Frage von DSLR-Freak:
I could now be witnessing the performance of a new Sandy Bridge notebooks.
Key data for the notebook configuration:
XMG A501 ADVANCED Gaming Notebook 39.6 cm (15.6 ")
. NVIDIA GeForce 1024 GT 540M GDDR3
. Intel Core i7 2720QM
. HD + (1600 * 900) Non-Glare
. 8GB RAM
. 256GB SSD Crucial RealSSD
. Optimus and relatively low
. price 1.680, -
The performance is amazing!
In Premiere CS5 was 5 (!) DSLR Canon AVCHD clips are played at the same time native smooth. The performance of the GPU could be guided by Effects hardly s.die boundaries and really satisfies all requirements.
The hammer is the SSD: 355MB / s (read) are connected via SATA 6! Complex projects are actually loaded in seconds - no one needs there a RAID or a second hard drive - archiving via eSATA.
And all with Optimus technology!
The benchmark for Premiere Pro CS5 http://ppbm5.com was at a value of 380 Total Time (sec.) tops and so loose a variety overclocked high-end workstations with scary configuration. One must note here that this benchmark list of most systems is suggested that the prices are beyond rational limits and noise at most for Tüfftler & tuners are good, but not for those who wish to deal better with the video art. All statements on the need of RAID systems, etc. on this site are my opinion now much less valid.
The joke is: The new Intel Quick Sync technology here is not even mentioned. What will happen if Adobe supported in here? We may then talk over 10-15 tracks AVCHD without significant CPU load - on a notebook!
The combination of these technologies is really a quantum leap!
Antwort von pailes:
In Premiere CS5 was 5 (!) DSLR Canon AVCHD clips are played at the same time native smooth. For your information: The Canon DSLRs do not AVCHD. It is H.264 in Quicktime container with a high bit rate encoder and inefficient. This has relevance to your test so far, because efficient AVC-encoded material produced significantly more weight than the stuff out of the tumble in the Canon DSLRs.
I doubt not that the Sandy Bridge is a good editing system.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
The Canon DSLRs do not AVCHD. It is H.264 in Quicktime container with a high bit rate encoder and inefficient. In the "language", the terms AVCHD and H.264 are so frequently and erroneously used interchangeably. Your comment is fully right!
The excellent value of the Premiere Pro Benchmark remains unaffected.
Antwort von dustdancer:
In the "language", the terms AVCHD and H.264 are so frequently and erroneously used interchangeably. Your comment is fully right! which is full of future rubbish. You may be using the two begriflichkeiten wrong, that does not mean still that it is universal;).
Now to your test. I must say that is not really the premiere crucial instance for me.
more interesting is how schläg the sandy brigde at ae, c4d, 3DSM, etc. are the proggis who need computing power, in my opinion. I mean with my old cs5 creates q6600 clocked at standart synonymous clips without h.264 sample 3 from the 7d. everything I've tried net, not because there was a necessity.
and once you with ae, c4d, 3DSM, etc work, you'll know you appreciate usefulness of raids again. and it was an ssd raid.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
This post is meant readers insight into the performance of the new Sandy Bridge type systems - in particular with regard to notebooks. I can now tell for a long time on this subject and would apply to such information, in fact, have been grateful. prevent the main reason why, for the purchase of a completely overpriced and inefficient Macbook Pro. This can not of course affect all readers alike.
@ Dustdancer: Some of your comments I find it good because they deepen the next. Some things I find destructive. I would like to comment on the following:
In the "language", the terms AVCHD and H.264 are so frequently and erroneously used interchangeably. Your comment is fully right! which is full of future rubbish. You may be using the two begriflichkeiten wrong, that does not mean still that it is universal;). I spoke of "language often incorrectly. This was with "universality" doing too little.
more interesting is how schläg the sandy brigde at ae, c4d, 3DSM, etc. are the proggis who need computing power, in my opinion. Very true! Computing power, especially in After Effects: The more the better. In point of processing power, the Sandy Bridge i7 2720QM points firm, because the CPU performance depends significantly from all mobile quads. Likewise, your desktop quad by a whopping 130%! We are moving on the level of a desktop Intel Core i7 975@3.33GHz. As I said Quick Sync not even mentioned!
See, for example http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
Also at the AE RAM plays a significant role and can be designed to quiet larger than 8 GB.
and once you with ae, c4d, 3DSM, etc work, you'll know you appreciate usefulness of raids again. and it was an ssd raid. That here the 256GB SSD Crucial RealSSD the performance bottleneck is, in my opinion to somewhat unrealistic. Also: As for hard disks, a RAID-look that surpasses the performance of this SSD? Since we are talking about regarding the reading rate of at least three fast drives in RAID 0 .. oh oh. Crash data have fun. And regarding. access times, we speak well of a few dozen fast hard disks in RAID ... ;-)
The bottleneck is more the CPU power and RAM.
You can contact me but would dispel this notion. I suspect, you have not had the pleasure of this SSD SATA 6 s.einem be able to test.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
I am very glad that you've decided on a notebook based on Sandy Bridge and so are quite happy! :)
A current SSD brings to the project load times, really a huge time advantage.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
I am very glad that you've decided on a notebook based on Sandy Bridge and so are quite happy! :) Your tip was really worth gold! Thanks again!
Antwort von dustdancer:
@ Freak:
I had you read what I wrote, you'd know that I raid, and it wrote a raid with SSDs. read at tomshardware / hardwarelux / computer base can, which is quite reasonable to conclude SSDs to raid together, as it gives an enormous performance gain.
of the loose sandy put my 6 year old cpu in the bag is clear. the sandy brings but unfortunately synonymous with the cons, for example, less ram than the old base.
with the statement:
in language use, you put it there as it would be normal with my avchd to h.264. sorry, you're the first person I "know", the H.264 and AVCHD throws in a ton. and you put it out as a generally valid because of you, "the language" writing. but let that be does nothing.
outcomes with respect to your c3d, 3DSM, s.etc I'm really curious where you did this come from? have you tested it yourself? because this can be found in the wets, unfortunately, no real data.
I am also skeptical with your statement that beats the sandy an overclocked 975 (I am referring only to 3d rendering and effect). have you got any sources that you could show me again? would be really interesting because I have found in the area yet
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
outcomes with respect to your c3d, 3DSM, s.etc I'm really curious where you did this come from? have you tested it yourself? because this can be found in the wets, unfortunately, no real data.
I am also skeptical with your statement that beats the sandy an overclocked 975 (I am referring only to 3d rendering and effect). have you got any sources that you could show me again? would be really interesting because I have found in the area yet Own test data can tell you this, I unfortunately did not work, but this test specifically for After Effects ...
http://www.tomshardware.de/charts/desktop-cpu-charts-2010/ video editing Adobe After Effects CS5, 2427.html
... And the CPU benchmark, which you can then set about comparing times to evaluate the performance of mobile processors as a guide to:
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
Antwort von dustdancer:
the prob s.den tomshardware test is that they use the net really "real" projects. they do not with the effects of different test. the th test I know of synonymous, but as I said, the net convinced me;).
