Frage von fezze:
Hi, anticipating the search function I've used, and thus I came to the following question.
In a previous post has a user a "SonyHi8 CCD VX1E" with a digital capture function, record direct to PC, laptop, etc, provided.
Since it is always a heavy equipment in tow, I thought I have when I look at the Cam. s.einen Mp3 player (for example, "Archos AV700 or Auvisio 3.5" HardDisk MediaBox ") connected, so to say the material is not on the Hi8 tape but save directly to disk is a good result erziehle.
The digital recorder feature, but unfortunately only in VGA resolution, so
640 * 480, is thus already reached the maximum of what I made such a COMBO rausholen could gibts or even better variants, synonymous with the video quality would be improved?
I want to stop so that the benefits of an 8mm camera with which a digital unite =)
Hope you understand what I want to ask =)
Thanks in advance.
mfg
fezze
Antwort von beiti:
I want to stop so that the benefits of an 8mm camera with which a digital unite =) And what are the advantages of video-8-Cam would it?
Antwort von Lifesat:
naja example is a three SonyVX1E Chipper with 1 / 3 CCD when I'm not mistaken, also has the Cam. Zebra function, MF and many more manual controls.
At 8mm or Hi8 tapes can be 400-line resolution Ban on MiniDV is synonymous perhaps 500 more, but then yes, I would want to avoid anyway, so everything in the end only of the lenses (interchangeable) and of the CCD depends.
Corrected me when I say what wrong =)
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Corrected me when I say what wrong =) Your approach is simply wrong. If, therefore, presumably, that to CD-and DAT-time "digital" car with best quality and lossless storage was equated. The industry has the people of course synonymous with other digital media in the belief gleassen - are DVD or digital TV (strictly speaking, even DV) best be robust, but not without loss.
So: If you are the high quality picture of your three-chip camera of a video-player pocket on VGA Resolutionherunterrechnen lets you see a better picture of nothing. If you Hi8 best Digitizer want to go just by appropriate D8 camcorder or the other,
here
Antwort von beiti:
The lines with the 400 on Hi8 was always a nice selling point ... ;)
I know the VX1 yet. That was one of the first 3-Chipper and has basically s.der moderate Hi8 Resolutiongelitten. At that time, some of them in the studio s.einen S-VHS recorder, which provided much more resolution.
The idea of recording with an external device to improve, it is obvious. Better and cheaper than with a DV recorder, however, there will not be (but is only one Y / C PAL signal when a good synonymous). If you look at what mobile DV recorder cost, is likely to change to a (possibly used) computer model, the cheaper and more practical solution.
As far as I know, was the first DV camcorder of Sony (VX1000) is still the same 3 chips like the VX1. The image quality of the VX1000 will be the maximum, which can be seen from the camera part of the VX1 rausholen can. Newer models (VX2000, VX2100) are in terms of luminous Resolutionund again a lot better.
Antwort von Lifesat:
great, I oute me here as a game ball of the general advertising industry =)
do you know how high the loss rate would be if you then Hi8 recording with A / D converter on the PC is playing and how much you can win if you like with A / D converter Captured?
Thanks for the quick help
Antwort von Quadruplex:
do you know how high the loss rate would be if you then Hi8 recording with A / D converter on the PC is playing and how much you can win if you like with A / D converter Captured? You must try. Here someone has already written that the camera head better than the drive. I found (at the time, have already tried out no more forever) Hi8 is not so bad. A practical aspect is of course that a flanged A / D converter, the camera naturally festnagelt - You have only your cable length as radius.
