Frage von Muehlt04:
Will with Magix Video Deluxe 2006 about creating a video with 150 minutes and
a DVD (do not double layer) with a reasonable quality.
When I film with Magig would like I would have to burn down with less than 4000 bit rate, and the quality would suffer much under it.
Would not that be better if I could save the entire movie as an AVI and encode encoder with the Cinema?
Do we get better quality with the cinema go?
or how would you do that?
So, wants to make any 2 DVD
Habs with a double layer tries but as always breaks somewhere s.beim play?
So that got to grips with the double layer or not!
If I were to make the movie in Xvid or so? does it work then? Quality is very good I heard.
Can this be synonymous to synonymous or DVD burning everywhere read on any drive?
Gruß Torsten
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
Problems often lie with Double Layer s.unausgereifter drive firmware (aktuallisieren) and / or faster burning speed (reduce) and / or the use of blanks that were not recommended by the drive manufacturer for the drive (nachschaun which are recommended to be found in the support area on the Manufacturer -HP) Plus, the Magix online support is available for all video deluxe Programs in the patch area under Downloads-> Utilities-called "burning routines 2006" burn-in problems which can also be helpful in general, may harm in any case not Easy to install.
- All this time check, not a little, beautiful new high-tech world ...
Nevertheless, if not synonymous, the use of the DVD player rather cheap Chinese junk is generally self-burned and double layer DVD's just not mag.Eigentlich player should take it because it is indeed burn quite a large part of the purchased DVD's is synonymous two-layered dual-layer already fairly s. technical limit and the interaction of all components, then simply critical, especially along with any external 60-Euro-China players, it ends in a fiasco.
Under certain circumstances, the effort was a perfect double layer DVD to burn it for nothing if it fails s.Abspielgerät, beautiful new high-tech world ...
150 minutes on a single-layer DVD-quality schwer.Mit for MPEG2 MPEG4 variants such as DivX or xVid is surely better that already needs to be synonymous only of the DVD player compatible with DivX or xVid to be synonymous, and also in the right Version.Abwärtskompatibel (goes zb DivX5 movie on DivX5.5-Player), but conversely nicht.Einige DivX / xVid-enabled PLayer can therefore are updated via firmware update they still synonymous upcoming DivX / Xvid can play versions that you should look out for when you do you why so want to buy a player - but I did not, however, would rather stay in a normal DVD and make dear that just because a 2 DVDs DivX / xVid you can hardly even play with a friend, the devices are simply too rare.
Antwort von Muehlt04:
Thus
First of thanks for your great vielden Report
So have to go Check the firmware, etc.
But probably I will do then get 2 DVD, which do not cost so much.
Had it done it that way, so that about 1.5 hours on a DVD is still ok.
Thanks again
Gruß Torsten
Antwort von DjDino (Toth Dominik):
Had it done it that way, so that about 1.5 hours on a DVD is still ok. Is so synonymous with me, 1:30. Among them are me in a lot of movement artifacts.
Antwort von Markus:
For others, see this response as synonymous:
110 minutes onto a DVD in best quality?
