Frage von TiMovie:
Has anyone of you with the FX1 nem witwinkel im einsatz.
Question blurs the picture during fast movements synonymous still so strong as without Wide angle or fisheye? I have no real comparison because I used almost exclusively gfilmt with fisheye s.meiner sony vx 2000 and the picture during fast movements look good!
Skate Videos "
TiMovie
Antwort von molch:
Hi,
well, the moving object is at the same distance and zoom fisheye halt with little in the picture, then moves through a small detail during the exposure, which makes synonymous with the fx1 to
but if you with the fisheye on it so far ranzoomst that the object in the picture is the same size as normal without fisheye, then you have no differences.
in German: the same effect as synonymous with the ww you score, adding next go away ...
yes, it is always: everything that has happened during the exposure in front of the cam is in the form of motion blur on it Mitr.
Antwort von Markus:
yes, it is always: everything that has happened during the exposure in front of the cam is in the form of motion blur on it Mitr. Denounced in connection with HDV, I have already seen that (a user is precisely this blurring of the chemical film and any analog or digital video camera is also available) than HDV's weakness! Since my mouth must have been open to the floor from sheer speechless ... was probably his first video camera! ;-)
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Ok! In a fisheye that is probably because the n bit different object filmed in the center is a slower movement or long stays in the center (curved lens). must test the most simple!
thank you!
Antwort von ruessel:
What have you actually always with motion blur and HDV? For me, as everything HC1 owner completely cold coffee!
Once you buy more devices that may pose synonymous interlaced properly ......
see HDV test here:
Antwort von MiXMaster:
You were on your Page writes that the Recording with 1 / 100 is made, not with 1 / 50 sec / Picture. Then you write with a red color in the Picture "The star is shown sharp, but the rest of the image on LCD / Plasma blurred and muddy."
What you now want to say in connection with the Fischeye anyway?
Antwort von ruessel:
Where here is that with exposure times? Title was: SonyHDR FX1 with fisheye better image quali during fast movements??
Whether wide-angle, fisheye whether whether sonstwas .... HDV is not worse on movement (muddy) than other interlace images, only the current LCD + Plasma's are not able to display high-definition material was of high quality fast /.
With a fish-eye lens, only the interlace "problem" for a bad screen is adjusted .... is just as if I film the whole time turned upside down so that the LCD screen mounted in the living room, the video displays properly again ...
Greeting from Ruessel
Antwort von MiXMaster:
With you is this:
"Here the reference material: HDR HC1 Film Test 13 Technical data is this: Shutter Speed 100, F4, Gain 0 db, file size 99,583 KB."
This too is nonsense, of course:
"Only the current LCD + Plasma's are not able to display high-definition material was of high quality / fast."
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin,
This too is nonsense, of course:
"Only the current LCD + Plasma's are not able to display high-definition material was of high quality / fast." That's right!!
Clip 13 is synonymous ok, the violent Querillen at 70km / h overwhelm the SteadyShot. But has nothing to do with HDV to.
Antwort von ruessel:
With you is this:
"Here the reference material: HDR HC1 Film Test 13 Technical data is this: Shutter Speed 100, F4, Gain 0 db, file size 99,583 KB."
This too is nonsense, of course:
"Only the current LCD + Plasma's are not able to display high-definition material was of high quality / fast." I think we talk / write to each other by .....
gruss vom Ruessel
