Frage von deazrow:
Hello,
I have a few more photos are here, to which I no longer have a negative quality is fairly decent, in size 13x18 matte ...
first question, what is better to use the photos as "image-to-image" in the photo business to imitate or copy somewhere in a good quality scanner using collections and then the files can easily develop normally? or both could be the quality of her results in fairly close together? perhaps someone has experience with it?
Secondly, I have here is a normal scanner, hp scanjet 4400c, maximum 1200x1200dpi resolution ...
if I am one of the above can scan photos, the auto scanner is always a resolution of 150 (not 150x150), it is just only 150 there, goes up to 2400th According to the software is 150 for my photo enough. result is a bitmap that is in. jpg 50kb converted all big ...
I am on 300 or 600, I see really no difference in outcome, except the. jpg file size to 1200 are even disturbing streak in endbild drauf ...
it may be that a 13x18 photo of relatively good quality with sufficient 150dpi is scanned and / or make it meaningful it higher? but it can hardly be that if I so 50kb result. jpg would develop, it would have the same quality as, or scanned? I seem to 50kb arg little something .... would like to scan 600, which as I said optical see no difference, because it is more useful in comparison to the 150 a better quality would provide in-developed photo afterwards?
I hope I have not expressed to be incomprehensible.
Thank you
mfg
Antwort von nette9999:
I hope I have not expressed to be incomprehensible. A bit.
I dare say that the photo store next to nothing synonymous, as the picture to scan. Perhaps with a little more expertise in this area, as you apparently have ... but salted Prices required.
You forgot to set your software to describe. Perhaps you've forgotten synonymous in the user manual of this software to watch. But with almost certainly did it make you, regardless of the actually correct forum category, missed the forum. In the photo community will certainly have one or the other times this issue has been given.
Basically, it is always better for the best possible quality is always the maximum settings to choose. Later you can yes runterskalieren, which still will look better than directly in this Resolutiongescannt.
Antwort von nette9999:
you are still negative?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
you are still negative? ... have a few more photos are here, to which I no longer have a negative ... Gruß Bernd E.
