Frage von DarkWolve:
Hi,
test reports after long wrangling and forth, and test videos and and properties ... etc. etc. ..
I still can not decide ...
I have a SonyDSC-R1 with 2 FP50 Batteries
the same the synonymous use of the HC96,
however, attach much importance to image quality, optics and lowlight starch
The only question now is whether I nen standart (HC96), one (in the consumer sector) good camcorder (GS500), or at least the next generation will take the HD (HC3) ...
HC3 when I find the slow motion effect very great (200 images in 3 seconds)
Besides, I'd rather buy a Sony camcorder, because Sonyder Manufacturer of CCD and CMOS chips is, and indeed still Sonykauft Panasonic's camcorder in the manufacture of the chips.
I'm over all the camcorder before and cons in the clear ... what my decision is, however, still influenced the decision to MiniDV or HDV.
Sonyist lowlight very strong, Panasonic 3CCD and OIS, although the SteadyShot of Sonynicht is worse than the OIS of Panasonic.
The GS500 has Procinemamodus nen.
The HC96 has nothing comparable, the HC3 takes progressive.
the Money plays a role, of course, synonymous
But price-performance verhätnis plays the major
one of the three, it should be
while the HC96 will only be a transitional model to bridge the time to get out to other models
mfg
Wolve
Antwort von DarkWolve:
Advanced HAD technology:
HAD = Hole Accumulation Diode
Sony's semiconductor structure developed semiconductor structure in CCDs, which much reduces the dark current and make the imager more sensitive. Lens development is on the chip, ie before any pixels are small micro-lens is applied.
The HC96 has it, an enhancement of image quality in lowlight
ClearVid CMOS:
The CMOS sensor is tilted by 45 °, so instead there is just like a normal CCD or CMOS sensor is no longer 2 green blue and red for each sensor, but 6 green, blue, and each for each red sensor.
The result is a higher Resolutionauf the same area of a chip.
Sun HD videos in 1080i can be generated.
Antwort von george87:
"The HC3 Notes to progressive."
well ...
"when I find the HC3 slow motion effect very great (200 images in 3 seconds)"
prima ...
Thanks, those are very interesting information!
Antwort von ruessel:
"The HC3 Notes to progressive." Nonsense.
"when I find the HC3 slow motion effect very great (200 images in 3 seconds)" But, to use only in very poor quality, thus hardly be beaten.
See HC1 + HC3 Film examples: http://www.fxsupport.de/hc1/hc1_9.html
Antwort von Acer:
I like the NV-GS500 s.besten. These CMOS chips like I somehow do not, everything seems to be constructed and interploiert too. The HC3 is often criticized synonymous and the software and hardware you need for HDv is very expensive.
>> Also, I'd rather buy a Sony camcorder, because Sonyder Manufacturer of CCD and CMOS chips is, and Panasonic in the manufacture of his camcorder so still Sonykauft of the chips. <<
That's not a contradiction. When Panasonic Sony buys chips, the sin but equally good as the Sony chips in the Sony cameras.
Overall, I would prefer the NV-GS500. If you relieve your wallet more synonymous the NV-GS400, or a class of NV-GS500.
Cu;.)
Antwort von Jan:
The HC 3 has a progressive mode field to full screen, but the camera does not take frames on pure (An error on the homepage Sony.de) because Ruessel is right, 1080 would be nice for Some P Although it is not so.
LG
Jan
Antwort von george87:
nen that the error can make on the Page you do not know,
have expected to stop ...
If this is not the case ...
Thanks for the Page with the comparisons!
It is better to have a buy on the grounds Sonyzu because Sonydie better CCD 's first used for his own camcorder before he s.Panasonic, Canon & Co sold.
Sonyja will also synonymous with the chip sale to earn money, so the others Cams Manufacturers are generally a little more expensive than those of Sony
Antwort von Acer:
Manufacturer others generally a little more expensive than those of Sony I have exactly the opposite experience. Sonyist generally more expensive than equivalent performance models, see DCR-HC96 and Panasonic NV-GS280 or Canon MVX40 me. Or SonyDCR-HC17 and Canon MV930, etc.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Comparison of probelmatisch here - because you have a HDV camcorder with 2 DV avi compare devices. Even if the HC3 records just not progressive, but in 1080 50i, that device does offer a significantly higher Resolutionals DV-avi. This speaks, in my view, the time for massive HC3.
But I would definitely take the device in his hand - and look at me, how can you mean. Synonymous with the opportunity and test a little, whether you like lowlight behavior ranges - and compare it with the other candidates, if possible. For it is in the HC1 and HC3 seems not necessarily bad - but obviously weaker than the FX1. Only, what are you here as adequately defined it for you, only you can define.
