Frage von BenBomber:
Good day,
I would like to purchase two cameras for semi contributions. Here, a camera, the "Main Camera" and his second for secondary settings are used. In addition to the settings I have the HVR-A1E chosen, because I find very handy and still make acceptable pictures. The main camera I had the HVR-Z1E envisaged. Now the question arises whether the HVR-V1E CMOS because of the better small A1E fits or whether the difference to the seemingly better yes Z1E against V1E so crass as the weight falls, the Z1E the V1E in any case preferable.
About tips and suggestions I would be very grateful.
Sincerely,
Ben
Antwort von bumsbomber:
you actually need 4 xlr inputs?
other times, perhaps on the combination:
HC5 / z1 or HC5 / v1
or
h20 / s.nachdenken
which should at least 1000, - euro come cheaper.
gruß cj
Antwort von Bernd E.:
HC5 / z1 or HC5 / v1 But remember this: The HC5 not only has no XLR inputs, but there is no microphone input. Then, still prefer the HC7, because even when it's cheap rail should be.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von allgaeulady:
ups
thought of the new sony Now
the lack of HC3 no longer have.
then of course the HC7!
gruß cj
Antwort von Jan:
Hi Ben,
if it is somehow a professional should be, then please HDR FX 7 and HVR V 1 Not only because you get the same pictures, you can professionally synonymous in the exposure (to be / r, Aperture, Shutter and Gain) intervene HVR A 1 is basically a consumer camera (touch screen) with XLR and a few nice details. The housing of the FX / R / V series are synonymous another league.
You can read the two models (FX 7 + V 1) is much better to vote, if you absolutely XLR or Progressive mode, eg the need is the V 1 to the body, otherwise the 7th FX Zb both cameras 1 / 50 sec, Aperture 1.6 and 6 dB gain, which is so with the HVR A 1 not.
The FX 7 so synonymous costs about 300-500 ¬ more - which I think are well spent.
HC 5.7 Consumer boxes are simple, not comparable with a V & Z 1 I think I can judge, filmed a long time with Consumer Class Pana GS 500 & SonyHC 3, is now exclusively with FX 7 and PD 170th If any claim is there, the synonymous Camera quickly and correctly without any manual to use wild or via touch screen menu, select everything, but as with FX 7 rear professionally Gain, WAG, Shutter and the Aperture s.der Page to activate.
Combination FX 1 & Z 1 can be synonymous chart, the better Wide Angleum 5 mm, the larger sensors (1 / 3 ") and a little bit brighter picture speak for them, the FX 7 & V 1 have a few more features or more combinations of functions (Peaking and zebra at the same time, synonymous in the AF focusieren manuel etc) and the 20x zoom when shooting with common light sources: the CMOS sensor (little smear strips).
Of course would be synonymous 2 Canon XH A 1 is a good idea.
But I would not necessarily mix 2 company, later cut when the material is simply not quite fit together and you have work properly.
Even with the same firm may be visible image differences, as for me yesterday with PD 170 and FX 7 in DV mode, the PD 170 has significantly more aware of the drawing and slumber light Picture stronger, we must first adapt ....
VG
Jan
Antwort von cutterfeld:
Thank you for your answers.
After many interviews and intensive research, but now I tend to the solution of 2 x Canon XH A1.
Priced very attractively and at least one has no quality differences. Is there a possibility the two Canons to sync (maybe firewire) or does it only with the larger models? Save advancing one but so much work during cutting.
As the budget included accessories, I had to stop me ¬ 10,000 net set.
Regards,
Ben
