Frage von luggiii:
Hello everybody,
like relating to:
My equipment consists of a Panasonic SD-300, Letus mini and a Canon FD-Mount Lens with Focal and 50mm.
As far as I'm very happy with it synonymous, everything is going just fine but for some shots I need a larger area is HOT and I can with my current lens, the sharpness of about 40 to about 10 cm are indeed sharp, but the sharp part has not enough to play with the sharpness of explaining hmm hard what I mean ^ ^ so the sharp area as is my settings to 50 - 55 cm or in 6 - 7 meters and I had the focus area like greater, eg 50 - 80 cm or 6 to 9 meters. important to me but at the distances p.5 meters.
Does anybody advice?
I need just one Weitwinkelopjektiv with Focal 24mm?
And does anybody know what area I can provide so sharp?
Greetings
Lukas
Antwort von srone:
lol,
:-)
This adapter was designed to minimize depth of field to have.
However, the thought with which to get is not bad for a little more wide angle, but you could synonymous abbblenden your objective, that is, instead of 1.8 blende blende zb 4.0, which you however many times s.light need. but if that still does not enough, it helps to remove the adapter of the camera.
lg
SRone
Antwort von pilskopf:
Adapter, simply remove and then perhaps in certain scenes in the postproduction the small insert desired blur.
Antwort von Piers:
Hehehehe, that is about so I've never heard of this problem.
Perhaps you've already noticed the closer you are s.einem object and each wide-angle you get, the greater will be the hot area. Maybe this helps even synonymous, with the adapter to the desired area to receive larger depth of field.
Nevertheless, a little "lol" s.dieser place ;-)
Antwort von Axel:
At a KB-Camera would be a wide angle, with, say, to have Aperture 5.6 to 8, or use smaller, more or less (by the can appoint whoever it wants, great hyperfocal distance range) a fixed-focus as with the Panasonic without adapter. With Aperture 2.8 to 4 with the adapter on the one hand you have a lot of light loss, the other is a very annoying fact is noticeable: the field is spherically curved edge (the center is sharp, the pages are slightly blurred and conversely). As charming vignette of the effect is too weak. With an adapter should be used Anglenur Wide long shot for, but for various reasons it has not quite advantages over such a simple Raynox wide-angle ancillary
without adapter. Once you have a foreground image that is to be as sharp as the background, and there has pilskopf right, the adapter off.
Antwort von luggiii:
At a KB-Camera would be a wide angle, with, say, to have Aperture 5.6 to 8, or use smaller, more or less (by the can appoint whoever it wants, great hyperfocal distance range) a fixed-focus as with the Panasonic without adapter. With Aperture 2.8 to 4 with the adapter on the one hand you have a lot of light loss, the other is a very annoying fact is noticeable: the field is spherically curved edge (the center is sharp, the pages are slightly blurred and conversely). As charming vignette of the effect is too weak. With an adapter should be used Anglenur Wide long shot for, but for various reasons it has not quite advantages over such a simple Raynox wide-angle ancillary without adapter. Once you have a foreground image that is to be as sharp as the background, and there has pilskopf right, the adapter off. cool thanks alex, finally someone who knows answer!
the explanation to my problem:
when the object moves unfocused it is too heavy for me to keep the focus on one or synonymous dollyfahrt, so my question to the sharpness.
Perhaps you've got another tip for me.
as is done for the kinofilm?
has so much skill that he fokuspuller to get the series with followfokus? ^ ^
would have been really harsh.
Well even evening yet
Antwort von Axel:
Perhaps you've got another tip for me.
as is done for the kinofilm?
has so much skill that he fokuspuller to get the series with followfokus? ^ ^ If you are interested in the topic, there is a three-part "Tut":
