Frage von luftikus143:
Hello,
The last day for hours after I google-usSeiten had rolled, I'm not so sure whether I'm even more confused than before ... :-) And as I have to read several entries here with the impression that there are cracks s.Werke the right ...
I have the experience with my Canon MV600 to me because of the poor image quality indoors, and the loud noise tapes really do not like before, I create what "better".
The following criteria are important to me:
1) Do With Apple / iMovie work. (So probably already time limit on MiniDV.)
Have 2) Good quality in poor lighting. (Light intensity 1.2?)
3) Shall have a lamp / light.
4) If possible connection for external micro.
5) Photo function is completely unimportant.
Had one or the other camera in the eye, but then much to me that any of these conditions was not met. It seems to me that more or less only Sony, Canon and Panasonic are available. Synonymous but there's still plenty of models, presumably, none of which satisfied all the conditions, right?
Thank you very much if someone here could bring light into darkness, and one, two or three recommendations were to maybe 800 euro on hand ...
Antwort von Jan:
Hello luftikus143,
1) "rockers" had had contact with a SonyDVD synonymous, but mini DV is better
2) one or the other JVC had / has intensity 1.2 - yet they were unable to convince LowLight excessively, because size and CCD signal processor synonymous still have a say in matters of light sleep
3) the built-in or the small clip-Led bulbs are actually hard to use, except for close-ups
4) actually have almost all in your price range - with the specificity that would have a proprietary Sony device will be used.
My favorites in the price range for you would be:
Panasonic GS 250
Canon MVX 45i
The Sony Group is designed with micro SonyHC 90,94,96 with declines in access and relatively few manual options, but a good picture, thanks to the large 1 / 3 "CCD and the Zeiss T * lens apochromatic koregierten Lens.
With less money
Panasonic GS 280 - at the moment it goes without end, and is 600 ¬ in Verkauffshit class far ahead of any Sony ......
LG
January
Antwort von stonecutter:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the help.
At Panasonic I then encountered today in the course of the evening, the GS synonymous 250th Listening to everything very well. 1.6 for the luminous intensity is already 1.8 times better than that of most other models.
One of the differences on the 150 is surely the "OIS: Optical Image Stabilization, with the 250's is an electronic. Although I have read here in the forum that is generally better than optical electronical. Somewhere I've read in a test summary that a weakness of 250 of the Image Stabilization is ... Hmmm ..
Antwort von prem:
Uppsala, those are 170 euro difference between the 250 and 280th Up to that is f1.6 or f1.8, and the 280 seems to be no DV input but I see there's not much difference ...
Antwort von Jan:
No. 250 has an optical, and it was not torn in Fachmag's views as most Panasonic's with electronic / digital.
GS 150 has, unfortunately, only electronic.
Comparison of the GS 250 vs GS 280 was only yesterday when Slashcam.
GS 250 vs GS 280 LG
January
