Frage von Steelfox:
Schön it such a competent forum, where you truly synonymous times gets tips.
A brief summary of the situation:
We have recently filmed a commercial and usverschiedene events, edit the whole thing and sell the finished DVDs s.interessierte customers.
We always speak in advance with the respective organizers and the participating artists (if they are available).
Also in advance, we offer the organizers and artists, whose home page on the guy and on our website with mention.
All gave their consent for more production and their subsequent sale.
When my questions are specifically about a historic festival, with medieval performances in our neighborhood.
The first topic GEMA can be ignored, since any music has been removed and the background music through original compositions has been replaced.
Question 1) Is it very wrong when I use the artists on a DVD offering, where they told me only postage and material costs about 3 ¬ to pay? (this is not in the preliminary discussions have been agreed.)
Question 2) At the same time I offered an excerpt from the DVD - on the artist - to make available, so this section of the artists on its homepage or somewhere else public. EDITED this excerpt, I would however want to pay. Then he cut with his doing what he wants.
One of the artists told me now that this is not right. All recordings of the artist are his alone and I could not in this bill.
Have I not because the U-law worked on my shots?
He had his approval before to be filmed.
Nice if you give me a quick tip you could give, as I am in this specific case, behave.
Thanks in advance.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Gude
Do you have the consent in writing?
Because otherwise you can tell as much.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von KSProduction:
Schön it such a competent forum, where you truly synonymous times gets tips.
A brief summary of the situation:
We have recently filmed a commercial and usverschiedene events, edit the whole thing and sell the finished DVDs s.interessierte customers.
We always speak in advance with the respective organizers and the participating artists (if they are available).
Also in advance, we offer the organizers and artists, whose home page on the guy and on our website with mention.
All gave their consent for more production and their subsequent sale.
When my questions are specifically about a historic festival, with medieval performances in our neighborhood.
The first topic GEMA can be ignored, since any music has been removed and the background music through original compositions has been replaced.
Question 1) Is it very wrong when I use the artists on a DVD offering, where they told me only postage and material costs about 3 ¬ to pay? (this is not in the preliminary discussions have been agreed.)
Question 2) At the same time I offered an excerpt from the DVD - on the artist - to make available, so this section of the artists on its homepage or somewhere else public. EDITED this excerpt, I would however want to pay. Then he cut with his doing what he wants.
One of the artists told me now that this is not right. All recordings of the artist are his alone and I could not in this bill.
Have I not because the U-law worked on my shots?
He had his approval before to be filmed.
Nice if you give me a quick tip you could give, as I am in this specific case, behave.
Thanks in advance. zuerstmal I find that an artist should be happy that there are people which enabled recording of their performance in a position to film. synonymous, I think that it is advisable if you are writing has to be allowed to film the event. the right, taking the free pass or a fortiori to take money you have not already. one has the approval, the Royalty program to film then you can with reasonable safety to take money. It is customary for a service to get money. summer if no agreement has been made can the material on request of the artist so again destroyed. For example, if the artist with the subsequently agreed price is not satisfied with the record or in general.
Antwort von Meggs:
Synonymous, I think, is crucial in how well your presentation is provable, and whether you have a written contract with the artist did or not.
Do you have no written contract, and you can place the establishment of an oral contract does not prove the artist so you can even post prohibit the DVD's to sell.
Hast thou a contract in which the artist allowed the marketing of flat-rate, and profit-sharing or similar to refrain, then you may place the DVD synonymous sell s.wen you want. So synonymous s.den artist himself he must not take it. You can of course, the artist generally synonymous an excerpt for his home page to offer money. He must not synonymous, though he does not want. To issue an excerpt without pay, he can not force yourself synonymous, if not agreed. Personally, I would, however, hold fair for him to cut it where he is, as he is on the DVD, without further preparation for his home page to make available. With mutual link, then what has any of them.
Antwort von Steelfox:
Hi,
and ever thanks for the nice notes.
Unfortunately, we have in this case the appointment is not in writing.
Of course, we do the writing, at least most. Therefore we design each event advance to write a well-coordinated with all the stuff that is important, ie sales, etc. Gemarechte
For this event we had in the run-up to little time. A day earlier, we personally asked the organizers if we can film.
Only s.Tag of the event, however, we have decided that we then recorded the event.
The respective artists, we can only ask suburb. As a cameraman it has been, I still have a witness (because even oral negotiated their validity.)
It's just one snippet from the program of the artists to see what was also previously denied.
As already said, we have the thing with the website offered, since the access to our (my) Page but is slightly higher than that of the artists together. And with the note in the credits, we see this as free advertising for them.
The possibility of a part of another, so they themselves can make advertising,
so far as all felt very welcome, and were synonymous willing to pay for it.
The rights of all artists are in no way restricted or even suppressed been.
On the contrary, if it is accurate, we do not "free" advertising for them?
Tja. Up to here, but there are synonymous described as the alternative to the coin ...
(some so-called artists are very unique ...)
Have many thanks for any hints.
