Frage von telex:
closes as the FX1 s.ein HD TV, if s.der FX1 is no HDMI?
one sees the "blur", which are supposed to be on a 37 "Full HD?
worth the purchase now one or FX1? Or is it outdated?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... worth the purchase now one or FX1? ... http://forum.slashcam.de/lohnt-sich-der-kauf-einer-hdr-fx1-noch-vt57432.html
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Axel:
closes as the FX1 s.ein HD TV, if s.der FX1 is no HDMI? About Component:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_Video
one sees the "blur", which are supposed to be on a 37 "Full HD? This question can not reply to a flat rate. Comparison of focus in what? What is it for a full HD? For the size of 37 inches just HDready all, synonymous and there are huge differences. How, for example, the (progressive working) TV camera of the future (interlace) material represent? On a computer screen - whether CRT or TFT - cause i know a blurry picture with very poor Movement Resolution (please DV material times normal view). On the quality of the deinterlacer in the TV looking at it so.
worth the purchase now one or FX1? Or is it outdated? That can turn a lump sum not say. For nearly 3000 ¬, which they probably will cost now, there are cams with more features (Canon A1), for 2000 ¬, the matter used quite differently. Who should decide this for you?
Antwort von telex:
Components is the equivalent to the HDMI input in the quality of reproduction?
Antwort von Axel:
Components is the equivalent to the HDMI input in the quality of reproduction? Apparently not. Which picture size / viewing distance which is a qualitative difference does (you must take into account both factors, on a 22 "FullHD monitor, whose screen before you stick with the nose, you can see more of course), would first be tested. It is synonymous to color (at least on the pathway to the TV) and to provide accurate playback (on a HDready Beamer dropped the overscan with HDMI away while he was on Hosiden 96% of the picture revealed (test disc). As always synonymous: Pixel counters are never happy.
Antwort von weitwinkel:
yes. HDMI delivers in general a better picture (especially on lcd tv) ...
but you want your recordings ever of the cam anschauen?
HDMI output is only meaningful if you like. on a
black magic the uncompressed signal intensity record
wants (v1/fx7 ).....
and to adjust as a preview monitor, the source components are sufficient.
gruß cj
Antwort von mammut:
Also relating to blur:
I have the same times with my FX1 s.meinem 32 "HD-Ready Television tried everything and it was super sharp. I assume that when a 37" nichz behaves differently ...
The purchase of the FX1 is worthwhile in any case, you see the times winner of the Camgaroo Film Awards 2007 in the category of HDV Görne to Klaus.
www.Camgaroo.tv
Gruss
Susanne
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
It currently costs 2.600 ¬,
if you access them, then quickly made it no longer.
You get this:
- A solid camera, the one almost never reads anything, if it goes to processing defects;
- The best display to date in its class;
- Probably the best in their class Anglein Wide (unfortunately at the expense of max. Zoom);
- A sophisticated user interface with reasonable controls;
- A balanced picture without Kantengrieseln clean.
I know it's three years ago have come to market.
Na and? My car is 9 years old, weighs 1.7 tonnes, has an automatic gearbox and consumes less than a 2005 car. Time makes a lot of things are not better, as synonymous when hundreds of Teutsche Ingenörs tuned rumwerkeln.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Axel:
Also relating to blur:
I have the same times with my FX1 s.meinem 32 "HD-Ready Television tried everything and it was super sharp. I assume that when a 37" nichz behaves differently ... ... synonymous and not on the 800 "screen, which we recorded some years ago and is still projected project. At a reasonable viewing distance is not a problem. What is the concern, not a sharp picture to get? I'm afraid the people are in love the screen saver "Aquarium" as it is in the media markets.
A too sharp picture is not beautiful (except "Aquarium").
Check out "Flying Daggers" at. Watch movies that make you appear very sharp. What percentage of the screen are sharp? Pressing "Pause", you see, then, this question is answered for you.
Antwort von katikula:
Also relating to blur:
I have the same times with my FX1 s.meinem 32 "HD-Ready Television tried everything and it was super sharp. I assume that when a 37" nichz behaves differently ...
The purchase of the FX1 is worthwhile in any case, you see the times winner of the Camgaroo Film Awards 2007 in the category of HDV Görne to Klaus.
www.Camgaroo.tv
Gruss
Susanne Susanne same thoughts, my FX1, I'll give her no more.
EVERY man can with good camera as synonymous bad film, "learn by doing" is announced!
Antwort von telex:
So the quality of the presentation on this page is anything other than HD ..?
Also relating to blur:
I have the same times with my FX1 s.meinem 32 "HD-Ready Television tried everything and it was super sharp. I assume that when a 37" nichz behaves differently ...
The purchase of the FX1 is worthwhile in any case, you see the times winner of the Camgaroo Film Awards 2007 in the category of HDV Görne to Klaus.
www.Camgaroo.tv
Gruss
Susanne
Antwort von telex:
and the FX7 would you not work?
Also relating to blur:
I have the same times with my FX1 s.meinem 32 "HD-Ready Television tried everything and it was super sharp. I assume that when a 37" nichz behaves differently ...
The purchase of the FX1 is worthwhile in any case, you see the times winner of the Camgaroo Film Awards 2007 in the category of HDV Görne to Klaus.
www.Camgaroo.tv
Gruss
Susanne
Susanne same thoughts, my FX1, I'll give her no more.
EVERY man can with good camera as synonymous bad film, "learn by doing" is announced!
Antwort von wolfgang:
yes. HDMI delivers in general a better picture (especially on lcd tv) ...
