Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Regulation of Internet-TV plans of heidi - 21 Jul 2008 14:02:00 Currently provides excitement for a change in the Bavarian TV Statute (FSS), the p.10. July has been adopted and an authorization of "Internet TV offers" provision. According to the Bavarian für neue Medien (BLM), the private broadcasting in Bavaria supervised, is a
two-stage distinction
- From 500 to 10,000 simultaneous access options: authorization and - where there are no concerns programminhaltlich - approved without further requirements,
- Over 10,000 simultaneous access: Organizational
processes such as for a normal cable program under the conditions of § 10 para
2 and 3 FSS.
Who geographically requirement of this license will be affected, is somewhat unclear, since not defined is whether the server location or the location of the provider is crucial (although we would tap on the latter), but emphasizes the BLM that they only "existing legal practice in Germany ", and as Golem
Interessant ist die justification New Berlin, Wisconsin
/ Danke s.Detlef für den Hinweis /
Golem
Interessant ist die This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von weitwinkel:
wonders how many jobs this new regulation will cost ...
gruß cj
Antwort von Daigoro:
Why have they not synonymous history "Internet TV" have to call?
As the swinging leg Marketing violently back again.
IP-TV "has with" broadcast "in the conventional sense but nothing to do - that gives her the protocol.
"Moving on call" (BAA) or "Moving Pictures with Sound on Demand" (MPwSoD) .. Regulators would have at least 2 months more confused and at bay.
Ahh .. and if I read here, come to me to tears:
"Publishing, TV production companies, corporates, brands and organizations in pushing the program providers and create new market TV stations, with the TV in the traditional competition occur.
In the area of IP TV is GRID-TV is not only architects and pioneers of an entire generation of broadcasters, but especially the service, the best IP-TV solutions for absolutely any program provider provides. "
argh!
Antwort von Christian Schmitt:
Then probably all German IPTV projects soon in the form of the UK Ltd in are declared ...
What actually called "Internet TV offers (n)" - from the Munich MolligeUschi36 now her erotic portal LiveCam television as approved (if more than 500 users simultaneously "on" can be)?
And what does "TV" so special?
There is no permit for a "net-magazine", NEN blog or podcast (or located since I wrong)?
And is the Internet portal of a local newspaper auto an Internet TV service "if synonymous with video to offer come from?
It sounds like everything to people who need to call your secretary to mail in Outlook to open ne ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...), The Munich MolligeUschi36 from now it LiveCam Erotik Portal television as approved (if more than 500 users simultaneously "on" can be)? (...)
A great Picture. Around the behind it.
Antwort von weitwinkel:
who is actually behind this action?
for whom the rules are useful?
Who disturbs the current status?
gruß cj
Antwort von PowerMac:
People who have Public Media is not complex enough ...
Antwort von Ficeduld:
...... It sounds like everything to people who need to call your secretary to mail in Outlook to open ne ...
better, one could not say it!
Antwort von vulkanmarc:
what's behind it? a billion dollar business, that neither the sender nor the GEZ, nor the cable operator, or the state want to miss! mitverdienen so that you can, you have to control it, we young people and filmmakers and regulate and restrict the consumer fleece! it is clearly not about the control of the content, because here there should be no role to play, how much the distribution will offer streaming! poor, rich germany, I can only say!
Antwort von PowerMac:
This is polemic. Actually this is just an adaptation of the broadcasting treaty s.das 2008. Streaming of video and television on the Internet so far removed from the scope of the RStV, the more traditional means of transmission was gemünzt. To establish a TV channel was not always so easy.
Antwort von weitwinkel:
schade drum ...
the internet has as much free play but fun.
are alternatives?
it is at a i-net to stay?
gruß cj
Antwort von AndyZZ:
The GEZ is behind ... ;-)
Antwort von Daigoro:
schade drum ...
the internet has as much free play but fun.
are alternatives?
it is at a i-net to stay?
gruß cj
The Internet is in the practical implementation unreglementierbar, because it is not locally limited.
The big portals (Erode and co. Of course, synonymous), the millions are simply moving to implement. Access to it can not even with the great Chinese firewall actually prevent - just difficult.
The Depp is the small manufacturer (500 simultaneously to as' TV 'to apply, it is ridiculous - the average achieved since elementary intercom is more real and' broadcast ') and the (perhaps unexpectedly) successful Hobbyist who does not flee can.
Antwort von Detlef Sauerborn:
The state media authorities are losing more and more s.Bedeutung. While the institution of traditional broadcasters nor the award of frequencies played a role, this is the Internet is no longer the case. There are simply Internet TV at nothing to regulate. The ladies and gentlemen in the national media seem to want only their well-paid chair rescue. The lawyer specializing in media law Solmecke Christian has written a contribution: http://www.golem.de/0807/61174.html
Antwort von Christian Schmitt:
This is polemic. Actually this is just an adaptation of the broadcasting treaty s.das 2008. Streaming of video and television on the Internet so far removed from the scope of the RStV, the more traditional means of transmission was gemünzt. To establish a TV channel was not always so easy.
Starts the problem is not already in the definition of a "television" at?
On the net there are relatively few but eh (linerare) offers live streaming of the formal and technical characteristics of existing television channels correspond.
It is often Streaming On-Demand.
It is not synonymous Broadcasting. If RTL suddenly NPD only broadcast commercials, could be the influence of public opinion.
The unintentionally funny "news" of the NPD in the WWW, however, go more or less in a phenomenal job in the network.
There is no need synonymous more, the limited spectrum available to regulate.
Even if I state television Wahrug to a (supposed) objectivity in reporting tremendous importance, I find this approach of state interference in the media diversity simply ridiculous, because desperate ...
