Frage von brettmatt:
Hi, similar questions were frequently asked, but unfortunately I can not find what could solve my problem.
I would be delighted to your answer.
Problem: The Mini-DV Camera (; SonyDCR-HC51), I have purchased
s.Television has a very good quality.
But I want to have videos on my laptop
And they like to edit.
So I bought a Firewire cable and so my
Mini-DV camera connected.
After I had angschlossen them, I was asked
if I want to import it with "Windows Movie Maker.
This is what I was doing synonymous.
A window opened with format specifications.
I have "Audio - Video Interleaved (, a file)
AVI (where about 13GB per hour) "is selected.
The UK is the highest rate in Windows Movie Maker.
I then import the video and leave with the
Import Video begun.
When it was finished, I have looked at the video and was
horrified, because the quality was so bad / is, although
the file so memory consuming.
So I next recharchiert.
I had no answer and the majority felt that it
Windows Movie Maker is different and I
Cut Programs need.
So I've downloaded a few trial versions like
-Pinnacle Studio 12
Corel VideoStuido 11
-Adobe Premiere Pro
Nevertheless, without success, all the videos with the same
Quality.
Have the videos in MPEG 1, MPEG 2, and DV-AVI
changed and is still bad for the eyes.
Is it perhaps s.der Sony Mini-DV Camera?
But I do not guess, because the quality s.Television super
is.
On the laptop it is probably not synonymous, since it is new.
I definitely want to the video on the laptop
And maybe when they edit reinstellen YOUTUBE.
It would be really great if someone a solution for my
Problem.
Thank you, I'll wait for your answers!
Antwort von heimax:
The preview quality is with the quality of output does not compare.
S.den NLE's add the preview quality to the highest level. If your lap-top without the jerk played along to. Or, even easier to create a DVD and rate the quality as the output.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
DV material provides a high resolution TFT with nunmal are quite limited - in contrast to a CRT monitor with SD resolution. On your camcorder, it is not, I can assure you.
The display of your notebook probably has a resolution of 1280x800 pixels. Thus, the DV material is reduced by the factor of 2.5 as shown scaled to the top of what the eye is not so smart. ;)
Antwort von brettmatt:
Thanks for your fast answers and got the video tape to DVD to burn. The quality of the DVD is better than on my hard drive, but still not as good as the original, if I do it via the television camera.
But as I said, I do not want to look at the video s.Television.
I want to edit it and reinstellen in Youtube.
Check for new replies, I'd be very happy.
Thank you very much!
Antwort von Meggs:
The quality of the DVD is better than on my hard drive, but still not as good as the original, if I do it via the television camera.
The video on your plate is better in any case, when the resulting DVD. Where have you looked at them? On television, or on your laptop?
How then does the video on your notebook, in Comparison to Standard Youtube videos?
How and with what players you look at the video on the laptop? Full screen - or 100% image size, or smaller?
Antwort von brettmatt:
I've looked at the burned DVD s.Television and s.Notebook.
The DVD has better quality than if I did in DV-AVI and import it memory.
But if I use an AV cable and s.Television look at the camera with the videotape, which is much much better quality than the burned DVD.
On the notebook I have the DV-AVI videos always with
"Windwos Media PLayer 11" looked at.
At 100% sau, the quality is bad and you can see many dots.
But if I do not look at the size of 100%, but in the small window, then the quality is actually quite good.
But, unfortunately, just too small. (; Even with "VLC PLAYER" poor quality)
The DVD I have looked s.Television and s.Notebook.
Using Windows Media Player can not look at it.
So I looked at it with "VLC PLAYER".
The quality of the DVD is better than the DV-AVI.
Even at 100% size.
But I need the video in DV AVI format.
Antwort von Markus73:
But I need the video in DV AVI format. Why? This is unsuitable for your purposes. Mach doch mal a WMV, Mpeg2, Mpeg4, etc. therefrom.
Regards,
Markus
Antwort von brettmatt:
Well WMV would be synonymous to go, but the quality is still just as bad.
I somehow can not find a solution to my problem.
In other answers I would be very happy.
Thank you very much!
Antwort von Markus73:
Well WMV would be synonymous to go, but the quality is still just as bad. Then something is going wrong. DV-AVI is ideal for editing, but certainly not the final format in order to show them. A good optical WMV is likely to differ not too much of the original source.
