Frage von Lindow:
Hi,
I have some questions on Motion:
My configuration:
MacPro 3.2 Ghz 10GB Ram, Final Cut Studio 3 with Final Cut Pro 7.0.2 and Motion 4
Motion clips I want to smooth out with car trips. So far, I'm so very useful results.
Now I got a clip in which the first motion-flow is not sufficient. I want to again straighten next (; and vertical rotation).
In addition I have done the following:
The clip in the first run smooth, I saved as a separate Quicktime movie in Final Cut Pro. The thus contained in Comparison to the original one significant improvement. Just because some bouncer were the next should be smoothed. The independent film I have again sent s.Motion, a new analysis, applied more X / Y smoothing (; rotation and vertical) (; different change sizes (, 2.5 to 5) and then exported.
The result is more of a deterioration.
This is inexplicable to me but because of the new film is sent independently and has no relation to the original more (; in Final Cut Pro saved as "independent film"). The still existing small jumper must therefore have been smoothed out next to zero.
I also have the "Analyze trust" worked there visible keyframe curve by the "outliers" to zero have been moved.
This result was not satisfactory.
So I have the following questions:
Application of behavior Stabilize (; method "equally", position and vertical)
1st how can I achieve a further improvement of an already smoothed in Motion "" Clip's?
2nd must stabilize at a clip of any new applications of behavior "to be re-analyzed? (; First applied behavior analysis with new analysis on change of parameters = new analysis?
3rd After the analysis of a clip keyframe curve in the Keyframe Editor to be seen. How to achieve that affect s.dieser curve changes made actually synonymous? I have found that the curve of the original looks like the curve of the new independent film, which already contained a change after the first run. This is inexplicable because both films are already different.
Must be stored once in Motion already edited film may be different than the "independent film"? If so, in what format?
Thanks for quick answers
Antwort von Randoms:
Hello Lindow,
First, I notice that you play as a stand-alone movie with you
not have to / should. From generation to generation, your result will be worse of course.
Send s.Motion to edit your clips with the "Send to" - command. After your editing in Motion speicherst from you, more is not to do. After your clip in Final Cut Pro has motn the ".." So you can integrate the file extension synonymous. Motn in Final Cut Pro and further process the editor is always to create and customize without further generations, which enhances the quality benefit.
You should always look first at the time which codec is the default motion settings. Adjust the settings of your sequence, Final Cut Pro. This too is important.
Which codec do you work in Final Cut Pro?
I recommend for further steps in motion or color the ProResCodecs. I work with HDV and AVCHD footage and capture directly to ProRes422
Related
You do not analyze more than once.
I'm doing it this way:
Clip in Final Cut Pro with s.Motion right Maustatste send.
In Motion Stabiliser I set the behavior to the clip.
Click analyze and then let the clip run in the loop as I first have to check-whether evenly or stabilizer provides a better, more natural result.
Now I check for changes in the selection box Vertical, Horizontal, both ..... the result. The next step I select "Zoom" from the resulting black bands to be zoomed to disappear from the visible range.
If I am satisfied with the adjustment, I press cmd + S for Save and go back in Final Cut Pro, here you will have to render the clip may be, then it should look good.
You must also remember that when the zoom factor to smooth your shaky recording increases over 115%, which is yet to noticeable loss in quality is, what is clear.
Hope to have helped ....
Antwort von Lindow:
Hello Randoms,
thanks for the very good description. I will then try do the same. So that was a misconception on my part - to make a new independent film and to send the.
In Final Cut Pro, I use the codec ProRes 4444, but can adjust synonymous 4222nd In Motion is set to "export" also ProRes 4444th I notice that you only speicherst (save as), not exportierst. The result can be seen in motion but only after it has been exported.
Where you let the loop (loop playback) run. For me it is on the Mac monitor possible but can not be used because the jerky playback, as well as on the output video monitor. Only in Final Cut Pro everything is running smoothly. So I've always exported first, then see in Final Cut Pro is the result. But until then, everything must be processed only perfect.
How do you write that you first look at this loop is the best time on the remedial setting, that would be synonymous s.liebsten me of course, but so far it does not work with this inadequate Wedergabe.
