Frage von Benutzername:
Hello, I plan to switch completely to the radio because I no longer with 40m multi-core work and would like me to stop everything easier.
I use a MKH416 s.der fishing basket with wind and all, also I use for a Atmoaufnahmen Rode NT5 stereo pair.
Now I question you, if I s.alle Mikros a SKP100 G2 unpack, and the signal with an EM100 G2 receive (ie, for each microphone a transmitter and a receiver), I then compared to the loss of quality cable?
I have extra sennheiser plucked too, is a SKP100 enough already for lossless transmission, or there must be a ¬ 1000 SKP3000 be? The next distance will never be as 30-40 meters. So it would be very annoying when on a MKH416 the quality is lost.
Antwort von Pianist:
Hello, I plan to switch completely to the radio because I no longer with 40m multi-core work and would like me to stop everything easier. You betray us first, what recording situations it is? Why 40 meters? Of course, wireless technology can be useful, but it is precisely the series of cheap Sennheiser makes the sound is not better. You can get synonymous disorders einhandeln available to you did not symmetrical lines. There are other sources of error wireline away. Which mixer do you want because the signals from the receiver together? Denke dran synonymous that you are always with other wireless users and you agree to battery or batteries have to worry about.
In my view, wireless technology should be used only when no wired solution is possible. So, for example as a hand microphone in moderation or in connection with inconspicuous and pocket transmitters. If a man with MKH 416 fishes, I would because no transmitter ranmachen, but a cable. Only then my spontaneous thoughts about this.
Matthias
Antwort von Benutzername:
Hello,
it is so that I so want to shoot short films.
And then I always have a corner with control technology monitors and now I want to hold a rack about it also with mixer (Behringer RX1202) and a Fostex CR500 recorder, and the recipients, etc.
40 meters, it is only in extreme cases, as I complete the tech corner Nick umräumen will not often I wanted to switch to the radio (only sound ;-)
Antwort von Benutzername:
Edit:
Mattias, you've convinced me!
I am now a small rack of tinkering, with the above mixer and then a Marantzrekorder (PMD660) I either equal to the Tonmann hanging around his neck in "mobile" scenes, or I will hang him s.den mixers at my rack. Also I get then 2 NTG5 of Rode, the synonymous cable s.den mixers come. Now I can only either directly to the sound of the recording angel or I'll hang all mics (Angel + by Atmo NTG5 Set) ans mixer and then draw on the Marantrekorder on.
But there are holes for Rackblenden with XLR connectors and the appropriate mounting XLR connectors, but how do these times of the rear? How do I connect it with the recorder?
I really missing something s.Tonausstattung? The rack is so much smaller, a little more money would be synonymous on but what I need for my needs yet?
Antwort von Benutzername:
2Edit:
I feel like I fitted with jacks connect the mixer, not with the recorder ...
Antwort von Pianist:
I leave you now just continue to write about night and then sign me tomorrow if you finish everything out, you will surely be as much ... :-)
Matthias
Antwort von klaus-jürgen:
Hello,
I am interested synonymous burning, how to XLReinbaubuchsen connects with a blender, the bushes around synonymous rear XLR connector, so that you just jack and mixer with a standard XLRkabel can connect?
Antwort von robbie:
No, most have no rear jacks. But you can solder on a cable behind the so-50cm long, and s.das other end of the cable the desired times, then into the mixer is.
Whether times are synonymous, where both sides are jacks, I do not know because I've never used ... s.besten it looks at times Thomann after .. www.thomann.de
Antwort von Bilingual:
Hello, Matthias
am with my purchases, unfortunately, has not yet come next, as I am today a beautiful day spent on Sylt, tomorrow I will probably synonymous little time, but I still s.Ball and will weitre post questions.
1. What mounting XLR jacks, on the back synonymous connected, where you do not need to solder?
2. If I need to solder which cable should I use?
Should I get a 50cm cable-ready to buy and remove them to an end?
Or should I use a simple XLR plug for the mixer and a mounting socket for the Aperture and buy them with XLR cable (meter goods without Thomann of times) solder together?
3. If you think the cheapest version (SKP100) of the Sennheiser sachen no good, what is it with the middle (SKP500) from? or about the upper class (SKP3000)?
4. Is there a rule on what you should pay particular attention, ie whether the sender or receiver should be high quality? If a recipient SKP300 s.den approve of Sennheiser what?
Antwort von Pianist:
Do you know - I have your postings with a very significant problem. You seem have very little experience to have, but supposedly know exactly what you want to do everything. Only you do not know how you want to make it. It brings nothing but if I'm going to now give any tips and tell you that only the 3000 series diversity receiver with the necessary operational security brings the other hand if you something of a Behringer mixer telling. You scheust you already before soldering of XLR-mounting socket. So I really do not know how I can help you.
Matthias