Regards,
Markus
Antwort von brettmatt:
Thanks Mark for your responses.
But I'm not next in some way.
I need to solve the problem as quickly as possible.
Add me Can someone in ICQ or MSN?
Then I can still synonymous accurate to say!
send me an email, do you want me Add fals and I will give you my ICQ number or send MSN name.
My email: syousen@hotmail.de
Antwort von Meggs:
The DVD has better quality than if I did in DV-AVI and import it memory.
DV-AVI file format is definitely a better quality than MPEF2 on the DVD.
I can only explain that for some reason your computer can handle it properly with DV-AVI.
Do take a little time Schipsel (; how bad it may always synonymous lookout) (on your video, 1min), walk into the MPEG2 or wmv, and look at this outcome. You can do it synonymous to test upload to Youtube and watch the results.
Antwort von brettmatt:
So I opened the DVD, then the VIDEO-TS folder open, put the video and converted it to a WMV FORMAT.
The video quality is still bad and it caused even two black edges s.den pages.
Antwort von Markus73:
For these tests, ideally you should take the DV file from source material, not the (; already heavily precompressed) DVD.
Have you ever s.den encoder settings or the bit rate rotated?
Regards,
Markus
Antwort von Meggs:
I meant 1 snippet from the DV-AVI thou shalt convert to MPEG2 and then compare with the DVD or just upload to youtube. The DVD is already in MPEG2 format.
The DV-AVI is identical with the video tape on the. These are the same data.
Antwort von brettmatt:
So have now synonymous the DV-AVI file converted to WMV.
Unfortunately, the quality was just bad.
I even changed the settings several times and yet the quality is poor.
In MPEG2 format it is synonymous to deteriorate.
What should I do?
Thanks for all bisheriegen answers!
Antwort von Meggs:
So have now synonymous the DV-AVI file converted to WMV.
Unfortunately, the quality was just bad.
I even changed the settings several times and yet the quality is poor.
In MPEG2 format it is synonymous to deteriorate.
What should I do?
Thanks for all bisheriegen answers! Why do not the things I've said a few times: Charge it up to Youtube and compare them with other Youtube videos.
Your information is not plausible. You said in your computer sees the video of the DVD better than the DV-AVI. If you, the DV-AVI conversion into MPEG 2, it is supposedly worse.
The DVD also contains the video as MPEG2.
Antwort von brettmatt:
Well, I do not know why it became worse after I have converted the DV-AVI file to MPEG 2nd
On Youtube, the DV-AVI one more time was bad .............
Real funny!
Antwort von Meggs:
Gib doch mal nen link to Youtube, so we can see how things look
Antwort von brettmatt:
I schonmal a video that I myself have taken
Uploaded (; DV-AVI) at youtube and saw the quality synonymous bad, then I deleted the video again.
But I've just recorded something and would einfachso reinstellen it in youtube. Lasts 10 minutes is still uploaded it.
Then I'll call you the link and I could see you the quality.
Antwort von brettmatt:
I quickly received a video and converted it to DV-AVI.
The video is now uploaded and you can you look at the quality.
* Do not worry about the people who talk in the background.
Link:
Antwort von brettmatt:
I would be delighted if there still are other answers.
Thank you very much!
Antwort von heimax:
The only thing I find konte with dirty lens is filmed in the light, it is impossible to achieve a better quality.
Antwort von gunman:
Hello,
've Watched the video and I can only say the quality is just like a resolution of 720x576 is just now (; exception of the light, etc.). You can do whatever you want, you have only SD and not HD video.
It is quite normal that looks like an SD video (; DV AVI) on a computer screen that has a higher resolution than your tube TV for example (or, if it is such a bad with PAL resolution), which explains some outposts have been.
Creating a DVD from a DV AVI file synonymous out can bring a better quality because the video is compressed and loses s.Qualität. The best output quality is and remains DV AVI!
You can leave a self-produced DVD with SD material micht not compare a good purchase DVD, for here are quite different (; used not for amateurs bezalhlbare encoders etc and what I do not know everything). In this forum have been synonymous professionals geäusserst this, but I do not where you can find it.
So, you do not make a Kummr, SD is SD and HD is HD.
Once again, the video quality is ok for me
Gunman
Antwort von brettmatt:
Thank you very much.
