Frage von the8islate:
Hi folks,
would like to skateboard-film technology in the future, but are synonymous little short projects planned.
It also wants after graduation in synonymous in the direction of media and designers in film making something.
When the first camera I have the "future issue" and a lot of good opinions on the decision SonyVX 2100. Hab nen good offer will receive for 1800 ¬. Almost as new with warranty.
Times wanted to ask whether the choice of camera for me as a Beginners now a bit too high, my yes, I would like to learn and I am so intensely. Vllt advise her to me so s.oder which suggests to me something else.
Greeting
sebastian
Antwort von opel:
phew ....
So, the cost of new at ¬ 4,000!
Ask times after, why you are so cheap can get.
You are Beginners, perhaps hidden Macken does not recognize.
Furthermore, the camera certainly the first choice when it comes to Lowlight and MiniDV, but the battery life you should not ignore.
I would just check again.
Antwort von lumpi:
tell her about the same camera? The new VX2100 will cost but "only" around 2000 EUR ... it can be very advisable, with the synonymous, I have begun!
Antwort von the8islate:
jaa it is about the vx the 2100th
they've found new for 1800.
the used with 15 month warranty but synonymous with his luggage and extra battery.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... the cost of new at ¬ 4,000 !...... That was (or is even still?) The suggested retail price, which Sonynie s.die real market has adjusted. A look at various price search shows so that a new price of 1800 Euro is now realistic.
... the battery life you should not ignore ... Since there is very little money properly functioning and very powerful battery replicas exist, would I have to, in fact, not too huge capacity of the enclosed Batteries s.Werk no big worry.
... Wanted to ask whether the times ... Camera ... is too high ... it Vllt advise me yes s.oder which suggests to me something else ... Because thou hast ambitious, exceeding the average vacation or Youtube filmmakers go, you're with the VX2100 is certainly not poorly served. I myself, for several years and am not least because of its magnificent ability Lowlight big fan of her - and yet today, I would not buy anymore. Why? On the one hand, the trend is inexorably to HD, and since it's already to consider whether there is a greater amount invested in SD. On the other hand - and if you've decided for SD - I would try to prefer a well-preserved PD170 to get. This is largely the same camera, but it offers some professional control and especially a good audio section with two XLR inputs. Its absence is the biggest shortcoming of the VX2100.
Antwort von the8islate:
thanks for the reply, but a pd cost you ¬ 3000 again.
thought the sound of the vx2100 was pretty good and you can still synonymous to an external micro-connect? what exactly is this xlr connection.
Antwort von thos-berlin:
The XLR connector is synonymous for microphones. But it is designed to work much more stable and symmetrical configuration you can connect microphones, making a very long microphone cable (virtually theater) are possible.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
pd ... a cost you ¬ 3000 again ... Used dive being repeatedly PD150/170 certainly already in the price category to a new VX2100.
... thought the sound of the vx2100 was pretty good and you can still synonymous to an external micro-connect ... In the context of systemic boundaries (as of thos-berlin described) is the sound good already, but the VX2100 has just a single connection via unbalanced microphone jack - the PDs have two separate aussteuerbare via XLR. How important to you the chance of a professional sound recording in the camera itself is, of course, only you know yourself: There are so synonymous external solutions.
Antwort von the8islate:
I'm still confused these HD and HDV - thing.
Many people tell me so with a 2100 are you doing nothing wrong, despite the age of the camera. Others prefer to say investing in HD. For HD you need it but again much synonymous or equipment? Also I heard that a lot of software still does not properly handle that can briefly AVCHD?
Then in HDV, which is HD-material based on its mini-DV is being recorded. Well in advance, for example, that in the active video guide says: "Buy-it tape Cams - as long as they do there."
Another criterion: 16:9
In times of youtube with the new 16:9, the vx2100 so what can not. Is it useful still ne SD with 4:3 to fetch?
Furthermore, I heard that HDV is not necessarily good for Fisheye-thing related to skateboarding and action-shots should be, because what is truth? Is HDV really not good for something?
Here is my criteria:
1. Henkel camera (although there are so synonymous adapter - keyword - Caddy Cam - The Scorpian)
2. I would like to skateboard things with fisheye filming but synonymous Short Film-bit moderately high spin
3. For HD, I am unsure because of the medium to post
4. With HDV I've heard bad, maybe you can find the yes again disassemble and clarified.
Hope I have not written too many salad:)
Thanks for the help.
the8islate
Antwort von Axel:
In times of youtube with the new 16:9, the vx2100 so what can not. Is it useful still ne SD with 4:3 to fetch? Somehow not. It was not true that the VX2100 has no 16:9 mode, he is content with only a quality loss. 16:9 on YouTube would be nothing earth, 720p, on the other hand can stop looking already old SD (576
i Pal of DV cameras have an effective height of 288 pixels per field / movement phase, ie just over one third, the rest is for Webfilme more or less well-interpolated).
Furthermore, I heard that HDV is not necessarily good for Fisheye-thing related to skateboarding and action-shots should be, because what is truth? Is HDV really not good for something? Where did you hear that? It is not true.
I will not burn their fingers out, give you a tip regarding HDV vs. AVCHD to give the other will do. I do not trust me, however, to HD you guessing.
How important to you XLR connections are, you decide. For skateboard recordings are not necessary. And of course drives the price high.
Antwort von weitwinkel:
Furthermore, I heard that HDV is not necessarily well .... related to skateboarding and action-shots should be, because what is truth? Is HDV really not good for something?
if it could be with a camera with cmos chip problems with the
rolling shutter type (see fosu ).... and has nothing to do with a good fisheye
adapter before an HDV cam to do ...
gruß cj
