Frage von Blackeagle123:
Hello,
I'm looking for a relatively cheap graphics card, the 3 monitors supported.
Requirement would only PCIe (Express). Super would be naturally more than 128Mb of RAM, since the graphics card since CS3 is involved yes s.Rendervorgang
Is it possible, two graphics cards convenient to combine (bridge), so that my desktop over 3 monitors stretch, or is the graphic calculation faster?
I already have one of Matrox Parhelia (AGP graphics card) that supports the 3 monitors. What products are available today?
I would like to max. 150 ¬ to spend. But have no idea what an appropriate and good graphics card will cost.
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
A brief explanation of why only 150 ¬ will be available: I have a second PC on which Adobe OnLocation I can run to an equalizer and multiple monitors for the assessment of the video would have been available. A good analog / digital converters would cost about 150 ¬.
The third monitor, I would probably synonymous only to display of EQ, etc. use. While many others would have more opportunities to me but not a much higher price would be worth. ;-)
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
Just a second graphics card installed in your calculator. About a Radeon 4850 or 4830th
Antwort von tommyb:
http://www.realtimesoft.com/multimon/reviews/3mon_rad9k/
Here is a three-monitor setup is described in conjunction with of ATI graphics cards.
In principle, you need two graphics cards, because a maximum of two monitors can provide. That is, if the PCI Express slot on the motherboard with a PCI-E card is busy, then you can just be a normal PCI card draw.
This means that for the PCI Express slot should have a good map as far as possible since for the normal PCI slot kanns synonymous cheaper to do so.
Example of such maps:
HIS Radeon HD 4830 512MB
Antwort von PowerMac:
Why only one PCI-E slot? I have three free PCI-E 2.0 slots. A 16-lane slot is occupied with a 4870. Stay three remaining free.
Antwort von tommyb:
If the thread Create a motherboard with at least two 16er PCI-E slots, at home, then definitely.
It could, furthermore synonymous a PCI graphics card of Ebay shoot for 1, - (and more, they are not worth it) and that would be ruthlessly effective in comparison to another PCI-E card.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
my mainboard PCIe Specifications:
2x PCI-E v2.0 x16, 2PCI-E x16, 1x PCI-E
The setup I have now read in detail by times. Is it even possible to 4 monitors adapter? That would be with a 30 ¬-of ATI graphics card already, which are always cheaper!
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von tommyb:
You can synonymous exploit your whole slots per graphics card and two?. Theoretically.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Then 6x42''TVs and mounts to the next and hang over each other. Or I hang myself at 6 Beamer, of course, an enormous light intensity have.
Apart of the price I would think I annoy ;-)
With 4 monitors (2 for timeline & section, 1 for a full preview and 1 as a reference monitor with luminance, etc.) are already practically.
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
Nothing special.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2855308255_538b26fd94.jpg
Antwort von Fenek:
Very nice with the Pivot monitors!
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Can we ask whether a breastfeeding image of you is?
Many greetings!
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
What are the current graphics card is because with a Radeon 9800 pro comparable? I'm just around the graphics performance. I would also like to have 256Mb RAM.
Unfortunately, I can with all the names no longer start and do not know what is sufficient.
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
For the second time: Radeon 4850 or 4830 to buy.
Antwort von RickyMartini:
I would also like to have 256Mb RAM.
The graphics memory with memory Demner purely garnicht to do!
The individual memory cards can not be done.
Gib mal bitte but data on your calculator.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
I've synonymous of graphics RAM from main memory and not spoken. I know that the very words were misunderstood. ;-)
my system:
AMD Phenom 9850 + (AM2 + with 4x 2500Mhz)
Mainboard MSI K9A2 Platinum
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Pro
4GB RAM
2x 500GB in Raid 0 composite (current archive - Only finished projects)
1x 360Gb (Windows, Programs, My Documents)
1x 360Gb (Projects)
All SATA2 harddisks
3x DVD Burners (+/-), Double Layer, (one of which is external with LightScribe)
Runs on Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit version.
Please make sure that I am video editing and post production including complex 3d (C4D) would like to edit. (Now synonymous HD material). Nevertheless, I would
not extremely expensive graphics card to buy that one for 3d games brauch, Probe 2 graphics cards, ATI Radeon preferred.