Basically stimmts - a digital transmission should be better than an analog. In practice there but synonymous quality analog transmissions where you do not have to see little difference. The main components of the FX1 heard as well as the Komponentenaugang a Canopus NX.
And yes, the FX1 is quite a good device - the line resolution of the FX1 but now it's lower than of other products. Only it's sharpness synonymous only one criterion. So I am with my FX1 so far quite pleased.
Antwort von mammut:
Hi telex,
I've synonymous to the successor of the FX1 waited and was disappointed plenty of the FX7.
I liked the design of the cam did not, the display of the FX1 is, for example, be much better (I still ask myself, why the change).
Sure you did because the HDMI connection but the XLR has not synonymous.
I know personally of anyone of the FX1 to the FX7 has changed.
If I had to choose one of the cams to get a gift, I would want the FX1. Read the instructions and you hang in, then you will of the Cam thrilled. (Even rhymes :-))
Gruss
Susanne
Antwort von Axel:
So the quality of the presentation on this page is anything other than HD ..?
Also relating to blur:
www.Camgaroo.tv
When you have it with a so-called HD-hack to do, the counterpart to the now almost extinct HiFi Heini. No, the films are not in HD, but the initially higher Resolutionteilt still with the image quality. Your internet connection could be in their original size and do not stream data, is probably synonymous your display resolution is not sufficient.
Aside from this
symphony, which has since won, a typical example of still life fell into sharp HD Heini screensavers, respectively. Calendar motives slideshows. This is the Canon HV20 better suited because it has undeniably improved Resolutionund makes full.
and the FX7 would you not work?
Whatever you choose, you will not be satisfied. This is shown by your previous postings.
Antwort von mammut:
So the quality of the presentation on this page is anything other than HD ..?
Also relating to blur:
www.Camgaroo.tv
When you have it with a so-called HD-hack to do, the counterpart to the now almost extinct HiFi Heini. No, the films are not in HD, but the initially higher Resolutionteilt still with the image quality. Your internet connection could be in their original size and do not stream data, is probably synonymous your display resolution is not sufficient.
Aside from this symphony, which has since won, a typical example of still life fell into sharp HD Heini screensavers, respectively. Calendar motives slideshows. This is the Canon HV20 better suited because it has undeniably improved Resolutionund makes full.
and the FX7 would you not work?
Whatever you choose, you will not be satisfied. This is shown by your previous postings. Of course it's not full HD quality, but an impression of the full Resolutionerhält you know ... ich finds FX1 "promotional video" beautiful :-)
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Susanne same thoughts, my FX1, I'll give her no more.
The FX1 is next to the "catastrophic blur" synonymous said that, in low light Picture no longer be reasonable to acquire.
See example ... png m2t directly from the stream ... Shutter 1 / 25, Aperture 1.7 and gain = 0dB.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von mammut:
Yes Andrew, we love our babies :-)
Antwort von telex:
lol, what it all there ...
that my HD Internetgeschw. can not display is clear to me with 11 Mbit. If yes may be synonymous, that the films had been stored ....
When you have it with a so-called HD-hack to do, the counterpart to the now almost extinct HiFi Heini. No, the films are not in HD, but the initially higher Resolutionteilt still with the image quality. Your internet connection could be in their original size and do not stream data, is probably synonymous your display resolution is not sufficient.
Aside from this symphony, which has since won, a typical example of still life fell into sharp HD Heini screensavers, respectively. Calendar motives slideshows. This is the Canon HV20 better suited because it has undeniably improved Resolutionund makes full.
Whatever you choose, you will not be satisfied. This is shown by your previous postings.
Antwort von Axel:
lol, what it all there ...
that my HD Internetgeschw. can not display is clear to me with 11 Mbit. If yes may be synonymous, that the films had been stored .... In full-size movies in HDV example you can view here
http://www.fxsupport.de/
runterladen. The FX1 is, and the other suspects as well.
It was not my intention to attack you personally. I do always the only people suffering, thousands in the sand set, and yet constantly pixels get in the eye. Who anxiously staring at the sharpness, it will never be satisfied. One sees again and again.
FX1: Work horse, robust and reliable. A bit of a classic (the HDV prototype), but I think the low value of loss over several years rather speaks for them.
Antwort von telex:
yes but on the Page are many FX1 and FX7 download synonymous dead and the most downloads Images .... In any case, yesterday.
Antwort von Axel:
yes but on the Page are many FX1 and FX7 download synonymous dead and the most downloads Images .... In any case, yesterday. That I thought initially synonymous. It goes like this: Make a
right click on the video as files on this page: SonyFX7 against Canon XH A1 - Page 001, then
download linked file - or whatever your operating system in the states.
Antwort von telex:
yes, videos probably go again but images?
http://www.fxsupport.de/01SonyHDR-UX1_06fx1.jpg
with the context menu, I had obviously synonymous probiert ...
Antwort von Markus:
Shutter 1 / 25, Aperture 1.7 and gain = 0dB. Polfilter. Motive: Bridge Rendsburg, Nord-Ostsee-Kanal, 10 February 2008 shortly after sunset. View towards east. In the west the sun was already gone, but the sky still red / orange dye. What makes the polarizer s.Camcorderobjektiv the night?
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
I had him during the day draufgehabt. After the sun slowly disappeared (and we almost deep red evening sky caught, even better than in the attached Picture!), We wanted to pack up everything and disappear (who knows the location: we stood in the parking lot north of the channel). How then shall verquatscht ... then gave my son with the VX-1000 again on the ferry (recordings are much brighter, I think we gain had not turned off).
I then in any case simply Polfilter forget :-) harmed in any case it has not ...
BG, Andreas
