Frage von Blackeagle123:
Hello,
I want to make a Time Lapse Recording of the sunset. In the end, the lights are always addressing.
Rumprobiert have much, but now I'm interested in how you would set the camera so that the sun is not overexposed, one night (not because of slow shutter speed) as date, etc. look like?
Do you completely manual, it might work without the night is too dark? Or should I leave the DSLR to "Automatic" and using a gradient-ND filter (so that the sun is not overexposed)?
Best regards,
Constantin
Antwort von r.p.television:
Aperture manual fix, fix manual ISO, shutter speed to Auto. So I've not made up the best experience. Times I go out of a DSLR. With normal camcorders, it is similar.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
Thank you. Yes, DSLR - Use the Nikon D80 / D90 for those shots.
I enabled the long exposure to the auto modes.
Do you think that the exposure time exceeds 5 seconds shot at the night's images - of downtown Frankfurt on 300mm telephoto with top, light approximately 1:3.5? (If that is happy in the interval and photographed synonymous do not want to change the interval!)
If necessary, I'll have to just increase the interval to 7 seconds ...
The night will of course look even as night and did not "appear as bright as day"! Will the camera in auto mode so do?
Would losing because of the multitude of images and because of the computational power of postpro pleased to RAW (which I'm sure still is not!) - The exposure should vote so ...
Get the Try it out, soabld one s.Himmel again see the sun and just do not know.
Many greetings!
Antwort von Debonnaire:
You can leave NOTHING to Auto, or may be the result of frame to frame flicker and blink! This happens not only with your ambitious approach from the full day in the full night in one go, this even happens in dailies such as pure as the light of frequent changes of clouds, etc..
If you start with full tag and where the images are properly exposed, then the recordings during the dawn will tend to be too dark, until the lights of the city again provide the necessary brightness. That you are synonymous in professional time lapse recordings of sunsets so.
For the recordings during the day, I would note s.The upside potential exposure limit (histogram!) Stop, so that then arise as far as possible in the twilight pure nor good shots. The easy-to-bright images can then be easily darken in the postpro.
What will help is to make the pictures in RAW, so that you develop the photos in sections with the same correction factor can ". For the RAW format offers the larger reserves than if you had included only in JPG format.
In the finished composite film in the NLE you can then re-attempt to install a certain balance, so that the end result is ultimately less harmonic and hence it is well exposed.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Blackeagle123
http://forum.slashcam.de/viewtopic.php?p=408763 # 408,763
Watch in HD then the video has no artifacts
This was of me with / made in TV mode - ie set shutter and aperture is given of the action.
Timer set to 15sec or less 4 images per minute
JPEG images, Resolution2816x1880, project set to 1440x1080 25fps, display each image to 5 frames
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
This was of me with / in TV mode made that it is exactly what I am surprised, because actually the picture here but would just jerk and flicker, as in auto mode, or not?
Then I would still only consider if I - if PART AUTOMATIC - Aperture and Shutter let fix, I think so synonymous that it is better to have Aperture automatically to regulate. I think that long term exposure will not actually be needed, the light should be enough!
What do you think? I will adjust the camera, but as times and make several test runs have, right before the shot.
Best regards,
Constantin
Antwort von r.p.television:
So for me with my 5dmk2 was s.besten with automatic shutter, because the cracks of automatic Aperture jerky clearly visible because synonymous larger than the small jumps of the exposure time.
Across fixed, therefore common synonymous shutter may be beautiful and good order of Flimmerei, but if you want to come of a sunny day in the night is indeed the blue hour later on the video already night.
Check out the movie times in to vimeo.com Sky of Philip Bloom. He makes it just like me. The images flicker is minimal. This he describes in his blog.
For me the way, the picture flickers synonymous with completely bugs fixed when I setup a dawn movies. On what is that I could not figure out synonymous. You may vary the sky during the twilight of its brightness (I have that) only at dusk. Invisible to the eye but visible to lapse.
Antwort von r.p.television:
Oh yes. Because of the question with the maximum shutter speed: I had a starry sky at night while filming shutter speeds of 30 seconds. If you want to have in the lapse so right night, you come around to automatic shutter speed is not so, because you first, not such a fluent transition manual hinbekommst second, Aperture 1.4 and never can replace a shutter speed of 30 seconds of efficiency.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Note shutter think I was 1 / 10 un Focus was manual.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Then I'll just try both times.
Tomorrow night I'm mal-100 images in 6 seconds interval with a fixed aperture and shutter speed automatically.
The day after tomorrow night I do the same with fixed exposure time (I think synonymous s.ca. 1 / 10 or more) and an automatic aperture.
I think both manual adjust Verusch is no bargain when it comes from day to night.
Then I only hope that the lighting conditions are similar.
Then I compare the two videos and ask myself how I will take up the lapse. I'm curious how it will look the flicker. Sign up back then!
I suspect that the auto-exposure time might yield better results.
Best regards,
Constantin
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Note - remember that if you're going to AV Aperture pretend that he might be the exposure during the night at more than 4 "(s) is then changing through the course 6Sek interval given the overlap in the risk exposure and timer release.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Thank you have, just shot entirely with open aperture of the window and there was completely dark (which Mondstand) a maximum exposure time of 5 seconds. In an emergency, I would vote for 7 seconds, but it is in downtown Frankfurt synonymous slightly brighter than here. But what is clear is the more delicate with the exposure time ...
Many greetings!
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Mom, I'll make you times 2 to 3 photos of my tower ok What a s.Start Aperture, have you got there or how light is your starj Optics?
(Pros diameter please)
And at what ISO you want to photograph?
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von r.p.television:
5 seconds is not much.
With no more than 400 ISO, Aperture 2.8, you can quickly get to over 20 seconds - in the wild with sky without a moon.
The moon will be difficult because of the much brighter than stars and are much faster moving. Flits to the case of a long interval of slapstick through the Picture. Or if a purely manual Timelapse only at night and makes the sudden rising of the moon, just a white spot and is looks stupid.
've Experimented for a week because every night. Getimelapst through the darkened bathroom and freshly polished slice of my dormer.
Was a lot of junk there. When clouds are s.Himmel too long a time interval is bad because the clouds flying too fast. Since then the ISO must be hochschrauben.
Without clouds, however, are time interval of about 20 seconds no problem.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
So now the times have made on the fly
Like me, I could not think, however, is announced 30 sec
Moon occurs today no sky overcast
Weissabgleich like I'm always left on car
TV mode, then select the Aperture Cam in the case of course, the smallest issue.
23:46 The first, the last one at 23:51
I've made on windows
Then I got pictures from RAW to JPG 800PXL scale and as one put into the project, no further processing
MfG
B. DeKid
