Frage von DJ Universe:
Hello,
hab da mal NEN big problem:
I stream a NSV server currently with a webcam.
Now I have a second Cam bought a different type and would like both cams simultaneously on a stream that run.
Both are USB 2.0-cams of the Logitech and the other of Ednet.
My question is, do I need an extra program-if so which one, or can I open NSV Live Capture synonymous and need only an extended plug-in with Cap NSV Live is a plugin yes or not?
Who can help me there?
The sooner, the better.
BTW I've already seen in other radios, which the 2 cams would run, on the one hand was the moderator and can be seen on the second just someone else, but they both ran in Winamp in a complete picture if the picture still was in the Picture ? And if so, how can I achieve this?
Questions about issues, but I'm honestly synonymous in this new area, but would like it to my listeners, not deprived, with 2 Cams on stream.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Antwort von soundproducer:
Hello,
for me it is exactly the same problem. Use synonymous NSV and two webcams, but unfortunately it can not currently synonymous parallel ...
With Splitcam (www.splitcamera.com), you can at least, of a cam switch to the other (during the broadcast). You get with the program an additional webcam driver you NSVCAP with a new device can adjust ...
What we are looking for both, but Effects like "picture in picture (PIP) where in the video window or an additional small window, where you then can show Webcam 2. Or a so-called "split-screen" where you can see 1 links as moderator and facilitator in the Picture 2 on the right.
---> Maybe someone of you know whether such effects with "WEBCAM" for live capture are possible? Software? <---
Of course, some radio stations already use the above effects. Basically, this is achieved with 2 camcorders (no webcams) and a Capure card for the computer or a video mixer! I find this solution but frankly too expensive ...
Schönen Gruß!
Antwort von Flanders:
would be nice if someone here with rat and tat site could stand for, because we obviously already twosome are an AND with the same problem ......
Thank you