This means that it looks only on my laptop so and not in others, or what?
Another note.
With Pinaccle Studio 12 is in DV import after it has finished impotiert, stands at properties (; with right-click) on the video that there is a
AVI is video.
Perhaps it is not a DV-AVI and I thought that it is DV-AVI.
Does DV-AVI synonymous with properties of the video stand for?
Antwort von gunman:
Also, it has nothing to do with your laptop or any other laptop or prompt. Once the screen a different resolution than PAL (; 720x576), has - and the flat screens have all-then the video looks bad!
AVI is only the name of the Transportkontainers. In the AVI container can be different files, including DV synonymous.
Gunman
Antwort von brettmatt:
The quality is worse than a digital camera or a cell phone.
When I bought the camera, I've synonymous asked if the mini-DV camera is easy to handle and has a good quality on the PC.
The said yes.
And a friend told me synonymous of a mini-Dv Camera, but the camera is (very old, old) 5years and still has a great quality on your computer.
Who can help me not synonymous.
I just do not understand if the quality is so, then I bought them for nothing. = (;
Antwort von gunman:
The quality is worse than a digital camera or a cell phone.
When I bought the camera, I've synonymous asked if the mini-DV camera is easy to handle and has a good quality on the PC.
The said yes.
And a friend told me synonymous of a mini-Dv Camera, but the camera is (very old, old) 5years and still has a great quality on your computer.
Who can help me not synonymous.
I just do not understand if the quality is so, then I bought them for nothing. = (; So once again:
You're writing yourself the quality "s.Television" was very good. If it is a CRT TV with PAL resolution is, then your camera is OK!
If the quality of the camera is your friend in your eyes on the computer a better quality than yours, so the camera can lie s.der indeed synonymous selbt. There was very good, and git Mini DV cameras (and Canon XM 1 XM2 SonyVX 2100-Panasonic 3 CCD Chipper .. everything that determined (better quality than your current camera, do not you write that your friend has Camera) BUT in direct Comparison of these "better cams" when played on CRT TVs, and flat screen, is synonymous for these cameras the same problem, and you will notice the difference very well.
There are (for now no solution except Hig definition, but then with all the consequences of this) are if you want to have a better resolution flat panel displays.
I would suggest to you here in the forum once a study of video films on various basics, everything else remains for you a Book with Seven Seals, and every salesperson can tell you what he wants.
PS there are of course synonymous highly qualified vendors like öz.B. "Jan" of synonymous here is active in the forum.
Gunman
Gunman
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Sach mal nen guys have ... your silly season??
Thus
DV-AVI does s.Calculator always schei ** s out.
First of upscale because of the images because of the second interlaced.
..........................
A DVD is less and less data throughput rate as a DV-AVI
...........................
Black streaks s.der Page since coming through the state of an SD cam films no 16:9 and thus the 4:3 material right and left 2 strips get (; or it is blown up to 16:9)
...........................
Your camera is therefore not synonymous not break your calculator!
...........................
Settings are as follows
Deinterlace the footage is when an Internet video is to be created - s.besten of the Rohclip an MP4 with sound mp3 (; Youtube for example in resolution 640x480)
A DVD should be created as a 4:3 project (in interlaced processes, so with interlaced aka fields) wav sound and video in the MPEG2 codec
..............................
That clearly indicate apparent differences in SD can, yes, that is partly dependent of the used camera - it would be the logical bad if not synonymous.
All in all, it was all right, your camera is ok and ddie quality is just as it is - namely SD Video!
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von gunman:
Sach mal nen guys have ... your silly season??
Thus
DV-AVI does s.Calculator always schei ** s out.
First of upscale because of the images because of the second interlaced.
..........................
A DVD is less and less data throughput rate as a DV-AVI
...........................
Black streaks s.der Page since coming through the state of an SD cam films no 16:9 and thus the 4:3 material right and left 2 strips get (; or it is blown up to 16:9)
...........................
Your camera is therefore not synonymous not break your calculator!
...........................
Settings are as follows
Deinterlace the footage is when an Internet video is to be created - s.besten of the Rohclip an MP4 with sound mp3 (; Youtube for example in resolution 640x480)
A DVD should be created as a 4:3 project (in interlaced processes, so with interlaced aka fields) wav sound and video in the MPEG2 codec
..............................
