Frage von *BcK*:
Hello,
I have a SonyDCR Cam-PC350E with an Advanced HAD !" CCD chip recording 3.3 million pixels.
I'm with the recording quality very happy, but first wanted to ask if someone could explain to me whether a man with 3CCD cam (with 3x 800.000Pixeln) gets a better quality?
After my account is less than 3x 800.000Pixel my cam with 1x 3.3 million pixels.
Where is the difference between a chip with 3.3 million pixels and the 3CCD chip?
I look forward to your reply
*** Cheers ***
Antwort von Peter06:
Your Sonyhat GROSS 3.3 million pixels, for video capture, but only 2,048,000 pixels are used.
A 3CCD cam like the Panasonic GS320 uses 3x800.000 not synonymous but 3 x 540,000 pixels. Overall, it therefore uses 1,620,000 pixels.
For 3CCD cameras, light sensors to 3 split - one for red, one blue and one for green.
The inside looks like this:
zum Bild zum Bild For these 3 together will be a Picture calculated.
1CCD cameras have a chip. To respond to the same performance as 3CCDs to come, the chip must be larger.
Prior to each pixel of this chip is now a color either green, red or blue pass. As in the grid below you can see, there are 2x as many green as red or blue pixel (what is with the human eye to be done). From 4 adjacent pixels is now a color is calculated.
zum Bild On this figure are total of 64 pixels - 32 for green, 16 to 16 for red and blue.
49 color to be calculated, which is a factor of less 1.306122448979591836734693877551. (or (x-1) x (y-1)).
More is explained here: http://www.ccd-sensor.de/html/1_-_chip_ccd.html
I hope habs explained.
So my tips:
s.nicht of the pixel number of camera manufacturers be confused, always according to the effective pixels and not looking after the total number
b) the size (in inches) of the sensor is observed - the bigger the fraction (1 / 3 ", 2 / 3", etc.) the bigger the sensor. Bigger sensors take at gleihcer number of pixels more light on. The individual pixels are larger.
c) finished videos to compare, not on technical details left! I know your 350er. The small 3Chipper of Panasonic are not much better.
Antwort von BcK:
Hi ...
thanks for the reply, was very informative (sorry, could not write sooner, my internet has strikes) ...
Can we say the SonyDCR-PC350E makes good recordings?
I am in search of a 2nd videocam.
Do not super professional, but should already be a good mediocrity (in German: semi;)
I have now been informed several manufacturers, but I am from a large offer totally overwhelmed ...
Can someone give me tips to what to watch ... I need the videocam footage mainly for sport (ie a lot of movement) and for live concerts, etc.
Edit: Here are a couple of times Cam models are of interest to me would be:
SonyDCR-HC1000E
SonyDCR-TRV950E
SonyDCR-VX2000E
Canon XL1
I look forward to your reply
*** Cheers ***
Antwort von Peter06:
Is everything good old cams. New little more to get.
Before long, I took this list of good old cameras together, perhaps it may be needed:
[code: 1:2 f03697f26] DCR-PC120e (1 / 4 | 970)
DCR-PC330e (1 / 3 | 2048)
DCR-PC350e (1 / 3 | 2048)
DCR-TRV60e (1 / 3, 6 | 1080)
DCR-TRV80e (1 / 3, 6 | 1080)
3 Chipper:
DCR-HC1000e (3 × 1 / 4, 7 | 690 x 3 |)
DCR-PC1000e (3 x 1 / 6, 0 | 672 x 3 |)
DCR-TRV950e (3 x 1 / 4, 7 | 690 x 3 |)
- DCR-TRV900
DCR-VX1000e (3 x 1 / 3, 0 | 400 x 3 |)?
DCR-VX2000e (3 x 1 / 3, 0 | 400 x 3 |)
DCR-VX2100e (3 x 1 / 3, 0 | 400 x 3 |)
CANON: (gross?)
MVX45i (1 / 3, 4 | 2230)
MVX4i (1 / 2, 8 | 4300)
XM2 (3 x 1 / 4 | 470 x 3)
XL2 (2 x 1 / 3 | 800 x 3) [/ code: 1:2 f03697f26]
I would point s.deiner All times HDV.
