Frage von jazzfan:
the full-hd camera sony HC5 is synonymous in the 1080i format, 140x1080 pixels on mini dv to. This is neither ready nor hd hd is full, which delivers better TV picture? Full HD or HD Ready ranges. Somehow, the recording format, so none of the two. Maybe yes, therefore no preference? must be converted one way or the other?
Will I soon FS buy a hurry and need help.
Thank you very much.
jazzfan
Antwort von WoWu:
Also not all the "FullHD" Resolution1920x1080 have the TV set.
Full HD is just an advertising slogan, which states that such a signal s.Input (output) can be processed. Prior to that, or it can be interpolated frisky ... So beware and eyes on the sticker "FullHD" is not worth adhesive film on which it is printed.
Antwort von wolfgang:
So when you're in the data sheets as a 1920x1080 native Resolutionfindet, it pays to be from this quality. I'm around with the hard Sony40W2000 satisfied (synonymous when 24p can not yet). Between my older HD-ready and the real full-HD is already a significant difference.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Full HD is just an advertising slogan, which states that such a signal s.Input (output) can be processed. Mr. Wunderlich! This confuses you with HDready - stating only that the Glotze the signal via HDMI to receive and (with a minimum of 720 lines vertical resolution) can display. FullHD says (as the name suggests) the full HDTV resolution, ie 1920 times 1080 pixels.
And to the original question: To view a camcorder recording of 1440 times 1080 in the best possible sharpness to see, you need FullHD, ie: 1920 times 1080 pixels. As with all TV sets but always synonymous: Resolutionist important, but not everything. One should have the crate in the shop and just look at a few test reports study. Blurred movement or see modest contrast synonymous in FullHD not nice.
Antwort von Helene:
Quite good, 1080p24-enabled devices in about 40-42 times Inch listed below:
http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a243126.html
http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a275598.html
http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a279126.html
http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a303309.html
with the Phillips conjures the best Palbild Toshiba and Samsung, as well as an incredible contrast (for LCD ratios) and the best black value. The Sharp is very solid for the price;)
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von rosenbaum:
Hi,
I have the Samsung and a SonyHC 7, the picture is absolute class,
I would not previously believed possible gehalten.Auch the Pal-Picture can I find in order, however, are a good investment and satellite receiver vorrauszusetzen.
Gruss Jürgen
Antwort von Chrissigorn:
The HC7 is not bad. Have I considered synonymous, to retrieve.
How is this picture in low light?
@ Guest. 15.000:1 contrast, sounds good, but only dynamically. If the cart is not a plasma screen is hidden, the real contrast is about 2000:1
Antwort von DeeZiD:
@ Chrissigorn:
I was:)
The tests in the high contrast range measured in the aforementioned Toshiba or Samsung models, based essentially only on the excellent black levels.
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Chrissigorn
@ Dennis
The man is only ever in a position of contrast 10.000:1 dissolve. And in complete darkness.
Even at 0.5% (!!!) scattering reduces the resolution of the people at 200:1 (!!!!)
Your purchases and pays things that the human eye no longer can see ... and the only purpose of advertising .. not to fall into it.