That clearly indicate apparent differences in SD can, yes, that is partly dependent of the used camera - it would be the logical bad if not synonymous.
All in all, it was all right, your camera is ok and ddie quality is just as it is - namely SD Video!
MfG
B. DeKid Dear B. DeKID,
Why should I have a summer slump??
A user makes a few questions and get some answers. Of course, I do not possess YOUR "professional knowledge", but in the essence of your answers are synonymous none other than MY.
I honestly do not know what you mean by that?
Gunman
Antwort von B.DeKid:
See Lock Gunman
Your posts have had it even to the point, is ja ok ... but first nen s.dem thread doctoring around half a day to be not his, that I meant.
Therefore you must expect from the silly season out,-P
AND PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE - well, I do not think this is the so-rather nem Objectively good fortune apprehension.
But oh well --- my statement of apology, all summer slump.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von gunman:
No problem!
Can you believe the weather forecast, so the summer is yet to come, at least here in Luxembourg ...
Good night together,
Gunman
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Yes let's hope for the times I again s.The Mosel to Trier to fish come ;-)
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von KSProduction:
I quickly received a video and converted it to DV-AVI.
The video is now uploaded and you can you look at the quality.
* Do not worry about the people who talk in the background.
Link:
This quality is not bad. no artifacts, no blurred. great for ne Mittelprächtige cam right. the reflections by the glasscheibe filmed by the sun is normal and in accordance with the conditions.
Consider that a video is uploaded by nachomtimiert youTube and you have to wait about 30min until the end result is. So this is not bad! Schaus to you again!
Antwort von carstenkurz:
The technical quality is not bad.
Funny, triangular iris ...
A little tip, if not synonymous, I believe that you want to really invest in an ND filter, but at least with higher shutter speed to get the suppressed synonymous: Especially in light and Wide Anglesieht one of these vast quantities of cheap zoom lens reflections, iris images and mud closes on the front lens - mainly because in a lot of light, the iris and the depth increases sharply. In your test shot we see almost more of these reflections as the actual motive ;-)
-> Reduce light, not absorb from the sun, lens cleaning, use neutral density filter, or if necessary raufsetzen shutter speed so far that the aperture due to 'lack of light' rises again. The latter can cause unwanted Stroboeffekte course, synonymous. An ND filter is complicated, but the best.
- Carsten
Antwort von Markus73:
Link:
And now tell us what it is to be poor or what you were expecting you!
The picture is sharp, no visible artifacts, lighting, colors, everything is as it should be. Or?
Regards,
Markus
Antwort von Meggs:
@ brett matt
I have already written at least 3 times, you should compare your video to Youtube youtube'videos with others. Yours is no worse than others, rather better than some. So where is the problem? The fact that most poor lookout videos in youtube as sRöhrenfernseher?
This is due to technical reasons, and has nothing to do with your camera.
Antwort von brettmatt:
I think the quality is poor!
That with the sun was a mistake, as I quickly added it and it wanted to show you only.
This is a video without people, so if you of one man takes up a video, you see the eyes, etc. do not, but dots.
I have compared the synonymous Videos and mine think bad.
Antwort von DeeZiD:
SD (; PAL) interlaced with the LCD. : D
No, that simply can not end well.
In the DVX100 you could save that time still so good, progressive record. The recordings were comparatively rich in detail. Other DV cameras could kloppen in contrast to the ton, especially many consumer models, whose bruising few years ago, I even had to cut more ... : (;
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von Meggs:
This is a video without people, so if you of one man takes up a video, you see the eyes, etc. do not, but dots.
I have compared the synonymous Videos and mine think bad. An average of an SD video camera in this price range. You really should clean the smudged lens.
Sure - there are better synonymous videos on Youtube, but they are made with better cameras.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Brett matt
It can be synonymous with the quality requirements exaggerate!
So there are 3 possibilities
1. You bought the camera for less than 2 weeks (; online) the you can convert
2. You have to have long, so you can sell it used, of course, with one against the purchase price Cons
3. You can clean the lens to begin with and make your wonderful videos, which are more than ok.
..................................
If you now think the rush that you have chosen and an HD Camera (; was v) be better, well then buy an HD (v) Camera.