Have you ever tried s.der curve in the Keyframe Editor Analyze confidence to change "anything? I have done this and could in this curve at the tips (you can see very well because the existing wobbler as outliers in the illustrated curve), these peaks reinziehen in the straight curve eleminieren. However, the impact was negligible. [/ Code]
Antwort von Randoms:
Basically you can with cmd + R in Motion can render a RAM preview. Unless it has to come but not even if you get the runterschraubst Resolutionetwas on tab selection (top right of the Motion Canvas), where you can draft off and special quality of light and shadow effects, etc. This saves computing capacity and to look like your rocking clip looks like now you need not really a 100%-resolution thumbnail.
About the Keyframe Editor, as you say in your last paragraph because I have never tried to intervene. I'm with the stability function as I have described so far have been content with each Picture.
Problems makes it more likely if the clip is accompanied during a zoom in / out or pan, then I come with stabilizing "uniformly" as more capable of dealing with. One must not forget the synonymous STABILIZE a "helper function" and not a panacea.
Spells, the function is limited.
You are working with ProRes4444 and sure you need the synonymous? As far as I am informed, take this codec for highest quality film transfer. Unfortunately still do not know now what is your source video codec? Usually one is operated with 422 or 422HQ good. You can make your workflow easier synonymous with a matching ProRes codec, then there is your calculator to do less synonymous and synonymous provides real-time preview your back more.
Thou canst thee times the White Paper to look at the ProResCodecs, as it is explained very well what ProResCodec suitable for which application. Below is an excerpt as a scan, here you see very clearly the course of the data rate.
Antwort von Randoms:
Hello Randoms,
In Final Cut Pro, I use the codec ProRes 4444, but can adjust synonymous 4222nd In Motion is set to "export" also ProRes 4444th I notice that you only speicherst (save as), not exportierst. The result can be seen in motion but only after it has been exported.
. [/ Code] If you have a clip from Final Cut Pro s.Motion sending, then you have Checked "Motion integrate content" and "motion" Open file name can be either or modify. After editing, I save in Motion cmd + p. .. more or not ... I do not need motion, I close it with cmd + Q
In Final Cut Pro now means your clip (eighth time on it) xyz.motn
because you realize that attacks the change. For me, the clip has a render bar, so I must in Final Cut Pro Mark actually use this clip and cmd + R to render him.
The great advantage of the *. motn clips in Final Cut Pro:
1) If you could change again with your generated copies of the played again with a generation loss.
Change 2) Do you remember something, right click on *. motn clip in Final Cut Pro -> Send s.Editor .... Motion opens ... perform change-> Save-> Finish
Antwort von PowerMac:
Analyze several times makes no sense.
Been alone in logical terms.
ProRes 444 is also meaningless.
Antwort von Lindow:
Hello Randoms
Thanks again.
My material is of the
SonyPWM EX3 (XDCAM Ex 1080i). Which Codec You propose - ProRes 4222?
Antwort von Lindow:
Hi,
just schriebPowerMac: 4444 is meaningless. So 42 222?
Antwort von Lindow:
Hi,
the question and check marks are placed after the return of Motion for Final Cut Pro has the file synonymous Annex mtn ". To that extent does das.
Antwort von Randoms:
Hello Randoms
Thanks again.
My material is of the
SonyPWM EX3 (XDCAM Ex 1080i). Which Codec You propose - ProRes 4222? I would take your case to the ProRes422.
Is always synonymous depending on what else should be done with all the material. I have already made synonymous for cutting only works without color correction and compositing very good results with the ProResLT codec.
Antwort von Lindow:
Hello Randoms,
well, then I'll follow your advice
Meanwhile, I have been synonymous initial success, thanks to your good advice. The decisive factor is the reference to the endless loop. I have used in motion now and let the clip in question and run the loop while I try to run the various correction facilities. If an improvement is visible then I save it as you described and in Final Cut Pro, I can then see the result (after rendering)
Now I can finally see what kind of correction effect and which are not.
I have also tried corrections s.der curve described in "analyze trust". While the loop was running, I have the curve s.der place where an outlier was smoothed. After a change was visible. But since I still have to try next.
So, your friendly instructions were very helpful. Thank you.
Antwort von Randoms:
Hello Randoms,
well, then I'll follow your advice
So, your friendly instructions were very helpful. Thank you. Please, please, the beautiful art you progressed.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Hello Randoms
Thanks again.
My material is of the
SonyPWM EX3 (XDCAM Ex 1080i). Which Codec You propose - ProRes 4222? Then cut synonymous in native XDCAM EX! A Umkonvertierung in ProRes will be mostly useless, unless you work s.Movies spots. But then you'd probably synonymous another camera taken.
Learn to work with: always natively! Umkonvertieren robs quality, power, space.
