Frage von evildead79:
Hello!
I am an organizer had instructed his Festival (various bands) to film. The oral. agreed fee, I have not received the money because he did not had. To my cost of production to get back out, I then after a few weeks s.die record companies directly for the purpose of paragraph on that issue.
Question: we need a release of the recording material from the organizer?
The organizer says, because his festival for the second time took place ... car was protected not only the name but everything around synonymous.
I do not want the name of the event ... to use on stage, however, is a banner of the event to see ... is the only accessory?
Hope you can maybe help me and possibly synonymous to refer relevant legal text. Thank you very much!
MfG
evildead79
Antwort von Login_vergessen:
The organizer can do for the 10th festival synonymous hold times, auto is there nothing at all times protected.
The copyright s.den pictures you have, and nobody else. The exploitation rights against you can money remained after sell. However, since the bands synonymous copyright for their works,
you need to turn your video footage of "exploitation rights". So I would just like a visceral say.
As between you and the organizers obviously no verifiable agreement (which will not happen again should), he's supposed "rights" so sue first. And where it does not even have money for you?
Google time for "copyright", "KUG" and "exploitation rights".
Antwort von evildead79:
Yeah, so I see the synonymous ...
In my case, the bands / record companies, rights holders s.der Music and fortunately s.dem material interest. ;-)
I had the event a written offer, which he had not responded. We then had the job done.
Two days before the festival, he called s.and then suggested that he stop so much stress and would be confirmed s.Telefon the offer ... and I was so stupid it raised.
Regards
Antwort von stepi1974:
s.Telefon then confirmed the offer ... and I was so stupid it raised. That is not stupid. Even an oral contract is valid. The annoying for you it's only the evidence.
But if you have a written offer rausgeschickt searched and implied by your action (= recording of the events) have fulfilled the contract, it looks better already!
Finally, he do not just held by the rotation, but approved, so to speak, that you're working for him.
Therefore, you can ask to have your offer in accordance with the Treaty = paid.
So far the theory. Unfortunately, now a lawyer ran ...
Antwort von stepi1974:
Finally, he do not just held by the rotation, but approved, so to speak, that you're working for him.
Therefore, you can ask to have your offer in accordance with the Treaty = paid. Ich lach mich weg ... standstill by the organizer includes a contract? Tolerated by a rotary is a contract?
So far the theory. Unfortunately, now a lawyer ran ... Before long it was but someone actively ????????
Antwort von pingu2k:
I am an organizer had instructed his Festival (various bands) to film. The oral. Agreed fee, I have not received Order -> fees.
Now put yourself back to sleep.
Antwort von pingu2k:
If I agreed fee sue, but I must be synonymous to the mission ... a DVD produced by the festival. At a joint product with the organization, however, I am no longer interested ... is already the business.
Most bands at this festival are played at the same record company. There is now a very good contact (other orders ... orders paid !)... here was never invited by the organizers as to whether these bands can be filmed and whether a release for a publication later on done.
In Section 31 Copyright Act (UrhG) is that the client acquires a right to use auto (He instructs us as a company for the purpose of DVD production -> this works, he wants to use) and in § 41 UrhG is that I have the client only after two years this right can escape. After two years, the recording material may have no value?
My personal. Conclusion:
I see here from the organizers do not wish to use the material ... he paid us in front of not only (which already represents possibly a fraud) and synonymous cares not about the release of the record company. Because the material we have now, however, can sell, he has latched to a piece of cake to deduct mature. Because I want to stop n!
I would like the whole thing without Fachanwalt solve, because this is not cheap and I just cost at least until the procedure starting to bear.
Antwort von pingu2k:
Attorneys Fees paid are inserted after and not after they see fit, because I würd so ask first.