But to tell the picture is bad or even grottig .... naja so extravagantly, and then you'll exaggerate with HD (; synonymous v) not be more satisfied .... and maybe you should find another hobby.
MfG
B. DeKid
The sentence
This is a video without people, so if you of one man takes up a video, you see the eyes, etc. do not, but dots. is on jedenfall nen riesen nonsense!
Because if you can see here, as even the grass 3-5 m structure then you will probably synonymous one eye can see a strand of hair and mouth and nose of your protagonist.
Should this not be the case, is the obvious Probllem to ... well, yourself.
Antwort von gunman:
@ Brett matt
It can be synonymous with the quality requirements exaggerate!
So there are 3 possibilities
1. You bought the camera for less than 2 weeks (; online) the you can convert
2. You have to have long, so you can sell it used, of course, with one against the purchase price Cons
3. You can clean the lens to begin with and make your wonderful videos, which are more than ok.
Hi,
In the English Parliament the deputies call "yeaaah" synonymous with the consent and I am beginning to think that you "matt board" you the answers given here in the forum but should Nehem even properly to the breast, rather than always nagging next.
Gunman
..................................
If you now think the rush that you have chosen and an HD Camera (; was v) be better, well then buy an HD (v) Camera.
But to tell the picture is bad or even grottig .... naja so extravagantly, and then you'll exaggerate with HD (; synonymous v) not be more satisfied .... and maybe you should find another hobby.
MfG
B. DeKid
The sentence This is a video without people, so if you of one man takes up a video, you see the eyes, etc. do not, but dots. is on jedenfall nen riesen nonsense!
Because if you can see here, as even the grass 3-5 m structure then you will probably synonymous one eye can see a strand of hair and mouth and nose of your protagonist.
Should this not be the case, is the obvious Probllem to ... well, yourself.
 |
Antwort von gunman:
Sorry
HPs I missed you type.
Here's my text:
Hi,
In the English Parliament the deputies call "yeaaah" synonymous with the consent and I am beginning to think that you "matt board" you the answers given here in the forum but should Nehem even properly to the breast, rather than always nagging next.
Gunman
..................................
Antwort von brettmatt:
Thank s.alle have helped me.
Well I have to stop living it.
I then edit the videos on your computer and burn the video as a DVD format and gucke it to me on a DVD player.
From Youtube is unfortunately nothing. = (;
One question I would have.
When I transmuted my video into a DVD, what settings do I need to take the best quality.
Extra in - Pinnacle Studio 12
Die with a question mark, I do not know!
Disc Type = DVD
Filetype =?? DivX, MPEG1/2/4, AVI, Flash Video, MOV,
SonyPSP, 3GP, etc.
Default =?? Small, medium, full
And other settings.
I know there is not unfortunately.
Oh yes, and when selecting disc type I synonymous "HD DVD, SVCD, VCD, etc..
So thank you!
Antwort von heimax:
Who can read instruction manuals is a clear advantage. You can not upload your film to DVD reconversion, but as MPG 2 burn to a DVD.
Basically, the program is self-explanatory, but a little thought is still one of them.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Thus
first, clearly you can upload the videos on Youtube
either gestrecht at 1280x720 or 640x480
you to use the SUPER Progi of eRightSoft and doing after cutting raw files from a MP4 file and send it to Youtube, the quality is clean.
..............................
DVD's are always Mpeg 2 with a wav sound
.................................
MfG
B. DeKid
PS: Remember when you INet edition uses the function Deinterlaced (; No. fields) for DVDs and just let the clip as it comes out of the action, that is interlaced with aka half frames.
Einfach mal in wiki interlaced DVD and enter.
PS2: I hope you have a UV filter on the front of the lens, if not you should go and buy one!
Antwort von brettmatt:
My last question:
Can you upload the vob file in the DVD on Youtube?
If so then my problem would be solved and I was really happy because the quality of the DVD is great.
If I can Environ synonymous the file without quality loss, then it is synonymous well.
Antwort von DeeZiD:
Upload to youtube better always 16:9.
Also cropping up and down, deinterlace and resize to 640x360px.
Then as the whole. Mp4 file with x264Codec (; 4Mbit rich relaxed () and MP3, to save here at best, with lame-use preset standard).
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von Meggs:
Can you upload the vob file in the DVD on Youtube?
If so then my problem would be solved and I was really happy because the quality of the DVD is great.
