Frage von Ronsker:
After I first have an HDD camcorder have wanted, I was here by the (informed) opinions to purchase a MiniDV camcorder restores leave. Now I have him slowly but synonymous order, because the holiday is just around the corner.
According to my research will probably only be here for the two Choice:
- Panasonic NV-GS approx 440 ¬
- SonyDCR HC-47 about 330 ¬
I have read everywhere that the cameras take very little. The aim s.Tage Panasonic 3CCD with his slightly ahead lie. But filming the Sony better in low light conditions.
It is important for me (of course) a good image quality. The objective is, however, the recordings s.Ende then as a DVD for archiving or on my plasma (42'') should be. Also in the MPEG2 format of the DVD.
Now the question: Is it worth the 110 ¬ more for the Panasonic issue? If the picture on the DVD actually felt better to be clear, I suppose the Panasonic. Should it make no difference, it would probably Sonyaufgrund the price ers choice ...
Please help me, time is running ...
If someone other ne Camera recommend I look at the likes.
Antwort von Jan:
The GS 230 can be more with the HC 47 compare the GS 320 is better for me (Stable Sator, Lowlight, sharper picture with higher optical zoom, better 16 / 9 mode (with stabilizer) for the GS 230, etc. Of course, the GS 230 höherklassigen the GS 320 to the headphone output and microphone input provided.
A test of the cameras and the associated test, you will find pictures of
Video Aktiv Digital The scoring was already says everything. I count now but not again all Pana & SonyVor and disadvantages, which are often dropped.
I must still look at the plasma (or General HDTV) history. Schaut euch mal ein truly Television Picture s.euerm to. I did last week ca 6 times 720x576 PAL cameras (Pana 1 CCD & 3 CCD, Models and SonyHC a JVC) s.einen Full HD Philips drangehängt, preferably with S-video (if the camera allowed - like the GS 230 & 320).
The Philips has the 414,720 pixels Picture (GS 230, 320 & HC 47) to inflate 2 million, which is almost every model grotte ausssah bad, the TV is still known it quite well in the field. Each customer who saw the images then either cooling, or asked for an HDV & AVCHD model decided. I have Full HD JVC HD 7 s.TV, apart from the mixed stability (stability during tripod use necessarily), is a magnificent picture.
This is not intended to be hounding PAL 576i, s.einen herkömlichen tube TV, the picture of a GS 230, 320 or HC 47 good.
But those who have HD in the home accessories are available, you should think twice about whether he 576 PAL technology for much more money to buy the cameras, as is particularly the GS 500, for a small price you will get an HDV Canon HV 20th
Tests in any case such as your HD TV with the 576i PAL Camera zurrecht and if you come with the veil & pixels're happy.
VG
Jan
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
After I first have an HDD camcorder have wanted, I was here by the (informed) opinions on buying a MiniDV camcorder restores leave. Now I have him slowly but synonymous order, because the holiday is just around the corner.
According to my research will probably only be here for the two Choice:
- Panasonic NV-GS approx 440 ¬
- SonyDCR HC-47 about 330 ¬
I have read everywhere that the cameras take very little. The aim s.Tage Panasonic 3CCD with his slightly ahead lie. But filming the Sony better in low light conditions.
It is important for me (of course) a good image quality. The objective is, however, the recordings s.Ende then as a DVD for archiving or on my plasma (42'') should be. Also in the MPEG2 format of the DVD.
Now the question: Is it worth the 110 ¬ more for the Panasonic issue? If the picture on the DVD actually felt better to be clear, I suppose the Panasonic. Should it make no difference, it would probably Sonyaufgrund the price ers choice ...
Please help me, time is running ...
If someone other ne Camera recommend I look at the likes. Kannst ja mal synonymous read test reports.
And I think you want the NV-GS 320 in the Internet or buy?
Because it is so cheap in the store does not make it work.
