Frage von NetKilla-2k1:
I have (synonymous in this forum) have already had some built-in Microphone The XH-A1 read.
Ultimately, however, is still a practical question. I have yet a Canon XL2 and use the included microphone for reportage. But I had me a "cat" (windshield) were purchased. With this final quality, I was actually very pleased.
If I am now the XH-A1 Canon of this and buy a suitable windbreak for Integrated Microphone, then the quality should be as good as me in term of XL2 or variant, it is necessary an external Micro Camera on the bandwagon?
Did someone experience?
Thank you.
Gruß,
Netti
Antwort von Axel:
If I am now the XH-A1 Canon of this and buy a suitable windbreak for Integrated Microphone, then the quality should be as good as me in term of XL2 or variant, it is necessary an external Micro Camera on the bandwagon? Come on to the reportage. Naturatmo, etc. goes for Language (interviews) are not. This camera now have so many, you can determine your view somewhere.
Antwort von Markus:
... or is it necessary an external Micro Camera on the bandwagon? This comes on the recording situation. Since the camera location is equal to the microphone location, may be the subject (= the sound source) is not too far away there. With increasing distance reduces to the desired, while the ambient noise increase. Sometime you have only the atmosphere and even if you zoom in the picture could still remain sound but far away.
To view additional Microphones always make sense then, when the sound source and camcorder / Microphone does not come close enough (can).
Antwort von j.k.:
Can someone of the quality of the built with Micro-recorded sound (in the xh-a1) report? How bad is it? How bad is it in comparison to the example of integrated micro Z1/FX1?
Is it really significant self noise of the drive to recognize?
Thank you
Yuri