If I can Environ synonymous the file without quality loss, then it is synonymous well. The VOB file is good, MPEG2 and DV-AVI are bad. Aha.
You can rename the VOB to MPG and then upload. Whether they will be worse in your eyes, I can not judge. Normally not, because it contains the same video stream that is only slightly different packaging. But who knows how it will be in your case ...
Antwort von shipoffools:
...
One question I would have.
When I transmuted my video into a DVD, what settings do I need to take the best quality.
Extra in - Pinnacle Studio 12
Die with a question mark, I do not know!
Disc Type = DVD
Filetype =?? DivX, MPEG1/2/4, AVI, Flash Video, MOV,
SonyPSP, 3GP, etc.
Default =?? Small, medium, full
And other settings.
I know there is not unfortunately.
Oh yes, and when selecting disc type I synonymous "HD DVD, SVCD, VCD, etc..
...! Kenn 'Pinnacle Studio not (luckily ...: o)
but at every editing program that reasonably good for what, you can change the following settings:
All settings
for DV / Pal: File format (, or) File type:
For DVD must
always be "elected MPEG2.
(; MP4 eg YouTube)
Field order (; called synonymous as "image type"):
For DVD "Lower Field First" (; = bottom field first), (; synonymous've heard that in some "upper field first" should work better, but DV is numal "lower first "...).
(; Progressively for PC = Progressive scan synonymous or "image-based")
Resolution: DVD Pal = 720 x 576 pixels
(; eg HDV = 1440 x 1080)
Aspect Ratio: DV (, SD) = 4:3
HDV = 16:9
Frame Rate: 25 frames / sec. (; = Fps)
Bitrate (; =) Data rate:
Always set as high as possible (; best adjustable quality for DVD = 8000 kbps CBR (; = constant). However, the higher the bit rate, the lower the time of the material that fits on the DVD. In 8000 kbps constant fit 60 min . drauf (; at 4.7 GB).
8000 variably setting a few minutes longer be (too, depending on the material ...). ) Less than 6000 kbps variable (; = VBR should not go at all. Just try out a few times and overdone blanks "" ...
(; PS: bit rate can be expressed in bps synonymous, then it would be 8000 instead of just 8000000)
GOP: closed GOP, picture Number 12
If it's still 'there ne option like
"segment coding" or
"Smart Render" or
"fast rendering", it means that material in the timeline will be applied to no effect, so to speak, the "raw" happens faster when rendering can be processed when the options are selected.
Linear PCM
audio MPEG1 or with 224 or 256 (choose kbps, 192 kbps do it but usually synonymous ... saves a little space). (Stereo, mono, or AC3, Dolby = 5.1) should be clear anyway.
... and if there's somewhere to set something, because of contact: the quality or speed: more quality on the highest value (, usually 100%)
Greeting
shipoffools
PS: To the above-mentioned "Disk-TYPE": DV = SD = 720 x 576, so stink normal "DVD"
Addendum:
If there is the possibility of "square pixels" or "non-square Pixelrendern choose" to:
"square pixels" = for (and most) PC Monitors
"non-square pixels" = for TV, so for the "classic" D
Antwort von KSProduction:
I think the quality is poor!
That with the sun was a mistake, as I quickly added it and it wanted to show you only.
This is a video without people, so if you of one man takes up a video, you see the eyes, etc. do not, but dots.
I have compared the synonymous Videos and mine think bad. oh .... the video weia you have compared with others .... naja ..... if you compare them with the false and the model with more expensive cams filmed was, moreover of professionals, then I'd say: thought it wrong!
Antwort von KSProduction:
This is a video without people, so if you of one man takes up a video, you see the eyes, etc. do not, but dots.
I have compared the synonymous Videos and mine think bad.
An average of an SD video camera in this price range. You really should clean the smudged lens.
Sure - there are better synonymous videos on Youtube, but they are made with better cameras. quite right! there is not too great a price differentials brauchts. my panasonic GS150 to GS500 makes much better my other videos at the same setting for youTube-upload! And there are only about 400 euro dazuwischen and some better components inside.
let our comrades times a video comparing who has himself ne cam which costs between 500 and 1000 (; no idea what his costs, habs not read), he compares them with recordings of the professionals have ne cam 3000 euro and thinks nothing here .... tz tz ....
