Frage von jimbob75:
Dear Slashcam community. I would like a snowboard vacation video shoot. I have for me this year, a Sanyo Xacti HD1010 purchased. Unfortunately, the minimal focal of 50mm for some snowboarding host certainly too high.
My question, which converted the focal small format suitable for s.besten action scenes?
Sanyo offers a wide-angle adapter with a factor of 0.7, it is that enough?
What would the possible alternatives?
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Dear Slashcam community. I would like a snowboard vacation video shoot. I have for me this year, a Sanyo Xacti HD1010 purchased. Unfortunately, the minimal focal of 50mm for some snowboarding host certainly too high.
My question, which converted the focal small format suitable for s.besten action scenes?
Sanyo offers a wide-angle adapter with a factor of 0.7, it is that enough?
What would the possible alternatives? The WW more geil. 10mm WW make her a lot, 16mm Fish well, otherwise halt.
MB
Antwort von B.DeKid:
8 -10 mm So this is probably the FishEye and so 16 - 24mm a WW
Use areas in WW for FollowShoots (ie, driving alongside s.der pipe and above)
FishEye - most reported s.den edges - you will then s.Rail Slides smaller ramps and On.
0.7 is sufficient for standard stuff.
.................
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von jimbob75:
but 0.7 for 50mm is 35mm which is just away of 16-24mm
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
8 -10 mm So this is probably the FishEye and so 16 - 24mm a WW Nonsense. A fisheye is characterized by its focal, but by its distinctive edge curvature. An uncorrected Wide Angleist always a fisheye, and although s.etwa 18mm down, because only in this focal this curvature arises. Similarly, there is wide Anglebis focal 9,8 mm, but in contrast to the Fish distinguished by the fact that all straight lines remain straight synonymous.
A WW-intent is always scrap, because it bends straight lines easily, and that always looks cheap, not "fish" is not meat, and also cost of light.
MB
Antwort von joey23:
Hehe, this will create a cheap porn-look beautiful;)
Antwort von Christian Schmitt:
A WW-intent is always scrap, because it bends straight lines easily, and that always looks cheap, not "fish" is not meat, and also cost of light.
MB Then you probably do not look often skate or snowboard videos, where distorted and / or vignettierte settings genreprägend were and are.
When daylight is a trim loss may well also manageable.
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Then you probably do not look often skate or snowboard videos, where distorted and / or vignettierte settings genreprägend were and are.
When daylight is a trim loss may well also manageable. And that is exactly what makes a Fisher with with, my dear Mr. Smith, and not with an intent popel, because it looks like wanted and not have. But can not everyone synonymous;)
MB
Antwort von jimbob75:
grundsätzich I'm more of a friend of the wide normal (non-fisheye), therefore, the original 0.4 he Fisheyeadapter less in question.
That means it runs on a third-party adapter with ring out. Is there anything in the regions 0.3-0.4 factor?
Light should be in good weather on the mountain no problem.
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
grundsätzich I'm more of a friend of the wide normal (non-fisheye), therefore, the original 0.4 he Fisheyeadapter less in question.
That means it runs on a third-party adapter with ring out. Is there anything in the regions 0.3-0.4 factor?
Light should be in good weather on the mountain no problem. An intent with 1 lens element is always a fish!
Get you a halbkonvexe Lens in physics teaching equipment dealer or build a telescope apart;) Now, only if your Cam as a minimum 50mm equivalent offers, the normal focal length, before you can screw everything where you can order it durchgucken NEN Fish to make synonymous if the thread does not really fit.
MB
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Similarly, there is wide Anglebis focal 9,8 mm, but in contrast to the Fish distinguished by the fact that all straight lines remain straight synonymous. There are synonymous
8mm-WW, die nicht verzerren. Wär bei Snowboardvideos mal was neues, mal NICHT extra krumme Linien bei WW-Aufnahmen zu haben. Aber für ein Urlaubsvideo kann man sich ruhig eine extreme Zerr-Scherbe besorgen. Es geht ja um dynamische Bilder für die eigene Belustigung. Dann machts synonymous eher weniger, wenn es mehr Weichzeichner, als Wide Angleist. Z.B.
sowas
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Marc - did not mean it.
I realize that it is in WW 8mm not reported and it is synonymous with WW 16mm already reported.
Only in most cases it is assumed that the 8mm fisheye is / is only 16 mm and WW.
Also I would like to note may be that 95% of the action sports shots with lens to be rotated, the guys simply lack the money to with what I do and the XL1S associated WW Lens to rotate. Which in 90% of all recordings is more than adequate at about 24mm which makes it depicts.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von jimbob75:
what do you think the combination of the Stepdown (40.5 mm -> 37mm) with Raynox 5050HD? So I come at 25mm focal.
If you see a black rim with Stepdown adapters?
Antwort von deti:
Have the Raynox 5050HD with the Canon HF-100 tested and because it has not only vignettiert but synonymous in the right picture shows a clear edge when you test as a 37mm/37mm has inserted.
Deti
Antwort von jimbob75:
I have here are two interesting discussions found:
http://canon-hf100.blogspot.com/2008/05/hf100-wide-angle-converter.htmlhttp://www.dvinfo.net//conf/showthread.php?t=94258 I think the Raynox offers a good compromise between price and performance. A sharp Picture ratten in all corners, I expect not. That looks good enough.
Permanently Manufacturer should just watch more WW in the cameras installed. A small focal can but probably not as well marketed as 100X Zoom!
Thank you so far
