Frage von muecke:
Hello Filmer,
would like to upgrade to digital camcorders. Since I am not a great filmmaker and would like to keep only small events, hands me a einfacheund priced version. On the Internet, I searched for camcorders and came across this on Aiptek. Of the types of quality DV 8900 and DV M1 seems to be quite good. The quality and performance, but fall out unteschiedlich and move between good and sufficient. Wr may have experience with any of the camcorder and tell me whether the picture quality of the films is good or bad?
Thank you for your efforts.
Muecke
Antwort von AndyZZ:
If I understood correctly, then the Aiptek things there are digital cameras with the usual video capabilities. But that has nothing with digital video à la miniDV or pretend to. If you want to shoot properly, you come s.einem miniDV camcorder not pass. Forget the Aiptek dung. They have max 640x480 Resolutionbei 30 fps, that's not even PAL.
Antwort von dvfreak:
Srimmt exactly ..
iff you are beginner-synonymous, although you get no right at 150 ¬ mini-DV and less than 300 ¬ and I can only NV-GS27 panasonic of you recommend going to see for himself the multiple test winner in the cam area is less than 300 ¬. And with such a device you are 100 times better off with this aptik ald-kram.
Antwort von Burner87:
If you compare the quality of camcorders with correct level class, then the results are sobering. Especially when panning and many scenes in motion a strong pixelation is visible. Allegemeine the colors are faded and the sound is bad. The 640x480 pixels will be achieved only with the Mpeg4 codec, which offers no real good picture quality. If you want to rotate just once a year which, it is still just OK (but only because it is a 300 ¬ camcorder makes no sense), for everything about it is not at all useless.
With each normal digicam man can achieve such a quality synonymous.
Antwort von Markus:
If you want to rotate just once a year what, then ... ... I would not buy a camcorder, but to borrow one. ;-)
My answer to the above question is in the video forum:
Quality of Aiptek camcorders
Antwort von Holly:
I had yesterday the "honor" to try out with a friend, the Aiptek 8800neo Multi-Functional Camcorder 8 Mega, which is offered at various providers already for 130 ¬.
My friend told me he was very pleased with the device. When asked why not Panasonic, Canon or he Sonysagte me, were too expensive and not better (!). (I have a SonyDCR-HC had 44).
Well, it says it all, I did not rob him, so the illusions. The device itself: I found it amazing accessories: a tripod, bag, earphone, software, to name only the most important thing. Okay, all of the cheaper variety, but still, I was slightly surprised.
It was immediately clear to me that the camcorder itself will no longer be able to offer much and it was synonymous. Modest capabilities, a display with miserable Resolutionund a case in which one always had the impression that it would soon break up.
Okay, I said to myself, if the picture would at least be tidy, you could still give a good grade.
In "normal" daylight it did not look bad. Sure, the colors were very pale, but still acceptable. Nevertheless, I somehow had the impression that my digital camera would make better videos. Speaking of digital camera, the photos were also very pale, which is clearly a sign of totally obsolete technology.
Then came the soothsayer, with many camcorders, these are Image Stabilization and the low light performance, because there simply good electronics is required. And here's the thing, as expected, failed miserably.
Every little jerky swing that thing like an earthquake of magnitude 8 and darkness for light, the picture remained synonymous really dark and the LCD screen roared, as I had never seen before.
Where's my friend wanted to see the "good" image quality, I was not clear, but sometimes silence is golden.
Conclusion: who is somehow able to easily pay 200-300 ¬ more for a camcorder that should do it, it's worth it.
This device is really only for completely unpretentious filmmakers who have little money. I'm surprised really, but that seems quite a few are passionate about this scrap, I can not understand it, is not synonymous with a lot of understanding. Even the price for this camcorder was still too expensive.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
On the Internet, I searched for camcorders and came across this on Aiptek. Muhaahhhahhhaahhh! Rolling on the floor ....
Tschulligung - was just my arrogant phase :-) But Aiptek and camcorder in one sentence is almost as good as Dieter Bohlen and Music, or Dieter Bohlen and level, or Dieter Bohlen and etiquette ... (continued)
Antwort von Jan:
Muecke, still waiting for the next week. My Week 48 chain has a proper MiniDV camera for under ¬ 200 on offer - this is not of Samsung (See the video sector are not very good), but one of the 4 best / biggest consumer companies. And an updated 2006-spec model. Then with the business purchase benefits (service, no shipping, secure a warranty) and take immediately. Yes, unfortunately, one Aiptek is synonymous here ....
VG
Jan
Antwort von Markus:
... a proper MiniDV Camera for under ¬ 200 on offer ... Oh dear, what have saved the Manufacturer this time? By decoupling Microphone, Microphone, Headphones and Lanc-port, CCD size, knick-knacks, ... Perhaps the Optics? ;-)
Antwort von Mora57:
Yes
gabs ever in the sixty and was called "Voice Recorder"
Back to the Roots ...
Antwort von Jan:
Yes the Internet gibts already some companies in the so-Einstiegscamcordern with dispatch so located around 230 ¬.
In most shops for 200 ¬ gabs ne mostly Samsung - sorry, the company is not bad, but its the cameras are clearly off the beaten track.
There will be a JVC!
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
The JVC from Saturn's advertising, unfortunately, comes only Week 50, for users who are curious.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Markus:
Anyway, I'm looking forward to the then probably even longer faces of all those users who set the demands s.einen camcorder to a device for ¬ 2,500 to carry out difficult and will ultimately have recourse only to the devices at 300 ¬. Those will look now probably in the range around 200 ¬ ... * hihi *
I know it's schadenfreude, but sometimes it does pretty well synonymous when a home video maker that greed targeting on a (very dark) event total disbelief, the display of a VX2100 compares with that of his camcorder! * wide-grin *
Antwort von pco:
So you want to compare something that is about 10x more expensive.
I think there might be synonymous with a Fiat Punto comparing a Ferrari.
) Some people (to stay with the symbol of wanting to simply drive only car, while others want to enjoy it synonymous. And some can afford a Ferrari, some not.
It is only halt the question of whether it is not worthwhile, at least on a na. Let's say a ... Save on VW Polo.
...
But relating to. Who wants to have a halfway decent camera, without having to make big concessions, it must simply stop investing EUR 700 - without accessories.
One can not seriously expect that a EUR 200 Camera is a high quality and processed without sacrificing everything is working fine.
It is therefore synonymous with the Aiptek "things" is not the question: "You PERMIT compete with a real camera?" but rather "Are they even worth your money?"
And if you know exactly what you get, then they are already. Example Aiptek Z300HD. For one quick n funny video or n Stillimage the Cam is pretty good. Moreover, it is small and therefore quickly drawn. Good for the kiddies and for party movies.
For real video films, she is completely overwhelmed. Yes even at the beginning of the Battery runtime of just over 1 hour at, and hears the lack Frambuffer modest Micro ... on.
But for me ne Aiptek has designed this really surprised!
PCO
PS: There's something to read it here:
http://www.orthy.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4963&Itemid=85
