV DV editing is identical, if one applies identisceh functions. The render into an HDV-end format takes longer, but you must observe in any case, the progress bar, the PC can do all alone for you while you devote yourself to other work.

Unfortunately I do not know what stuff do you cut to "imagine (in real time)"?
If you have set the razor blade for a cut is taken for granted in real time ...

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash