Frage von bernd_das_brot:
Hello people!
Today I heard a colleague of the SSD of a hard drive in his MacBook Pro gushed. It was again the subject of DV editing, because there are the export times ever so slowly. Now the question is whether you have experience of jmd has?
Maybe can jmd a tip for me where I in the network get an SSD hard drive for my MacBook ...? The Apple version is probably about 1,300 ¬ for 512 GB, which is too expensive :-(;
Antwort von Gore:
OT: I'm annoyed every time over Apple when I see outrageous their Prices! And if I still hear talk about a friend who works at Apple and it indicates that 80 billion U.S. dollars of Apple will pay for anything from petty cash, I'm really angry!
Sorry, was offtopic ...
Antwort von Piers:
Hello people!
Today I heard a colleague of the SSD of a hard drive in his MacBook Pro gushed. It was again the subject of DV editing, because there are the export times ever so slowly. Now the question is whether you have experience of jmd has? Experience, but the export is playing but the speed of the HDD no role. Since it is more about CPU power.
Antwort von Mink:
512GB SSD for 1300 ¬ ( ¬ 1,250 by the way) ... that's not an Apple-price .... as much costs as much SSD storage including built just at the moment ....
For 128GB SSD, Apple wants ¬ 250 ...
EDIT: The Apple still builds 5.400er plates in their Macbooks is there already seems like a nerve ..... because that is n neck .....
Antwort von PowerMac:
OT: I'm annoyed every time over Apple when I see outrageous their Prices! And if I still hear talk about a friend who works at Apple and it indicates that 80 billion U.S. dollars of Apple will pay for anything from petty cash, I'm really angry!
Sorry, was offtopic ... Do not talk nonsense. 80 billion dollars ... ridiculously wrong.
Antwort von masterseb:
I can confirm from personal experience that SSDs bring the MBP insane speed increase! right down the line. only for very large files, the performance goes down. but not under 7200rpm hard drive
Antwort von PowerMac:
Have a 120 GB SSD Intel in 15s. At first very quickly. Slowly it is: slow.
Antwort von deti:
Have a 120 GB SSD Intel in 15s. At first very quickly. Slowly it is: slow. ... and what are today already 120GB - as fits on it so just the bare essentials. As long as the offer SSDs do not> 500GB for <200 ¬, they simply do not make fun.
Deti
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Have a 120 GB SSD Intel in 15s. At first very quickly. Slowly it is: slow. Without the TRIM command of the OS, it is unfortunately the loss of power for SSDs.
http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/meldung/Hinweise-auf-TRIM-Unterstuetzung-bei-neuen-MacBook-Pro-Modellen-1202978.html
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Have a 120 GB SSD Intel in 15s. At first very quickly. Slowly it is: slow.
... and what are today already 120GB - as fits on it so just the bare essentials. As long as the offer SSDs do not> 500GB for <200 ¬, they simply do not make fun.
Deti 60GB enough for a system drive very good, if not a variety of applications is installed.
On a 120GB OCZ Agility2 I have in addition to the OS and the applications have enough room for my mid-video projects (over 20GB of raw materials). On a notebook, but the place is usually not sufficient for a second HDD / SSD. Therefore, it should be at least as early 120GB.
Antwort von deti:
60GB enough for a system drive very good, if not a variety of applications is installed. But we are talking here of a MacBook - so a notebook and as you would like noexterne plate lug around with, or (even if the system disk, 120GB, you get almost nothing on it)?
Deti
Antwort von RickyMartini:
SSDs are faster and cheaper. However, not all SSDs for notebooks are suitable for energy-saving features, which may reduce their lifespan considerably. SSDs of Models with Intel and Marvell controller (C300 & Co) to be suitable for the mobile sector very well.
The new generation of Crucial (RealSSD C400) should be ideally suited primarily for "Sandy Bridge" Calculator - because of the very high data rates.
Intel even used synonymous current Marvell controller in the 510er Series:
http://geizhals.at/deutschland/?cat=hdssd&xf=1195_Marvell+88SS9174&sort=r
Antwort von deti:
SSDs are faster and cheaper. They need not necessarily faster, but it must be much larger. For "cheaper" we agree.
Anyone who says of his SSD in your laptop, the thing has to stop talking nice, but a practical use it has not. It requires less energy not synonymous, as is claimed so often. Of course there are applications for SSDs in notebooks, but which lie rather in the aspect of mechanical resistance.
Deti
