Frage von Hoeni:
Hello,
someone has experience with the SonyHC35. It should be seniors, so its easy to use and serve as a replacement for a VHS-C. The latter had the advantage so that we could work with cassette adapter, which it indeed does not exist for miniDV. Thus, the cam directly s.den Television, because a PC is not available in the budget. However, the HC35 has a docking station and a remote control, which can anticipate a comfortable handling.
Can anyone tell something about the image quality and ease of use of the HC35. The cam will in fact be a birthday gift and the donee to make as much fun as the old one.
Many thanks for the help!
Antwort von Acer:
Hello Hoeni,
I do not know if the touch screen of the HC35 is a "user-friendly can be recognized," halt subjective;.)
The docking station has all the connections that you need to connect s.den TV.
The image quality of the HC35 is mediocre, okay for home use but quite. Provides a better picture quality especially in the interior a Canon MVX450 or a Panasonic NV-GS27. Both are operated via a joystick, which is for most of the forum more convenient and user-friendly variant of the Touch Screen.
As a birthday gift one webcam is always a nice thing, but it depends on what the recipient wants to film mostly and where / under what waitresses.
As it should be senior citizen, I'd shoot to grandchildren, family, celebrations, etc. type.
If there is still a Sonysein, there was still slightly more expensive (in Comparison to the HC35) HC39, with better picture quality than the HC35.
Search times in a search under "MVX450/460", "SonyHC39" or "Panasonic NV-GS27.
It was written a review of a Panasonic NV-GS37 (NV-GS27 as equivalent).
After I read through my text again, I will tell you that I would not dissuade you of the SonyDCR-HC35, because the picture quality in daylight from these three models will not take much.
Well, I hope I could help you;.)
Ciao and nice lunch yet,
Philip
Antwort von Hoeni:
Hello Philip,
Thanks for the reply. It's just going to the best possible compromise. The HC39 exceed the budget of the giver. In any case, it should even be just the original HC23. Because of the remote control I then ended up with the HC24 and then just did not add the docking station and so we were now actually take the HC35. The offer Panasonic and Canon, I do not think. And the GS27 does not have a viewfinder. From the technical details differ, the three Sony's unlikely, but more of the equipment. Why is the Picture "not great" and more in the HC39? If only the difference in the Resolutionist, but then you see that on a normal TV set anyway blunt, right? And better than the VHS-C will be surely synonymous, the HC35? Mainly to be the way out the films will be filmed and then archived as they come out of the camera. Since nothing more is done with, except that they be put in the closet: o) In terms of ease of use do you have right of course. Personally, I would get along with all systems, but to me it's not so.
Incidentally, the "advisers recommend" consistently Sonyand Panasonic and the MM in this price range rather Sonywegen the Zeiss lens. In the upmarket Panasonic probably used Leica Lenses and which are then better again. Only when the budget is not just enough.
As initially stated, it is the best compromise between image quality, handling, features and price, with me is s.Herzen primarily of course the image quality. Is the HC35 really so bad?
Many greetings and a beautiful Sunday.
Hoeni
Antwort von Acer:
The image quality of SonyHC23/24/35 was seen in many tests (and experience) behind the Canon MV900.
Sonyverwendet Carl Zeiss - a very good brand, well - but behind the so-called tests were relatively well before Sony Canon (: SonyDCR-HC35 and Canon MV960). The Canon-Lenses are synonymous brand quality (Canon has since more than 60 years, this sector).
The image quality in both 4:3 and 16:9 mode, the Canon MV9xx series was more than the SonyDCR-HC35. You have in 16:9 in the CanonMV9xx much more info on the Sony asl.
In addition, the Canon has a joystick synonymous, and a 16:9 screen, which many much.
Insegsamt is clearly Sonyaber with the DCR-HC17 better than with the HC35. The new series (HC23, 24, 35) has become in my opinion a step backwards. Also in Comparison to Canon, is the HC17 over all evaluation criteria, and is everywhere with well-rated very good.
Also the price has fallen over time, and as far as I know is located at about 300 ¬.
Okay ,;.), I think the gift is yours with the SonyDCR-HC17 very well served, then a Canon MV900 with Panasonic NV-GS27 and would then SonyDCR-HC35. But if you have the possibility of the HC17 is warranted, I would hesitate net.
Ciao,
Philip
Antwort von Jan:
Incidentally, the "advisers recommend" consistently Sonyand Panasonic and the MM in this price range rather Sonywegen the Zeiss lens. In the upmarket Panasonic probably used Leica Lenses and which are then better again. Only when the budget is not just enough.
Not me!, Well, the HC has 35 fast AF and probably the most useful night program, at 30 lux, the picture looks the HC 23 / 35 are very similar with the GS 27th
It has to do the soecified Carl Zeiss optics is not so much with Zeiss to recognize one s.price, eg Zeiss optics with a German Edelfirma Contax cost tens of times more than the ¬ 300-400 of the Sony camera, also we had our last conversation.
In the VAD image test of the "acclaimed" Zeiss HC was 23 almost identical with the Panasonic GS 27 - I believe in "Focus" was even Pana front - perhaps can hardly be a genuine Zeiss so.
Many sellers give the Zeiss / Leica Lens halt as the main reason to buy.
The HC 39 has more mans (Micro), recording a larger sensor, more resolution, real 16 / 9, Battery FP 50 (about 2 h instead of FP 30 is s.Bord lapse at HC 23 / 35), time, recordings, etc.
The HC 23/35 times precisely to create an average Picture Pal, both have net 400,000 pixels - less than the 414,720 admitted - and that without 3 CCD. Pal from a very good picture, you can not speak for the novice, especially in less light, they weaken a bit. Canon MV 900 will be better, but it has other weaknesses, such as bad MF and the repeatedly stated drive noise.
Some good old Hi8 camcorders with optical stabilization suggests the cheapest MiniDV beginners
in terms of low light - the less noisy picture is quite possible.
The docking station would serve me as important, are s.der Cam HC 35 is only AV output - the rest is s.der Statio -. which are then dragged always have.
The supplied charger s.jeder Panasonic Mini DV Consumer estimate is much higher.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Hoeni:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the answer. It is certainly not so simple. Question 5 people and you have at least 10 recommendations. With digital cameras I have had the experience that only a "self-experiment may help" and then when one is satisfied, then it already fits. Since I am currently between the HC35 and the GS37 out and her pendulum, I'll get me perhaps both once for testing. Is it the way that Sonykein Charger mitliefert and recharge the battery in one of the action has? Is there a charger as accessories?
Greeting
Hoeni
Antwort von Acer:
If you receive the Cams time to test, let out under any circumstances, the DCR-HC17. If indeed one to two more years earlier had been produced, but has convinced but more testing magazines.
Ciao,
Philip
Antwort von Jan:
Well, I think the GS 37 is too expensive, the video brings light, in principle, nothing that most needs the USB high-speed interface is not anyway - better the movie will be transferred via firewire, the software is well, Battery is synonymous CGA DU 6 - 45 min -1 h, remote control is very good ok.
Yes, the Canon 's / JVC / Sony's are factory-loaded with a camera - docking station or cord into the camera (eg. HC 17/23/35).
Charger for Sony HC 17 / 23 / 35 BC TRP would be about 65 ¬, contractor about 20-50 ¬.
Whether in the camera shop is good, everyone should decide for himself, for me, no.
For me, the HC 35 is / GS 37 is no great leap of HC 17 / 23 for HC 35 - GS 27 / 37 - the next HC 39 / HC 44 or GS 75 / 180 already - although the remote control, especially in Sonywegen the Touch Screen 's should not be underestimated.
LG
Jan