Do I need this really such a good graphics card like the Radeon 4850 (combined with a slower)? Or would synonymous two HD 4350 (each 512Mb - which does not add up) range?
When I have understood everything correctly, I could be determined even on the HDMI output of the graphics card a HD Television? and that as the HD preview monitor in Premiere Pro CS4 to use! Or?
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) Including extensive post-production 3d (C4D) would like to edit. (Now synonymous HD material). (...) Do I need this really such a good graphics card like the Radeon 4850 (combined with a slower)? Or would synonymous two HD 4350 (each 512Mb - which does not add up) range? (...) Extensive post-production = Minimum Radeon 4870, if necessary synonymous 4850th
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
I'm still used to the graphics card is not in the rendering process will be involved ... And thought, therefore, that today a graphics card with 512Mb of graphics memory can be sufficient. But apparently I should have a graphics card to buy, even for sophisticated computer games would be suitable?
Should I just buy a Radeon 4870 and a second effective, such as the above mentioned HD card?
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
Listening times to forget the graphics memory, of which you continuously start. The secondary is important. For each tail-graphics card of today has at least 512 MB, even 1 GB of graphics memory. Important is only the power of the graphics card. I do not know what programs you use today, and I know not synonymous, what programs you have in the near or distant future will be. But the future lies with the GPUs. With new standards is the way for calculations on the effect of graphics card. Therefore, a fast graphics card, one synonymous with the 3D games fast enough. The 4850 and 4870 are, with the 4870 is clearly faster. Purchase two for my 4850th That will suffice. But no second SLOW.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Thank you! =)
Thus both the GPUs graphics cards used for rendering in CS4? (; Especially AfterFX Premiere)
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
What is more likely to recommend?
NVidia GeForce or Radeon?
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von Commanderjanke:
In spite of the increased Werbetamtam with Nvidia Radeon cards are generally a little advantage at Adobe but honestly the differences are marginal.
I am using Nvidia, but would leave because of the price ratio line Radeon recommend it!
Antwort von Jörg:
Radeon cards are generally a little advantage at Adobe but honestly can you explain the statement in some way, what are the benefits?
Antwort von Commanderjanke:
When I looked at CS3 and I have risen through the system requirements page of Adobe.com've beaten sometime, I came to internal benchmarks on which different systems and their encodierzeit with none, few and many effects have been tested.
There were the Radeon systemservice always a little bit in front, with the same remaining hardware.
Hab now but honestly do not want to look after! ;-)
Antwort von PowerMac:
Under OS X Radeon cards are faster so far in the Core Image performance, that is, in Motion, Color and Aperture.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
okay, then I am glad that I have a Radeon graphics card to order. I'm namely synonymous with the drivers much better clear. If I were with my old NVidia graphics card a second monitor (; Deksotp extended) wanted to connect, it was in any case always associated with more work than with Radeon ... And when it comes to setting up of monitors goes 3-4, I had a good feeling with Radeon.
If the rendering performance is also better, it is probably the Radeon HD 4870 with 512Mb are. 1024MB graphics memory are too expensive and I do not believe it at 4GB of RAM (; will probably 8 Gb RAM) and AMD Phenom X2 a big difference in the rendering time will be.
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
the first ATI Radeon 4870 I bought. The PC is running but not yet, so I little on the performance of the PC can say. A second card but for the third monitor will follow! (If I had 150 ¬ ...)
Otherwise, pretty much everything that a computer must have cut. (Of course, together with external hardware & CNAC)
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Now I have yet again a question:
You can graphics cards these are "bridged". Is that always zweingend necessary if man 2 graphics cards to use and what is the advantage of it? Can I be synonymous up to 4 monitors (at 2 GraKas) operate, or are then 2 GraKas than 1 recognized?
Must also always 2 identical graphics cards are connected? Or I could synonymous another graphics card installed?
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von tommyb:
So if you think so Crossfire, there's info here about this:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATI_Crossfire
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
Thank you for that! If I have understood correctly, then with two graphics cards is expected (this faster rendering process - I believe - the CS3) and I can have more than 2 monitors
simultaneously? Right?
Only now the question remains whether two identical cards or any cards on Crossfire may be linked?
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
Yes, that's true. But whether Crossfire Effect of calculation and compositing (soon via CUDA) is relevant, I do not know. On the Mac is not Crossfire.
